The New American Union

Part of: Election 2012

Benito Mussolini once said: “Fascism should rightly be called Corporatism, as it is the merger of corporate and government power.”

As a child I was taught against Communism, Socialism, and Fascism. These were horrendous words, almost dirty. We were taught against Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, and Benito Mussolini. America was about freedom and the U.S. Constitution that protected it. We were capitalists. We were a democracy. We were honest and didn’t propagandize as did the Communists.

At eight years old, while sitting under my desk during a "Red Attack” drill, I began to question our honesty and our use of propaganda. I sat under a wooden desk to protect myself from a nuclear bomb. That made just as much sense as hiding under a tarp during a tornado. It was then, sitting under that desk, I knew our government was trying to use fear to control our beliefs.

Every election year the conservatives proclaim their beliefs and use God as their resource. They preach against moral decline. Abortion, gay rights, and the new one, birth control, become the tools used to suck in the religious believers. Clearly, they believe, with the high moral code of the conservative base, the liberals are casting the nation to Hell. The message becomes: “A vote for a Republican is a vote for God.” Unfortunately, the voters don’t see the hidden agenda.

The bills that are being pushed by the conservative base are anti American, anti Constitution, anti workers rights, anti poor and anti elderly. They want to cut public aid to the poor and tax the elderly. They want to gut Social Security, on the premise that it’s a drag on our economy. Would it be an issue if we didn’t rob Social Security of its $4.6 trillion surpluses? If we rid ourselves of Social Security do the conservatives believe it’s a way of alleviating the debt owed? If we rid ourselves of workers’ rights will America be a better place? We can get rid of the better paying jobs, health insurance, OSHA, and have lots of low paying jobs. Who does that benefit? I believe it would only help big business flourish without any limits. There is a large union forming and it isn’t between the working people and their employers.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for pam-messingham

Article Author: Pam Messingham


Hi, my name is Pam. I am an independent liberal. I believe in the protections and freedoms granted, and "supposedly protected," by the U.S. Constitution. I will promote Mom and Pop shops over "Corporate America." I am soft hearted, therefore …

Visit Pam Messingham's author pagePam Messingham's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

— go to most recent comments
  • 1 - Glenn Contrarian

    Apr 20, 2012 at 12:44 pm

    Pam -

    Great article - and a lot of people don't realize that the real fascists were not the Germans under Hitler, but the Italians under Mussolini. And the conservatives and Republicans really don't comprehend how close their bringing us to the model of fascist Italy.

  • 2 - Frivolous D

    Apr 20, 2012 at 12:49 pm

    Hi Pam,

    I've come to believe that the conservative base may, indeed, love America more than the rest of us. It's only the people in it that they hate.

    I'm also a new BC writer but I learned pretty quickly that those duck and cover skills may come in handy in the comments.

    Cheers.

  • 3 - Frivolous D

    Apr 20, 2012 at 12:53 pm

    Oops, I so busy trying to be clever that I forgot to say the obvious:

    Nice article.

  • 4 - Pam Messingham

    Apr 20, 2012 at 1:56 pm

    Glenn: Thanks. No, people don't see it. They are getting sucked in with the "free ride" motto of the conservatives.
    Friv: I don't understand the duck and cover statement...explain. Thanks!

  • 5 - Frivolous D

    Apr 20, 2012 at 3:51 pm

    It was a reference to your "Red Attack" drill. Millions were taught to "Duck and Cover" in the event of a nuclear attack.

    I was also alluding to a couple of other article's comment threads where the exchanges got spirited but, like nuclear war, are inevitably a lose-lose exchange.


  • 6 - Igor

    Apr 20, 2012 at 4:05 pm

    Good article.

    Indeed, the Radical Right cares more for their abstraction of America than they do for the American people.

  • 7 - Dr Dreadful

    Apr 20, 2012 at 5:23 pm

    My formal education, which took place in the southern suburbs of London, England, lasted from 1971 to 1984. I don't recall doing a single nuclear attack drill. Our entire awareness on the subject was a screening of the 1960s docudrama The War Game, which our headmaster grumpily informed us beforehand was "a piece of left-wing propaganda".

    I think by that stage, the local education authority had come to the conclusion that there was absolutely no point: we were less than ten miles from central London and the city was known to be targeted by at least ten nukes, possibly many more. We would have been, for a millisecond or two at least, toast.

    One of the high schools I attended was next to a fire station, and the brigade used to occasionally test the early warning siren the building was equipped with - without prior warning, which used to scare the willies out of everybody.

  • 8 - Frivolous D

    Apr 20, 2012 at 5:55 pm

    Dr D,

    I grew up in Milwaukee, WI which was an 'A' list nuclear target. (Come to think of it, the only A list I've ever been on). When I was in grade school during the sixties, I remember liking to watch the defensive missiles swiveling on their mounts from my classroom window.

    I went from kindergarten through high school with the full understanding that I could be vaporized at any particular moment.

  • 9 - Frivolous D

    Apr 20, 2012 at 6:00 pm

    If there is only one movie to watch about the cold war era, it would be "Dr Strangelove."

  • 10 - Frivolous D

    Apr 20, 2012 at 6:55 pm

    Back to Pam's article, though...

    I've always had a healthy suspicion of large corporations. I was first introduced to the threat (in 1974?) when Ford was exposed for their chilling decision that it would be cheaper to settle wrongful death claims than to fix a literally fatal flaw in the Pinto. Ralph Nader gets his props for that one.

    Fundamentally, I don't see corporations and the government as "in bed together" so much as I see them in a "grudging co-dependance." However, it is pretty friggin' alarming when the entire constituency of the Republican Party recognizes corporations as people.

    Now if you ask me who do I trust more with something such as health care? I still trust the government more for two reasons: First is that they don't have a profit motive. (I guess that means I would rather die from incompetence rather than greed). Second, higher accountability and transparency.

    With all of that in mind, I can't remember if it was Glenn or Dr. D who goes for the Goldilocks rule for government. Not too big and not too small. This describes me pretty well and I have a similar sentiment for corporations... I don't particularly trust them but neither do I uniformly demonize them. (Financial industries exempt - demonize away.)

    “Fascism should rightly be called Corporatism, as it is the merger of corporate and government power.” Never heard that before. Good one!

  • 11 - Pam Messingham

    Apr 21, 2012 at 5:49 am

    Watching the missles turn...I've seen that, as well, and it is "scary" to a point. You are certainly aware of their power when you see it. Free countries shouldn't teach against any form of government...it should be your right to choose...right? I would assume so. But in reality who is free? In Michigan, the laws that are being passed show a huge merger of State/Corporate. The governor just signed a bill to make it illegal for lab assistants to form a union. He has taken 1.8 billion from our budget to give big corporatations a tax break and he replaced it with a tax on the retirement checks of the elderly and, get this, education. Yeah, it's getting pretty bad. And Hey...thanks for the compliments!

  • 12 - Warren Beaty

    Apr 21, 2012 at 7:44 am

    Pam, you say, "The message becomes: “A vote for a Republican is a vote for God.” Unfortunately, the voters don’t see the hidden agenda." For all of us conservatives out here, can you please elaborate on the hidden agenda? Or is "Fascism" the hidden agenda?

    You continue, "The bills that are being pushed by the conservative base are anti American, anti Constitution, anti workers rights, ...." Elaboration, please. Or is that just your opinion?

    You continue, "They want to gut Social Security,...." You may find this source interesting, particularly this quote that appears about 3/4th of the way down in the source: No change in Social Security spending, but a requirement that the President and House and Senate leadership submit plans to assure the program's sustainability

    You continue, "We can get rid of the better paying jobs, health insurance, OSHA, and have lots of low paying jobs. Who does that benefit?" You may find this source interesting, - or not.

  • 13 - Glenn Contrarian

    Apr 21, 2012 at 8:07 am

    Gee - wonder where the BC conservatives are on this article?

  • 14 - Glenn Contrarian

    Apr 21, 2012 at 8:23 am

    Ah - Warren posted a reply just as I posted one!

    Um, Warren -

    For all of us conservatives out here, can you please elaborate on the hidden agenda? Or is "Fascism" the hidden agenda?

    Warren, "Fascism" was never the conservatives' "hidden agenda"...it's just that y'all are so up in the aire about upholding the profit motive and protecting Big Business, and y'all simply don't realize that such a political model has been tried before by a guy named Mussolini. It's not maliciousness on the part of conservatives - it's simple ignorance.

    And looking at the last paragraph in your reply:

    You continue, "We can get rid of the better paying jobs, health insurance, OSHA, and have lots of low paying jobs. Who does that benefit?" You may find this source interesting, - or not.

    That's a wonderful example of why you are the way you are, Warren, because there's NOT ONE SHRED of real evidence or reliable statistics or historical fact in that article - it's one hundred percent rhetoric. No facts, no real MEAT...just rhetoric. But you apparently think that article's sensible and hard-hitting enough to prove your point.

    Rhetoric without facts to back it up is empty rhetoric...but if your use of that link is any indication, empty rhetoric is good enough for Warren World.

  • 15 - Glenn Contrarian

    Apr 21, 2012 at 8:27 am

    And Warren -

    Here's an example of how to include rhetoric that DOES have facts to back it up. You won't like what it says, but unlike your link in comment #12, the author DOES rely on facts to back up his rhetoric.

  • 16 - Pam Messingham

    Apr 21, 2012 at 8:47 am

    Funny Glenn, I just wrote a blog on my cite that is linked to a few local newspapers about the Michigan Govenor. It's written quite differently. I read what you wrote and had to laugh. Thanks! Enough said.

  • 17 - Igor

    Apr 21, 2012 at 9:56 am

    Michigan is an interesting example of runaway Radical Rightism. Michigan has a law that when a new law is passed that 90 days elapse before it's effective, but then they have another law that the wait can be bypassed if a 2/3 majority votes for "immediate effect". Apparently, the republican speaker gavels thru all the new laws that the reps want on just a voice vote for "immediate effect".

    I've seen videos of the legislature passing one after another rightist law by this method without pause.

  • 18 - Pam Messingham

    Apr 21, 2012 at 11:07 am

    Michigan is very scary right now! Igor, yes it's called the two thirds rule for immediate effect...but nobody count...scary!

  • 19 - Igor

    Apr 21, 2012 at 4:32 pm

    #18-Pam: most places in time and geography that's called despotism.

  • 20 - STM

    Apr 22, 2012 at 3:08 am

    Yes, I did nuclear drills too, in early primary school in the early 1960s. It was always a good opportunity for us kids to piss about under the desks and have a good giggle. Our parents were quite serious about it though; in our family my mother especially, as the Nazis had bombed the shit out of her street more than once during the early years of the war when she was a kid (and which she remembered vividly), because it was not far from the big Vickers aircraft factory outside London.

    They only got some respite later in the war when the aircraft being made at Vickers were giving the Nazi pr.cks a nice towel-up as the RAF returned the favour and bombed the living sh.t out of Germany. Sow the wind, reap the whirlwind.

    What? Did they think they were going to do it to everyone else and no one would do it back to them. Another delusion of those believing they were the aryan "master race" while the rest of us were just poor, jew-ridden democracies with nothing better to believe in than the freedom and dignity of all men and women.

    Very cynical, too; prior to the attack on Russia in 1941, the Nazis were allied to the Soviets.

    On reflection regarding the nuke drills, what would getting under a flimsy wooden school desk have achieved with a mega-megatonne Russki or Red Chinese bomb going off a few kilometres away?

    Not much, I'd think, but I suppose they had to give everyone the idea that were at least making an effort to keep us kids safe.

    Anyway, what the f.ck would Warren about fascism (which, as Glenn points out, was actually Italian, Spanish and Portuguese and was extreme right only to the point of putting profits at the top of the state's agenda)?? Naziism was something else again. It had a couple of nastier little components stitched in among its troubling philosophies just for good measure.

    You know, like genocide.

    America's nothing like any of those places, but if you don't watch out, it could be. I have enough faith in ordinary level-headed Americans, though, to believe that will never be the case.

    That is, those Americans whose brains aren't clouded by the recent lurch in the US to the right.

  • 21 - Pam Messingham

    Apr 22, 2012 at 3:22 am

    I don't know, STM, the signing of the NDAA law really baffled me. What a right stripping, anti constitutional, freedom inhibiting law...and it was signed in. They are lurching...hard core! I'm glad you remember hiding under the desk, too. Not many remember. It's getting to the point that the level headed Americans aren't the ones running the country and the ones that run the country don't like the level headed. It's a double edged sword.

  • 22 - Christopher Rose

    Apr 22, 2012 at 4:06 am

    With the benefit of hindsight it really does seem like there has been a concerted and co-ordinated attempt since at least the 1980s to roll back the social emancipation and increased freedom that emerged in the USA and other Western countries after the 2nd World War.

    That misguided effort has turned into something dangerous and threatening to all of us since 9/11.

    It is a bitter irony that a vocal but organised minority is trying - and so far succeeding - to turn the land of the brave, home of the free, into one of the most repressive Western democracies we have ever seen.

  • 23 - Pam Messingham

    Apr 22, 2012 at 4:15 am

    Yes, and the people don't even see it coming. They still buy into the "for your own good" theory. The law makers hide behind the instilled "terrorist fear." The laws don't do anything to the terrorists. The laws just rape us of our Constitutional Rights! I wish the majority would open their eyes, but they are too comfortable where they are. It's very sad....very sad.

  • 24 - STM

    Apr 22, 2012 at 4:17 am

    Pam: It always makes me laugh when hardcore right-wing Americans bang on about rights whilst doing their hardest to rob Americans of a lot of their rights.

    There's a difference between having some conservative political viewpoints - I might have plenty of those too - and lurching away from the centre to too far to the right, to that place where people only pay lip service to rights (if it suits their agenda).

    Americans occupying that very large mainstream area of middle ground on the political spectrum need to band together to make sure that doesn't happen.

    Ignoring the bullsh.t and turning up to vote's a good start ... one can only hope.

  • 25 - Igor

    Apr 22, 2012 at 7:35 am

    The radical right is trying to turn down the vote by passing various voter diminishment laws in the states. Big vote turnouts are inimical to rightist interests.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 20, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs