Wit vs. Humor: Why Stephen Colbert's Performance Was Masterful - Page 2

In his book Paradigms Lost, John Simon points out that humor and wit are nearly polar opposites. Humor is inclusive: it invites everyone to join in on the laugh and feel like one of the crowd. Wit is exclusive: it addresses itself only to those who are in the know, and if the other people in the room feel uncomfortable because they don't get it — hey, that's a bonus. Colbert's performance was a display of wit at its most lethally cutting. He went into a room with the most powerful man in the world and his courtiers, and he excluded them from the land of the free and the home of the brave.

If the White House courtiers had an ounce of self-respect, they'd all book a flight to Alaska, find a good-sized ice floe and shove themselves out into the ocean. Instead, they'll just go about their routines. They may walk funny for a little while, after the way they've been used, but after six years of covering the Bush administration, they're probably accustomed to that kind of thing.

Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for steven-hart

Article Author: Steven Hart

Steven Hart is a freelance writer based in New Jersey. He blogs about politics and popular culture at The Opinion Mill. He also blogs about writing and more personal matters at StevenHartSite.

Visit Steven Hart's author pageSteven Hart's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • A Modest Proposal and Other Satirical Works (Dover Thrift Editions) A Modest Proposal and Other Satirical Works (Dover Thrift Editions)

    Treasury of five shorter works by the author of Gulliver’s Travels offers ample evidence of the great satirist’s inspired lampoonery. Title piece plus The Battle of the Books, A Meditation upon a ...

  • Wit Wit

Article comments

  • 1 - Cleve

    May 03, 2006 at 4:50 pm

    The ripples from Colbert's routine are still resounding; people are still digesting what really happened, particularly those that were part of the joke themselves.

    I thought it was a masterful bit of satire myself. It was a blistering and relentless assault, not merely on the President, but on the absurd dance between the administration and the mainstream press and the way they legitimize eachother. And he did it in a way that really provides no possible retort. Much like his show.

    Of course he lost the room almost immediately, but they were never his audience. The one moment of sincerity in the routine was his line: "I have nothing but contempt for these people [gestures to audience]" And everyone knew it. *We* were the audience.

    I could come up with a few critiques. I thought he missed some opportunites on energy; that "mesquite-powered car" bit seemed weak given the ample ammunition this Presidents oil ties and energy policies provide. I also thought the Thomas skit dragged a bit.

    But the specific material wasn't the real humor. The beauty of it was watching that room full of parasites squirm for 20 minutes under an overpowering glare of unapologetic satirical truths, and on that front Colbert delivered in absolute spades. This was one for the history books.

  • 2 - NR Davis

    May 03, 2006 at 5:18 pm

    AFAIC, Colbert is a hero who brought truth to power, if only for one night. That guy has serious guts. I pray he refuses to apologize. And I doubt he would do such a horrible thing.

  • 3 - M4532v

    May 03, 2006 at 5:58 pm

    If you would like to thank Mr. Colbert, you can contribute to the 40,000 that have already done so

  • 4 - Matthew T. Sussman

    May 03, 2006 at 6:15 pm

    Would have been much better if that damn press sec'y video didn't drag on.

    He didn't speak from the gut, like he said. He spoke from the balls.

  • 5 - Silas Kain

    May 03, 2006 at 11:20 pm

    Balls. Something Washington polticians and mainstream press folk alike lack completely. We got what we deserved, America. Unless we take the government bull by the horns and start reacting at the polls it will be business as usual throughout this land. The decline and fall of the United States of America is in progress. We have the power to stem the tide before it is too late.

  • 6 - NR Davis

    May 03, 2006 at 11:58 pm

    "We got what we deserved, America."

    Perhaps you did. Somehow, I doubt that.

  • 7 - drD

    May 04, 2006 at 12:06 am

    Colbert is a hero

  • 8 - Buck Rutledge

    May 04, 2006 at 9:30 am

    He not only slayed the giants, he flayed them...and all in a span of thirty minutes. The Roman satirist Juvenal lives again!

  • 9 - synykyl

    May 04, 2006 at 10:27 am

    Well said. Stephen was not telling jokes, he was throwing darts. And he didn't fall flat, he drew blood.

  • 10 - kate r

    May 04, 2006 at 11:20 am

    This is one of the best summations I've seen in an ocean of 'em. Thanks Mr. H.

    ...although I do like the "went over as well as Martin Luther King speaking at a gathering of the KKK" line, too.

  • 11 - Steven Hart

    May 04, 2006 at 11:32 am

    Re: Matthew Sussman

    Yep, the audition tape gag definitely went on too long, but Helen Thomas was long overdue for some props. The Bushies did everything they could to belittle and marginalize her, and too many other reporters went along with it. I think it was a classy gesture for Colbert to let her in on the action.

  • 12 - Harold

    May 04, 2006 at 11:49 am

    I agree -- the inclusion of Helen Thomas as co-actor was chivalrous, noble, and just. As a politcal gesture it lifted the routine above the merely topical and deeply shamed the malefactors.

  • 13 - Scott Butki

    May 04, 2006 at 4:26 pm

    Great summary.

  • 14 - iceburg

    May 04, 2006 at 8:30 pm

    I loved his whole act, and the Iceburg bit was great. like laugh it up now because your grandchildren won't know what iceburgs are. His entire rip on everybody was great. I'll prolly go back to c-span to watch it again. Colbert Rocks!

  • 15 - RogerMDillon

    May 05, 2006 at 3:08 pm

    Mr Hart, In "Truthiness"? - Stephen Colbert and Comedy as Political Argument Barger attempts to call you out although he misinterpreted what your fine piece was about. I pointed it out to him, but he ignored it, which he usually does when he's wrong.

  • 16 - Steven Hart

    May 05, 2006 at 3:34 pm

    Roger M. Dillon: Thanks for the note. I probably would have missed that post entirely without your alert. Not that I was missing much.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 24, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs