Tiananmen Square: 20 Years Later - Page 3

Determining the number of people killed in Tiananmen Square is difficult. Some hypothesize that troops burned many of the bodies to destroy verification of the killings. The Chinese government continues to stem information of the Tiananmen Square massacre, offering its own approximation in the form of an “official figure” of 241 dead with 7,000 injured.

The Tiananmen Square massacre stands as a testament to the power of images and the power of the press. Having been invited to China to cover the visit of Gorbachev, many foreign press outlets were in an ideal position to cover the site. One wonders how much worse things could have been had the press not been present at all. International press was silenced during the Beijing crackdown, as the Chinese government shut off all satellite transmissions.

The Chinese government vigorously censors much of the dialogue about Tiananmen Square. The Square is closely guarded on and around June 4 of every year to contain further protests or gatherings. Journalists are also barred from the Square.

Organizations like the Tiananmen Mothers attempt to circulate petitions regarding the events, but this information rarely reaches any mainstream Chinese media outlets.

Today, on the 20th anniversary of the massacre, the Chinese government has restricted access to overseas websites including Twitter and has shut down television broadcasts from CNN and other news stations regarding the events in 1989. While there has been some progress and, arguably, less censorship in 2009 than previous years, many sites are still blocked.

Some student protesters from the massacre have been detained and deported, too,

June 2, 2009, marked a meeting between U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and Chinese President Hu Jintao to discuss a “stronger cooperative relationship.” As the United States highlights the events of Tiananmen Square with attempts to fortify economic ties and improve “strategic dialogue” while recognizing China’s policy of censorship and oppression, the calls to reveal the names of the dead ring fairly hollow.

In fairness, pressure from the international community and some of China’s closest allies doesn’t seem to make much of a difference with a government still focused on suppressing information and repressing  the voice of its people.

Page 1Page 2 — Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for jordan-richardson

Article Author: Jordan Richardson

Jordan Richardson is a Canadian freelance writer and ne'er-do-well. He writes stuff here and here.

Visit Jordan Richardson's author pageJordan Richardson's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found

Article comments

— go to most recent comments
  • 1 - Baronius

    Jun 04, 2009 at 10:01 am

    Thanks for writing this article.

  • 2 - Jeannie Danna

    Jun 04, 2009 at 10:47 am

    Hi Thought you might like this great article and so many interesting links I had to pull my way back out so I could write to you...:) I heard once that tank man either died or was in prison. I don't want to believe this.:(

  • 3 - El Bicho

    Jun 04, 2009 at 4:26 pm

    Nice piece, Jordan. Regrettably too many people would rather have nice, cheap things rather than stand up and sacrifice for their fellow human beings.

  • 4 - Dr Dreadful

    Jun 04, 2009 at 4:54 pm

    Like computers made in China.

  • 5 - Jordan Richardson

    Jun 04, 2009 at 5:37 pm

    I don't know what happened to Tank Man, Jeannie. There are a few theories and rumours, but nothing substantial. I think he was whisked away by Chinese police pretty quickly after his heroic act. Some say he was immediately executed.

    Whatever happened to him, he remains a symbol for heroism and bravery. Watching that video gave me chills.

  • 6 - Clavos

    Jun 04, 2009 at 5:39 pm

    Regrettably too many people would rather have nice, cheap things rather than stand up and sacrifice for their fellow human beings.

    Including every last one of our craven politicians.

  • 7 - Baronius

    Jun 04, 2009 at 5:41 pm

    But how exactly can I stand up for the people of China? I avoid Chinese goods whenever possible. What that usually means is, I'll put something back on the shelf and try to find it at another store, but if it's something I need I'll buy it at store #2. Whoop-de-doo. That'll change the world.

    I support candidates who talk about human rights, and that's something, but the Chinese government is so evil (and big and distant) that there's not much I can do. Jordan did the most important thing, putting this article on the internet. If it sneaks past totalitarian Google, then it will let the Chinese people know: we remember; the people of the West will do what we can.

  • 8 - roger nowosielski

    Jun 04, 2009 at 5:50 pm

    Very good points, Baronius. I, too, avoid Chinese goods like a plague. Practically everything that Wal-Mart carries these days is made in China. Yet, people keep on swarming there like there was no tomorrow.
    Unfortunately, we do seem to need China to get out from under the hole we've dug out for ourselves. That's the purpose of, is it Geithner? recent visit.

  • 9 - Jeannie Danna

    Jun 04, 2009 at 6:01 pm

    We should all be tank man! Stand up to corporate America and stay the hell out of Wal-Mart! They stopped buying American products ages ago. Of course I'm not referring to Amazon.com :)

  • 10 - Jordan Richardson

    Jun 04, 2009 at 6:03 pm

    I get that it doesn't seem like there's much a single person can do, but when there are lots of "single persons" operating in similar fashion I think it can make a difference.

    I think real change happens slowly and sometimes quietly in the hearts and minds of our children and of their children's children. If they see us refusing to act simply because we don't think it'll make a difference, they won't act. And if they won't act...well, you get the picture.

    It is a matter of, like B said, doing what we can when we can do it. We must never be discouraged to act, we must never stop striving to do more.

    Personally my wife and I boycott Wal-Mart and most box stores as much as we can. We don't purchase Chinese goods (we buy local whenever we can) and we attempt to learn as much as possible and continue the spread of dialogue. It's easy to allow ourselves and others to fall into the trap of hopelessness and to feel like our actions, small as they are, are just a drop in a bucket.

    But sometimes a drop at a time is the only way to fill that bucket, I guess (cheesy as it sounds), and there's no way I'd ever stop trying to do more, to do better.

  • 11 - Jeannie Danna

    Jun 04, 2009 at 6:15 pm

    Yes, I know what your saying every little step helps even if it's only one or two people at first we are all basically like sheep, no offense to sheep, but we do what we see others do. I started carrying my own shopping bags about six months ago,we are really behind the times around here, and people looked at me like I was a cyclops! Now, I see bags for sale in the stores and other people bringing in their own..:)

  • 12 - roger nowosielski

    Jun 04, 2009 at 6:16 pm

    Well, Jordan. I happen to be stuck in Hopkinsville, KY (Christian County) - a rural town - and Wal-Mart is the greatest operating concern. It had practically driven all small and local retailers out of business, made downtown and Main Street into a ghost town - with the result that apart from one Starbucks, it's the town's "cultural center."

    Doesn't say much for that part of KY.

  • 13 - roger nowosielski

    Jun 04, 2009 at 6:18 pm

    BTW, Jeannie & Jordan,

    Heard something interesting the other day -

    Acting out/on your value system is a form of prayer.

  • 14 - roger nowosielski

    Jun 04, 2009 at 6:22 pm

    #11,

    Good point, Jeannie. But what can we do about the incorrigibles on the BC Politics site?

  • 15 - Jeannie Danna

    Jun 04, 2009 at 6:24 pm

    I have this little saying that only seems to make sense to me. Do you want to hear it? Well here it goes.
    "You are only as free as your country is strong."
    This means that not only do you need laws, but you need to make those laws to look out for the individual as well as the whole. Not the special interest groups or the wealthiest party.

  • 16 - roger nowosielski

    Jun 04, 2009 at 6:28 pm

    Great point again.

    And you might add that the country is as weak as its weakest link, no?

  • 17 - Jeannie Danna

    Jun 04, 2009 at 6:32 pm

    I heard Ron Paul the other night wanting to dis-ban everything and get rid of the government. Ha! No department of Agriculture. Want some E-coli? No department of Education. We've seen the cretins here that slipped through the cracks. Give me a break!

  • 18 - Jeannie Danna

    Jun 04, 2009 at 6:33 pm

    Roger! you remember.

  • 19 - Jeannie Danna

    Jun 04, 2009 at 6:35 pm

    Is Jordan typing a long answer or has he left his own thread?

  • 20 - Jeannie Danna

    Jun 04, 2009 at 6:38 pm

    Roger, I read your article and left a comment...

  • 21 - roger nowosielski

    Jun 04, 2009 at 6:43 pm

    I'm aware, Jeannie. The reason I didn't respond because I don't want to antagonize you. What I did there was a thought-experiment of sorts?

    What did you mean by "you remember"?

  • 22 - roger nowosielski

    Jun 04, 2009 at 6:44 pm

    Also, could you explain your #17 better. I'm not certain I'm getting your point.

  • 23 - Clavos

    Jun 04, 2009 at 6:45 pm

    But what can we do about the incorrigibles on the BC Politics site?

    Mind your own fuckin' business?

  • 24 - roger nowosielski

    Jun 04, 2009 at 6:53 pm

    Why a question mark?

  • 25 - Clavos

    Jun 04, 2009 at 6:54 pm

    I'm open to suggestions?

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 27, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs