Yankee Bridges Falling Down - Page 2

$25 billion in 1956 roughly equals $185 billion in 2006 dollars, or roughly the amount necessary (according to The Congressional Budget Office) to keep only 75,000 US troops in Iraq for one year.

But dare we trust our national security to a system rife with rot and ruin? The causes of today's catastrophe combined the D- waterway infrastructure and the D roads, both certainly in worse shape than when Eskew issued his 2006 call to the American business leaders to wield their influence with national, state, and local government officials to fund improvements in America's transportation network. He wasn't the only one raising a hue and cry.

Hmmmm... just WHERE can billions of dollars be found that can be taken away from an unnecessary exercise that can be applied to the real threat facing this nation? Do the words "lied us into war" help direct your attention? If you are an honest person, you will agree that it does. Then ask yourself this question: What is the point to controlling the world's oil if there is nothing suitable on which to operate oil-thirsty heavy traffic?

That is certainly just one of the questions that the ASCE continues to ask [scroll down for numerous and recent commentary features]. Halliburton and the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy should have to dig the deepest of all to repair the damage they helped to cause.

Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for realist

Article Author: Realist

You don't have to be Pessimist to become Realist - but it certainly helps!

Visit Realist's author pageRealist's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - Dr Dreadful

    Aug 02, 2007 at 12:03 am

    Re: my comment #3 on the other post on the subject of the bridge collapse: That goes for you too, Realist.

  • 2 - gonzo marx

    Aug 02, 2007 at 12:18 am

    gotta agree...poor taste is putting it mildly

    completely fucked is about correct

    Excelsior?

  • 3 - Max Neocon

    Aug 02, 2007 at 1:09 am

    Nobody "lied us into war" and the only people responsible for the bridge collapse thus far are the inspectors who looked at it last year and said it was still safe...they are to blame. [Gratuitous vulgarity deleted by Comments Editor.]

  • 4 - Dave Nalle

    Aug 02, 2007 at 5:07 am

    If they wanted money to repair and maintain the bridge, there's plenty being used to build completely unnecessary highways here in Texas.

    Dave

  • 5 - Anchorage Activist

    Aug 02, 2007 at 6:02 am

    Good to see someone else picked up on the ASCE 2005 Survey. When I Googled "America's Crumbling Infrastructure", the survey url came up on the first page.

    I noticed that no mainstream media outlet has even referred to it in their reportage yet. Our media just can't resist sacrificing substance for sensation. The $1.6 trillion would be available had we obeyed George Washington's counsel to avoid entangling alliances. Our priorities are so misplaced.

  • 6 - Ruvy in Jerusalem

    Aug 02, 2007 at 7:54 am

    Realist,

    I would have waited a day with this particular story. Unlike Bambenek's satire, this piece has the redeemiong quality of outrage.

    One of the sidebars at the S'trib alluded to the survey you mention above. But i was trying to get a story written and the S'trib wanted me to log-in with a code name and all that other garbage; I don't have time for a zillion code names and passwords - can't keep track of them all.

    Not a bad job - but for the timing...

  • 7 - Nancy

    Aug 02, 2007 at 9:17 am

    What's truly tasteless is the rush by the local MSM to drum up business by compulsive, continuous speculating that local bridges are next. This sort of yelling 'fire' in a crowded theatre should be illegal, IMO. However, Realist certainly has a point, that if BushCo hadn't lied, cheated, & connived their way into this faux war to enrich their oil-company cronies, the US would have several billion to spend on its own citizens, instead of wasting it on Iraq. For that matter, John B. has a point also. I don't know that I'm all that offended, on second thought, with these blogs. People ARE going to discuss the matter. At least on this blogsite, no one is making money off it, which is the big difference between John & Realist, & the politicians & MSM.

  • 8 - bliffle

    Aug 02, 2007 at 1:21 pm

    Dave sez: "If they wanted money to repair and maintain the bridge, there's plenty being used to build completely unnecessary highways here in Texas."

    To say nothing of a Bridge To Nowhere in alaska.

  • 9 - bliffle

    Aug 02, 2007 at 1:28 pm

    Max sez: "Nobody "lied us into war" ...".

    Sure they did. Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Powell. They knew the whole WMD thing was untrue from their special DIA organization. Then they setup the hapless hopeless CIA and Tenant to take the fall. If the WMD were not a pretext they would have pulled out a month after the invasion.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 23, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs