The Downing Street Memo: All Smoke, No Gun - Comments Page 3

Slowly the controversy grows, taking an innocuous memo and making a big puffy pastry out of it.

Noted socialist columnist and all around buffoon Greg Palast was kind enough to make me aware of the revelation in the Times of London of the so-called 'smoking gun' memo from the British government's briefing by C (the head of MI6) about US plans for action against Iraq.…
Read comments below, or read this article from the beginning.

Article comments

  • 76 - gonzo marx

    May 31, 2005 at 8:37 pm

    Mr Nalle..my sardonic Wit was not aimed at you on this occasion

    i know it is difficult to break olde habits...but believe it or not, i do tend to give you the benefit of the Doubt..

    hence my use of the modifier "some"

    see?..i do learn and Remember..

    {8^P~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Excelsior!

  • 77 - rhino

    Jun 07, 2005 at 9:12 am

    Bush is a fucking criminal
    plain and simple.!
    You Fucking TWITS that basiclly
    lick his boots and support this
    fucking criminal cabal are just as guilty as sin.
    We are many here in the U.S.
    that see through the smoke and mirrors
    of shrubs crimes against our republic.
    It would do you well to wake the fuck up
    for yourselfs before it is too
    late.

    cheers,jeers and beers.

  • 78 - Nancy

    Jun 07, 2005 at 10:24 am

    I'm with sydney 150%. The problem is, it's only a minority seems to be incensed by the blatant lies, spin, stonewalling, and conniving, and some (like Dave) even deny totally that there have been any lies, spin, stonewalling and conniving...or if they admit it, it bothers them not at all - which really is appalling, almost as appalling as the fact that the current administration has no problem resorting to such tactics first instead of last for any situation lately. What is wrong with the public - and the media - that ANY kind of shenanigans such as these are not only tolerated, but shrugged at?! 'Oh, so what - every president has done it'- what kind of attitude is that?! This isn't about partisanship - on my part, anyway - it's about honesty in government and those elected to public office being held to standards of integrity, at least to the people of the country they are supposed to be serving. Bush wants to lie to Korea or the French, fine. He's not president of Korea or France. But to lie to me, or pull the old "from a certain point of view" crap of Obi-Wan Kenobi? That puts him beyond the pale, and as far as I'm concerned, it should put him in front of a firing squad for treason. Furthermore, it kills me to see my former political party hijacked by such scum. They have brought it so low thru their manipulations, it isn't recognizable any more, nor is it viable for anyone having any decency, honor, honesty, or ethics - despite Bush's loud ballyhooing about same. Baloney. Bush wouldn't know honesty or ethics if they leaped up and bit him in the nuts; the history of his dealings throughout his life testifies to this, as does the company he keeps...and I don't refer to Laura.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 09, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs