Today's bridge collapse in Minneapolis brought back the memory of a warning issued by someone who should know against the decayed condition of American roads, bridges, and waterways.
In a previous incarnation, I looked at this issue, which Trish over at Pensito Review blamed on Bush's tax cuts. (Once all of the neo-anderthals have rushed over to their keyboards to defend The Deciderer, I'll resume.)
Sure, this assertion could be dismissed as mere liberal fulmination by those who don't want to admit that Dubya's Terror War For Oil led to unnecessary American deaths. But they should listen to one of their own desired economic class.
"... let's put it this way: if your kids brought home report cards like this, someone would be grounded... aviation system got a D+; navigable waterways a D-; roads a D, and rails a C-."
Eskew had noted back then that the US economy (and the standard of living which depends upon it) cannot function if the transportation sector isn't up to the demands being placed upon it (the book selections below are partly intended to illustrate the importance of good transportation infrastructure), and that any improvements were going to require huge sums of capital. [July 22, 2007: Watch the video of ASCE again supporting this contention as featured on NBC Nightly News]. The heavy weight and numbers f military vehicles would only bring on final collapse sooner.
Back in 1956, someone certainly knew what can happen when a military is confronted with poor or nonexistent roads. President Eisenhower - while maybe remembering the troubles he had crossing northern France after transiting the defensive bulwarks of Festung Europa - signed a bill committing $25 billion dollars to the construction of the interstate highway system, a vital asset in the conduct of homeland security.