Tory or Liberal?

I have always tried to keep an open mind when it comes to politics. After all, partisanship taken to a fanatic and frenetic level is not what a pundit - or any voter - should pursue. Last year, I was in the fortunate position to get an inside look into both the Conservative Party of Canada and Liberal Party of Canada (as part of a “blogging experiment”). In the process, I got to mingle with Tories and Liberals at various events, making friends in both parties and also getting a feel for what goes on inside these two federal parties.

What struck me the most was that Liberals actually have a lot in common with Tories, even though the official policies of the Liberal Party would tell you otherwise. For example, at Liberal events I attended, Liberals were as outraged at Canada’s dysfunctional immigration policy as some of the “worst” Conservatives. Liberals, too, feel that the immigrants we take in should be able to speak the language, integrate and contribute to our society - even Anne McLellan, former (Liberal) Deputy Prime Minister, said so in so many words. But official party policy remains silent on the issue, at least under the current Liberal Party brand.

Also, when you mingle with Liberals in Alberta, you’ll also find that a lot of their members are provincial Tories. Maybe it’s true and Ralph Klein, Alberta's long-serving premier, is also a federal Liberal.

One woman in our constituency, who is a devout Conservative, provincially and federally, told me today that she really did not care whether the Tories or the Liberals were in power, but that she had not voted Liberal because of the Liberals’ corruption and lack of honesty. If the Liberals were more honest, she said, there would be little to no difference between them and the Tories, and I have to agree with her. Given Prime Minister Harper’s record so far, one cannot help but label him “Liberal Lite”.

Then again, that these two parties are separated by a fine line only should not be surprising: after all, both parties adhere, or claim to adhere, to the principles of liberalism, which Random House Dictionary defines as “a political or social philosophy advocating the freedom of the individual, parliamentary systems of government, nonviolent modification of political, social, or economic institutions to assure unrestricted development in all spheres of human endeavor, and governmental guarantees of individual rights and civil liberties.” The only problem with the current Liberal brand, apart from its inherent corruption, is that the party has moved too far left in recent years, toward statism (i.e., excessively Big Government) and, thus, away from true liberalism.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for werner-patels

Article Author: Werner Patels

Werner Patels is a freelance translator, interpreter, pundit and writer in Calgary, Alberta. He holds degrees in translation/languages and political science. Werner Patels is a Canadian citizen with an extremely international background: he spent many …

Visit Werner Patels's author pageWerner Patels's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - Kold

    Jun 30, 2006 at 10:35 pm

    Easy. Read and follow my novel.

  • 2 - Coward

    Jul 01, 2006 at 10:01 am

    You're right. We're all people. The problem is that Consevatives deny the existance of something called fact. The racist/discriminant undertones really don't have a place in Canada, either. Trudeau = best. Chretien = preserver. Martin = crap.

    The reason people that vote for Klein in Alberta would vote Liberal is because they've seen the fiscal mismanagement that plagued key members of Harper's cabinet when they were under Mike Harris (or just Brian Mulroney, who runs the job now, again, grr). Bush is the same thing. The notion of a "fiscal convervative" is essentially taken up by the Liberals, while Conservatives fill the roll of tax-cutting military spending nut job.


    Thank goodness for Cancon and anything else that preserves Canadian industry. Certainly Free Trade and Softwood lumber aren't going to be it ...

  • 3 - Ruvy in Jerusalem

    Jul 03, 2006 at 2:16 pm

    This made an interesting read. While my knowledge of Canadian politics is limited, made even more so by the radical partisan restructuring over the last decade and a half, like you I've had the opportunity to get close to both Democrats and Republicans in Minnesota. Maybe it has changed, but in Minnesota at least, you could really tell the difference between Democatic politics and Republican politics. In Minnesota, at least in the very late '90s' and 2000, conservatism was at the heart of politics for Republicans. This was not so for the Democrats at all.

  • 4 - Mark Edward Manning

    Jul 07, 2006 at 3:23 am

    One - Alberta tends to be the most conservative province in Canada, so my guess is that they'll remain so and go Conservative.

    Two - If you're asking which way should Canada go, I thought that was already settled? Stephen Harper, of the Conservative party, won the Canadian election.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Feb 11, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for January

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs