The Best Kind of Gun Control - Page 2

Throughout my life, I was told that it's near impossible to get a license for a gun, and a CCW (carry license), is impossible unless you are a cop. Yet growing up on the gritty city streets, many of my friends had obtained guns, all illegally. One friend would carry a Tec-9 (a type of machine gun) disassembled in his hipsack. Another sold guns illegally, and had brought with him to work on occasion a 45 semi, .380, and a Tec-22 (similar to the Tec-9 but shooting 22 caliber - smaller and quieter). I've been around people shooting 25 caliber semis in the basements of apartment buildings for target practice, and I've even been shot at once in Bushwick Brooklyn (thankfully they missed).

I could have bought my guns illegally via one of the many channels that are readily available to anyone so inclined. However, I am an upstanding citizen, and I want to abide by the laws. But when it comes to gun laws, I really have to start wondering who the target of those laws are?

In any given state at this moment, there are attempts to limit the number of guns that you can buy or to classify more guns as assault weapons, or to reduce the bullet capacity of magazines even further. Interestingly, none of the friends from my old neighborhood care about the enactment of any such laws, nor will they be affected by them.

My guns came with spent shell casings, which are on file with the government. Should my gun ever be used in a crime, the police can pretty quickly identify where the bullet came from. My fingerprints are on file, as is my picture, address, etc. I keep my guns locked up and safe, and when I take them out, I follow all of the safety rules, NRA, range rules, etc. Many of my gun toting friends from the old hood slept with guns under their pillow. Ask them about NRA Rules and they might ask back, "What are those?"

Does it help the average citizen to face such impediments to owning a gun, even though criminals have absolutely no problem obtaining one for themselves? Did the teens who murdered those four students in Newark, NJ earlier this summer go through the process of obtaining a license for the murder weapons they used? And might those NJ teens still be alive if just one of them happened to have a gun?

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2 — Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for the-obnoxious-american

Article Author: The Obnoxious American

America is the greatest country in the history of mankind. Some might refer to me as the classic "obnoxious American," because I refuse to be ashamed of my country. We've made our mistakes for sure. Yet while no one is perfect, America comes pretty …

Visit The Obnoxious American's author pageThe Obnoxious American's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

— go to most recent comments
  • 1 - Al Barger

    Sep 08, 2007 at 2:10 am

    Obnoxious American - I am Deeply Offended by this article. Your concern for mere reason and the US Constitution are obviously proof that you don't care about The Children. We have to ban guns, because children sometimes get killed with them. But you don't care about that, do you? Shame on you!

  • 2 - Dr Dreadful

    Sep 08, 2007 at 2:19 am

    So where is everybody?

    I imagine they're all still savaging one another on the other gun thread (Mark Schannon's).

    Don't worry, they'll be by shortly.

    :-)

  • 3 - Dave Nalle

    Sep 08, 2007 at 5:34 am

    Nice job personalizing the issue. I wonder if the gun-grabbers will actually be able to say much in response to this.

    Dave

  • 4 - bliffle

    Sep 08, 2007 at 6:25 am

    I just wonder why anyone wants a pistol made out of Stainless Steel. US grade SS, 18/8, is so defined for the benefit of milking equipment by the USDA and is generally a poor material for all but some specialty uses. In particular it's poor for razor blades, knives and deck screws. Hard to machine and form, doesn't hold an edge, ruptures precipitously, hard to weld, but it is good for some high temperature applications and corrosion resistance. Better, I would think, is the European "inoxidable" metal which is non-corrosive, easier to machine and with a satin finish rather than the gleam of 18/8.

  • 5 - Clavos

    Sep 08, 2007 at 10:34 am

    18/8 can be had with any finish, it doesn't need to be shiny.

    18/8 is just one of many grades of stainless. From Wikipedia:

    "Stainless steel's resistance to corrosion and staining, low maintenance, relative inexpense, and familiar luster make it an ideal base material for a host of commercial applications. There are over 150 grades of stainless steel, of which fifteen are most common. The alloy is milled into sheets, plates, bars, wire, and tubing to be used in cookware, cutlery, hardware, surgical instruments, major appliances, industrial equipment, a structural alloy in automotive and aerospace assembly and building material in skyscrapers and other large buildings.

    Stainless steel is also used for jewelry and watches. The most common stainless steel alloy used for jewelry is 316L. It can be re-finished by any jeweler and unlike silver will not oxidize and turn black.

    Stainless steel is 100% recyclable. In fact, an average stainless steel object is composed of about 60% recycled material, 25% originating from end-of-life products and 35% coming from manufacturing processes."



    The European "inox" (short form) is also stainless, and is often 18/8 (particularly in tableware) also.

    One group with which I am familiar that buys stainless weapons almost exclusively is boat owners, for obvious reasons.

  • 6 - The Spin

    Sep 08, 2007 at 10:43 am

    Al Barger's post was most likely meant as sarcasm. But I am serious. It takes A Village to raise The Children. We are and must be The World. All those guns unnecessarily being used at gun ranges are contributing to Global Warming. And what about the Polar Bears ?? Some Crazy Gun Nuts are saying that the answer to the government having such overwhelming superiority is that Citizens should have the right to even more powerful weapons, that when organized into militias they should have automatic weapons, grenade launchers, stinger missiles, armored vehicles, etc depending on the size of the militia. WHAAAAA!!!???

  • 7 - gonzo marx

    Sep 08, 2007 at 10:51 am

    "well regulated Militia"...there's the part to discuss

    nuff said...

    why all the sudden distraction from current real issues to this well beaten horse of a topic?

    curiouser and curiouser...

    Excelsior?

  • 8 - Clavos

    Sep 08, 2007 at 11:04 am

    I think the first article (the theme of which which is somewhat of a perennial, no?) bred this one, as a response, gonzo.

  • 9 - gonzo marx

    Sep 08, 2007 at 11:07 am

    i hear ya, Clovos..but ya know lil ole me..always suspicious

    on topic...best kind of gun control is using two hands, IMO

    Excelsior?

  • 10 - Clavos

    Sep 08, 2007 at 11:14 am

    Gotcha, and roger that, gonzo....(4)

  • 11 - Dave Nalle

    Sep 08, 2007 at 12:50 pm

    gonzo, we only have the articles which we are given to comment on. If you want something else covered, write an article on it or at least suggest it to one of the more active writers.

    Dave

  • 12 - gonzo marx

    Sep 08, 2007 at 1:01 pm

    @ #11 - since my system was just repaired and back online as of yesterday, after a two week hiatus you can well expect more of my weird keyboard peckings

    and i wasn't talking about BC...but a more general overview of pundits from the GOP side of the aisle across a host of media...curious if there is some direction to the shift in the curve, is all..NOT hypothesizing, just mentioning

    no need for the guilty conscience there, Vox..if i wanna yank your chain, you will most definitely know it without Question...as always

    Excelsior?

  • 13 - Dave Nalle

    Sep 08, 2007 at 1:44 pm

    Well, the gun debate was brought up here not by anyone from the GOP, but by our resident lefty Mark Schannon. And as I pointed out on that thread, I don't think there's anything left to debate on the subject.

    The question for you is what you think republican posters would be trying to distract from? What major issue are we neglecting?

    Dave

  • 14 - gonzo marx

    Sep 08, 2007 at 1:46 pm

    /sigh

    i know Mark wrote the first article, and as i have stated..it wasn't a BC phenomena i was referring to

    just...doesn't...matter...

    i'll put up what i think in the coming days/weeks

    Excelsior?

  • 15 - SonnyD

    Sep 08, 2007 at 2:19 pm

    #10 Clavos, that sentence only needed one.

    ....Ducks and runs....

  • 16 - Dr Dreadful

    Sep 08, 2007 at 2:24 pm

    Looking forward to your thoughts, gonzo.

    As I posted on the other thread but never got an impartial answer to, why is it this particular issue which brings the gun lobby descending like a pack of hyenas (and not just to BC, as you said)?

    Why guns? Why not the anti-(or pro-)abortion lobby? Why not the "save marriage" crowd? Why not illegal immigration? These are all very emotive topics and we do get a lot of people expressing strong opinions about them, but just not in the same way/pattern.

  • 17 - moonraven

    Sep 08, 2007 at 2:49 pm

    That OS would have a gun is enough reason to ban all guns forever.

    Incidentally, if you can demonstrate that you know what you are doing with a gun, you can get a permit to carry a concealed weapon.

    I had one when I was an undergraduate--although I never took the .38 derringer out of the drawer of the bedside table.

    When my daughter was born I got rid of my two pistols, a rifle and my husband's shotgun.

    My brother didn't do that. He kept his guns and when his son was 14 an ll-year old neighbor got ahold of one of them and shot my nephew.

    He survived, but he still has the bullet lodged in his spine.

  • 18 - moonraven

    Sep 08, 2007 at 2:53 pm

    Soory about the typo: OA.

  • 19 - Clavos

    Sep 08, 2007 at 2:58 pm

    Touché, Sonny.

    (slinks away to lick wound)

  • 20 - sr

    Sep 08, 2007 at 3:05 pm

    Obnoxious well stated. Your Kimber Gold Match is finer then a beautiful women. Doc everybody went with MJ to Never Land. Clavos, are we now into metallurgy?

  • 21 - Clavos

    Sep 08, 2007 at 3:22 pm

    "Clavos, are we now into metallurgy?"

    No, not at all, sr.

    But I do know a little about stainless (in various grades, according to application), because it's used extensively on boats.

  • 22 - Ms Gunner

    Sep 08, 2007 at 9:46 pm

    How absurd! Your nephew got shot therefore 300 million Americans need to forfeit their constitutional rights. What a crock! Well my nice got killed by a car therefore we need to get rid of all cars. And my best friend’s son drowned in a swimming pool, and therefore we must get rid of all swimming pools. Those who put their emotions before their country’s constitution are doomed, and would prefer to doom their fellow Americans as well.

  • 23 - Dave Nalle

    Sep 09, 2007 at 1:42 am

    It's not openly stated, but everything she posts and her hostility towards all men suggests that he eventually got his shit together and got his freedom. He's probably with a younger woman who has a more sensible attitude about guns now.

    Dave

  • 24 - REMF

    Sep 09, 2007 at 1:53 am

    ^ Nalle's above comment reminds me of the typical gossipy old busy-body woman who doesn't have anything better to do than try and manipulate people against anyone she doesn't like.

  • 25 - sr

    Sep 09, 2007 at 3:00 am

    REMF. Seems to me your trying to do the samething, however without much success.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 11, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs