Yard Signs Solve the World's Problems

In my endless driving around Austin I frequently find myself in the swanky Hyde Park neighborhood with its tree-lined streets, gratuitous 'traffic calming devices', plentiful McMansions, and population of leftist urban yuppies. I have to admit that I used to live there, until I realized that we could sell our house for ridiculously more than we paid for it and move to a larger house in the country.

Hyde Park is a neighborhood of contradictions. It's home to one of the largest and wealthiest Baptist churches in the nation, surrounded by a neighborhood of college professors, musicians, Internet entrepreneurs, and militant humanists who oppose the Baptist social and political agenda almost as much as they oppose the church's desire to expand its real estate holdings and blight the neighborhood with new construction. The neighborhood is known for its hippie attitude, arts and crafts bungalows, and beautiful trees, yet it's packed with millionaires who are cutting down trees to expand their historic homes, while still paying lip service to the progressive ideology of their compatriots.

This is the neighborhood where people driving Priuses with an Escalade hidden in their garage either live or wish they lived. I've written before about their penchant for confusing bumper stickers, and now it seems that the same muddled mentality has spilled over into their exquisitely xeriscaped yards in the form of earnest but nonsensical yard signs.

These signs are usually provided in exchange for a donation by left-leaning activist groups who are pushing a particular local or national agenda, and find fertile ground to plant their seeds in Hyde Park. The most recent crop of signs to spring up in Hyde Park is provided by the all-outrage-all-the-time umbrella activist group Third Coast Activist. In blood red letters on a white background they declare "FOR PEACE NOW Bring the Troops Home."

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2Page 3
Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for dave-nalle

Article Author: Dave Nalle

Dave Nalle has been a magazine editor, freelance writer, capitol hill staffer, game designer and taught college history for many years. He is Chairman of the Republican Liberty Caucus, working to promote liberty in the GOP. …

Visit Dave Nalle's author pageDave Nalle's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • America Alone: The End of the World as We Know It America Alone: The End of the World as We Know It

    In this, his first major book, Mark Steyn--probably the most widely read, and wittiest, columnist in the English-speaking world--takes on the great poison of the twenty-first century: the anti-Americanism ...

Article comments

— go to most recent comments
  • 1 - Dr Dreadful

    May 19, 2007 at 1:02 pm

    I'm confused, Dave. Your blurb for this article suggests that you're going to be talking about your skepticism on the effectiveness of political yard signs.

    But really the piece is about your taking issue with one sign in particular.

  • 2 - Dr Dreadful

    May 19, 2007 at 4:22 pm

    Although had you actually written an article about yard signs I would probably have agreed with you - particularly your correlating it to things like bumper stickers and (I would add) election posters.

    Such things are pointless inasmuch as they don't advance the democratic process. They're not even effective advertising. You don't walk past a house during an election campaign, glance up at the window and say to yourself, "Ah, I was going to vote for Candidate A, but now, having seen this poster, I think I should vote for Candidate B." Similarly, it's not really feasible to get out of your car in traffic, walk to the vehicle in front of you, ask the driver to roll down the window and say, "Excuse me, but I disagree with the sentiment on your bumper sticker because..." Not unless you want to start a global road rage war, anyway.

    All such stickers and signs really are is a modern form of tribal marking - something to let everyone know which group you belong to.

  • 3 - Lumpy

    May 19, 2007 at 6:52 pm

    I haven't seen this particular sign, but in my area there are a number of equally poorly reasoned ones mostly against the war, which is kind of ironic considering how close we are to the pentagon and how many military and pentagon employees live around here. I can only assume the goal of the signs is to piss off most of their neighbors.

  • 4 - Dr Dreadful

    May 19, 2007 at 8:22 pm

    Er, Lumpy...

    (1) From your description you're in or near DC, which is the most heavily Democratic-leaning city in the nation;

    (2) Most of the signs probably belong to military and Pentagon employees.

  • 5 - Lumpy

    May 19, 2007 at 9:39 pm

    Yes, Dr., I live in northern virginia. The area where I am has a politically diverse population. It"s nothing like DC. And I do know many of my neighbors. Some work in Langley, some at the pentagon and some in DC. Trust me it's not the first two groups who have anti-war signs on their lawns. It wouldn't be prudent and from what I can tell they support the war if not necessarily being totally on board with the administration.

  • 6 - Clavos

    May 19, 2007 at 9:39 pm

    I don't know about Pentagon employees, Dr. D, but the military (at least the career soldiers, anyway) tends more to Republican than Dem.

  • 7 - Dave Nalle

    May 19, 2007 at 9:41 pm

    I'm confused, Dave. Your blurb for this article suggests that you're going to be talking about your skepticism on the effectiveness of political yard signs.

    You might want to read that blurb again. The skepticism in it is directed not at the effectiveness of yard signs as advertising, but at their effectiveness as means of expressing an intelligent opinion.

    And as far as my objection to the specific sign mentioned, it's really only an example of a genre of poorly conceived signs.

    Dave

  • 8 - RJ

    May 19, 2007 at 11:44 pm

    Yard signs are politically powerful weapons, however, in local races where name recognition is the main factor.

  • 9 - Dr Dreadful

    May 19, 2007 at 11:55 pm

    the military (at least the career soldiers, anyway) tends more to Republican than Dem.

    I wonder if it's because - until recent times, at least - it has tended to be Democratic presidents who got America into wars and Republicans who got you out of them.

    That may change...

  • 10 - RJ

    May 20, 2007 at 1:04 am

    No, it's because Republicans support killing our enemies and building up the military and increasing their pay, and Democrats loath the military and demand retreat and defeat and slash military spending to pay for socialist domestic programs.

  • 11 - Dr Dreadful

    May 20, 2007 at 1:42 am

    RJ

    When make sweeping assertion, please to back up with fact.

  • 12 - Dave Nalle

    May 20, 2007 at 3:09 am

    Dr.D, despite the gunghoness of it, RJ did stick to basic, verifiable assertions. There;s plenty to fault the GOP for, but he didn't go those directions.

    Dave

  • 13 - Dave Nalle

    May 20, 2007 at 1:55 pm

    Yard signs are politically powerful weapons, however, in local races where name recognition is the main factor.

    I noticed that in a recent local election. People seemed to actually be paying attention to the yard signs in our local mayoral election. But then when the votes were counted, the three candidates (one white, one black, one hispanic) split the votes along lines almost identical to the racial breakdown of the voters, which I found somewhat troubling.

    Dave

  • 14 - Lumpy

    May 20, 2007 at 4:23 pm

    Seems to me that yard signs like this are less about issues and more about exclusion or offending your neighbors. Kind of like burning a cross on their lawns. In this case it's like saying 'republicans get out' of the neighborhood.

  • 15 - MCH

    May 20, 2007 at 10:48 pm

    "...and Democrats loath the military and demand retreat and defeat..."

    The Republicans have had their share of those who "loath the military," considering all the conservative chickenhawks who dodged the draft during Vietnam:
    Dick Cheney
    John Ashcroft
    Newt Gingrich
    Paul Wolfowitz
    Rush Limbaugh
    Trent Lott
    Dick Armey
    Tom DeLay
    Phil Gramm
    Ken Starr
    Bill O'Reilly
    (to name a few...)

  • 16 - MBD

    May 20, 2007 at 11:32 pm

    Let's not forget pres-wannabe Rudy...

    After receiving several deferments as a student, Giuliani applied for an occupational deferment as a law clerk, but his application was rejected. Giuliani appealed their decision, and asked the federal judge he was clerking for to petition the draft board for him. Which the judge did.

    Having judges as friends is always a good idea.

    "9-11 hero" Rudy's excuse for evading service in Vietnam was for "strategic and tactical” reasons.

    Similiar to chickenhawk Cheney.

  • 17 - Dave Nalle

    May 20, 2007 at 11:50 pm

    How about you keep your pathetic, self-serving and irrelevant bullshit to a more appropriate thread, three-initial guys?

    MCH, as far as I'm concerned you failed your duty to the country by not avoiding and/or protesting the draft and taking the easy way out by joining and taking a non-combat tour. Any rational person with balls would have stayed out of the military during the Vietnam war.

    BTW, only two of the democrats running for president served in the military and both were in non-combat positions. Kucinich actually got a deferment because he was serving in public office, a draft-dodge which LBJ had the decency not to use when he was a congressman.

    In a time when the vast majority of the population has no military experience and had no obligation to serve or took a legal and legitimate alternative route, it's ridiculous to cosider military service an essential qualification for anything.

    Dave

  • 18 - MBD

    May 21, 2007 at 12:18 am

    "In a time when the vast majority of the population has no military experience and had no obligation to serve or took a legal and legitimate alternative route, it's ridiculous to cosider military service an essential qualification for anything."

    The problem with this bullshit is that millions of Americans obeyed the draft law to serve and entered the military long before it became obvious the Vietnam War was lost.

    Only two Senators voted against the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution.

    Did the chickenhawks of both parties actually agree with those two senators or is that now just more shit from birds of the same feather?

  • 19 - Dave Nalle

    May 21, 2007 at 12:30 am

    Sorry I even responded. You want to discuss Vietnam, go write an article about it, MBD. Make sure to pack as much of your bigoted bullshit as possible into it.

    Dave

  • 20 - MBD

    May 21, 2007 at 12:42 am

    Very profound response!

    Is that the best you can do?

    The obvious answer is yes.

  • 21 - STM

    May 21, 2007 at 12:50 am

    The only yard sign I ever want to see (unless it's on my house):

    "FOR SALE, beautiful California bungalow, plenty of original features, lovingly cared for, quarter-acre-plus level block, four bedrooms, ensuite, walk-in wardrobes, polished wood floors, large pool, manicured gardens, garage plus covered carport, close to shops, trains, buses, freeways, top schools, CBD, harbour and beaches - and $300,000 under market price thanks to the generosity of the owners, who have decided that screwing people to get the highest dollar amount isn't everything in life."

    That, I'd like to see.

  • 22 - Dr Dreadful

    May 21, 2007 at 1:05 am

    Sold!

  • 23 - STM

    May 21, 2007 at 1:15 am

    With bells on, and to the man in the black 'at!

  • 24 - Dave Nalle

    May 21, 2007 at 3:18 am

    Planning on coming back to the promised land, Stan?

    Dave

  • 25 - STM

    May 21, 2007 at 4:05 am

    Nah, I just love the style of California bungalows. They are getting a bit long in the tooth now, but worked perfectly transferred here, because of the similarities in climate between California and the eastern states of Australia. That one is one I looked at a few months back. The houses are designed to be extremely cool in summer and only need ceiling fans to move the air around. Mild winters are no problem: a simple gas heater will do the job.

    I will give you buggers this: you are good at designing stuff that actually works.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 29, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs