Where Do We Go From Haditha? - Page 3

Author: Q BitPublished: Jun 03, 2006 at 6:56 pm 8 comments

As the Iraq war progressed, the paradigm shift cannot be overlooked, from WMD to freedom, liberty and democracy. Clearly the purpose is served, now that the looters and insurgents enjoy the freedom they never had before, feeling liberated in a true sense, and democracy starts with a puppet government that can only wish to have the power to clean the basement of their own house without asking for US permission.

The bottom line is: the invasion of Iraq has been proved to be a mistake of Vietnamic proportion, and it makes no sense to compound it by keeping the US forces there for an unforeseen time. Deaths will just continue to pile up on both sides.

The Iraq adventure is over. If the Bush administration continues to act like the bullies in the playground, it is time to let them know that in this game lives are lost, and stubbornness serves no purpose.

Get the troops back home and let the Iraqis sort things out themselves. Trust me, the Iraqis will be happy to see you leave and to have the opportunity to get back on their feet.

By the way, if the administration really cares, it can deploy only a fraction of the resources that are being wasted in Iraq, to the mountains of Tora Bora, and hunt for the real terrorists, and not the innocent civilians in Haditha.

Page 1Page 2 — Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Al Barger

    Jun 03, 2006 at 9:48 pm

    Really Q Bit, this is more frankly pointless talking to yourself, reading from your own not very good map with little regard to the actual road in front of you.

    What is the lesson of Haditha, you ask? Why, it's the exact same answer you'd have given anyway. You didn't need a lesson for that, and your judgement has nothing to do with what may or may not have happened there. It's the same boilerplate you would routinely give.

    Plus, it doesn't make sense. That's not even to say that I disagree with your assessment, but it doesn't make sense in its own right. Assume for the sake of argument that our Marines killed two dozen innocent civilians. OK then, we should abandon the other 25 million, cut and run? How does one follow from the other?

  • 2 - Q Bit

    Jun 03, 2006 at 10:16 pm

    AB:

    I'm not saying that because of Haditha, the troops should leave.

    The troops should leave because there's hardly any point of staying there, except more casualties. Is that what you want?

    Staying the course is not helping AB, it's simply hurting.

    What's the worse that could happen if the troops leave? A civil war? Isn't that already happening now? Sometimes, civil wars aid in getting a long term stability. History will attest to that fact.

    The presence of the troops is fuelling the insurgency and we are just playing into the hands of the terrorists.

    Incidents like Haditha only adds to the widespread apathy towards the United States.

  • 3 - Joey

    Jun 04, 2006 at 12:13 am

    I would tend to think that the region is going to remain as unstable as before we entered. Perhaps because of the century's of culture that wrought the current paradigm. I don't see the U.S. making any real progress from here, and upon departure... will leave a huge vortex that will instantly be replaced by the strident, that is to say, those with the quickest feet. Who will that be? The terrorists. They have the agenda, the weaponry, the callusness, the feverpitch, the ability to strike ruthlessly at whomever (man, woman, or child) who gets in their way, or who they can "instruct" in the ways of furthering objectives (i.e. suicide bombers, sappers, etc...). The patriots in Iraq are the terrorists, the common people just hope they don't become collateral damage. That's the common defense... "please God, don't let me be collateral damage... and if I am I pray that it is to further harm the infidel." That's the mindset of courage in that part of the world. And innocent lives will be taken, children will die. Tyrants will rule, and incidious crimes against humanity will continue... as they have for millinia... it's the nature of the region.

    Maybe we thought we could leave a better legacy than that. But there is a curtain of darkness there, of unspeakable hidiousness, and we can't fix that. It's an indelible stain on the population. All we are doing is adding to it, we must exit, take further action here, and be done with the world. We don't belong to the world, and the world doesn't belong to us. We are a separate people should grow to accept that. If the great global experiment teaches us anything, it's that we don't belong out there. Let those out there, remain there. And us, remain here.

  • 4 - Q Bit

    Jun 04, 2006 at 12:50 am

    Joey:

    I don't think if the US troops leave, the terrorists will fill the void. Perhaps, in the beginning but not for a long haul-it's impossible.

    What I am worried about is the role of Iran in the event US troops are not there. The Shiite majority will probably have the power and that's going to be disastrous for the United States and it's policies in the Middle East. It is well documented that the Shiites in Iraq enjoy the blessings of the top Iranian clerics.

    I think the troops are going to stay, like it or not, for a long time, albeit in a much limited role just to keep Iran in check, which is important because of insane ambitions of the Iranian Government.

  • 5 - Kenny

    Jun 04, 2006 at 9:19 am

    I wonder why no one's asking about the 'complicity' of these so-called victims. With the exception of the children, you can make a coherent argument that these adults at least knew (if not participated in) the placing of the IED that started this whole mess. After all, this is an insurgency, and unlike other types of warfare...our enemies are civilians!

    I'm afraid the bad guys are going to get another free-pass from the world media because they're so good at blending in with the local populace (because they are the local's....hmmmm)

  • 6 - Q Bit

    Jun 04, 2006 at 12:59 pm

    Kenny:
    I am sorry, you cannot make that argument coherent because it would probably imply that every Iraqi civilian is a terrorist or an accomplice.

    That's not true.

  • 7 - Al Barger

    Jun 04, 2006 at 2:31 pm

    Q Bit- For my money, I'd say you're making your argument better in the comments (particularly #2) than in the original story- probably mostly by brevity. Throwing in the kitchen sink doesn't help you. All the Freudian crap about Bush and his Daddy, for example, actively detracts from arguments that perhaps otherwise have some merit.

  • 8 - Q Bit

    Jun 04, 2006 at 4:38 pm

    AB:
    Sometimes it helps to trace the roots.

    I do agree that it could hv been shortened.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Feb 14, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for January

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs