The ANC Split: Disunity or a Strengthened and Meaningful Democracy

It has long been inevitable that the African National Congress, Africa’s oldest political party, would eventually split. The question has always been when rather than if. The inevitable took place this past week with the launch in Bloemfontein of the Congress of the People; or COPE as it will be known.

Founded in 1912 as the South African Native National Congress and significantly influenced in both style and policy by the slightly older National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) in the United States, the ANC has always been something of an unwieldy organization trying to balance both tradition (it once had a House of Chiefs) and modernity.

By the late thirties it was virtually moribund and, in terms of importance for the liberation struggle, surpassed by several alternate African organizations. In the early forties a group of young militants led by the likes of Nelson Mandela, Walter Sisulu, Anton Lembede and Oliver Tambo took over the ANC’s Youth League and, from this platform, went on to revitalize the entire organization. By the 1950s the ANC was once again the dominant African organization in South Africa.

In the meantime the National Party had come to power (1948) and began to implement the draconian racial separation laws known collectively as apartheid. By the early sixties it had become clear that “civil rights” protests would get nowhere with the hard line racist architects of apartheid. The ANC sent part of its leadership out of the country to represent it in exile. The other faction would begin the internal armed struggle. Mandela was in the latter group: arrested, tried and sentenced to prison where he spent the next three decades.

Simultaneously, the ANC absorbed dissident groups representing various other ethno-national communities (Coloured, Indian and European) and became the main organizational expression of the anti-apartheid movement. Outlawed by the government, the ANC kept its identity in exile but re-surfaced internally in a variety of expressions, the most prominent of which was the United Democratic Front (UDF).

More importantly, the political, social and cultural homogeneity of the African majority was changing markedly. Traditional South African peasant society was significantly supplanted during the first half of the 20th century by an urbanized African proletariat connected initially to the mining industry but, with the growth of the South African political economy, to all sectors of a growing industrial juggernaut; by far the largest economy in Africa. By the early seventies this black proletariat had produced an effective, radical, self-conscious and highly articulate labor movement that eventually coalesced into the Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU).

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2Page 3Page 4
Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - Zedd

    Dec 20, 2008 at 8:56 pm

    Bill,

    Thanks for the article.

    I am very nervous about Zuma. Firstly, I am surprised that a guy with his unrefined (for lack of a better word) tendencies could penetrate the electorate in SA. I don't know much about him but he makes me very nervous. Also the fact that he is Zulu could be problematic. Zulus are immensely proud and love "zuluness". With their large numbers, it may be difficult getting rid of him in the event that he doesn't work out. And off course the African tendency towards protocol and authority figures would make it difficult to get rid of this guy if he turns out to be as wrong for SA as he appears to be at the onset.

    I hope that I am wrong about him.

    However, I am delighted that the ANC is dismantling. There was a danger of it becoming too powerful and the inevitability of SA becoming like every other African country that is monopolized by on party or one leader. Also, it was united around the liberation struggle. I am glad that there will be some pronounced ideological variation that will create competition for power and therefore keep the politicians better behaved.

    So bravo COPE or should I say viva COPE.

  • 2 - Savo Heleta

    Dec 22, 2008 at 11:46 am

    Bill, I agree with you. This can only be good for South Africa.

    In 1994, Nelson Mandela was happy that the ANC did not get over 65% of the vote and could not change the constitution at any point. Mandela wrote in "Long Walk to Freedom" that he was glad that the ANC did not get the absolute majority. However, the ANC got over 65% of the vote in the next elections. The fact that the ANC had such large margins in the polls has caused lots of relaxation in the ANC and led to the lack of service delivery.

    While the ANC will definitely remain the most powerful political party in South Africa, having a strong opposition can only be good. The ANC will have to earn the votes, not only count on them.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 27, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs