The Osama Death Photo: Why do You Need to See It? - Page 2

Part of: There, I Said It!

I am sure that if given a choice, a prosecuting attorney would rather have the mountain of evidence that accompanied the identification of Bin Laden rather than one photo.

If in the American legal system, the steps taken in identifying the body would prove beyond a reasonable doubt that it was in fact Osama Bin Laden if this were a court case, why is this suddenly not acceptable in the court of public opinion?

I understand why certain members of the media may want a picture. After all, being the outlet that obtains them first would likely be a ratings coup. But why does the average person need to see them? I am not talking about those who lost loved ones in the September 11th attacks. I mean, why does everyone else need to see them when in general, the pictures of other criminals or terrorists killed after a raid are not shown to the general public?

In short, I respect the decision not to release the photos, as the reasoning for not doing so is in keeping with past precedent and given the other factors involved in the identification of the body, I am satisfied with the information I have been presented. Again, if this were a court case, the prosecution would have proven its case to me.

Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Nancy

    May 06, 2011 at 10:08 am

    I believe the SEAL's killed SOMEONE. However. This could just have easily been a body double instead of Bin Laden. Saddam Hussein had one, so why not the guy behind 9/11? What the public has seen is a bloody compound. Okay.... something bad happened. The fact Hussein had a trial and Bin Laden did not is also troubling to me.

  • 2 - Dr Dreadful

    May 06, 2011 at 10:42 am


    I believe the SEAL's killed SOMEONE. However. This could just have easily been a body double instead of Bin Laden.


    This line of argument will become less and less convincing the longer amount of time elapses without al-Qaeda releasing a video of bin Laden saying, "Ha ha! Fooled you!"

    The fact Hussein had a trial and Bin Laden did not is also troubling to me.

    Saddam surrendered to those who found him. Bin Laden, by all accounts, did not.

  • 3 - Matt Caverhill

    May 06, 2011 at 12:53 pm

    Nancy, that is yet another reason why photographic evidence of Bin Laden's death could potentially be suspect as a sole indication of his identity. That is why DNA testing along with other forms of identification.

    Al Qaeda also released a statement today confirming that Bin Laden is dead (and that they are working on reprisal attacks, but I think that part was a given).

  • 4 - Paul

    May 15, 2011 at 2:00 pm

    Nonsense... They had no obl DNA only his sisters. Only proves body was related...

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 18, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs