Syria and Lebanon - Momentum Taking Over - Page 3

....whatever happens in Lebanon and Syria, the fact that France and the U.S. have lined up together in the cause of freedom is a hopeful sign. What we have now is an imperative for Europe to come up with its own proposals for enlarging liberty in the Middle East. It's not enough to say Iraq was the wrong way; we must go on to suggest the right one. This is an agenda for the whole of the European Union. [LA Times]

Lest the EU, too, be left behind by history - better late than never, I say.

And speaking of even more unlikely supporters battered into line by the gale now blowing: Russia, Egypt and Saudi Arabia have now called for Syria to drag its dead ass out of plucky little Lebanon:

    Bashar al-Assad, the Syrian president, went Thursday to Riyadh, the Saudi capital, hoping to secure Saudi support before a coming Arab summit meeting. But Saudi officials told Reuters and The Associated Press that Crown Prince Abdullah had delivered an unusually blunt rebuff. Egypt, the other key Arab player, has also called for the withdrawal of Syria from Lebanon.

    "The Arabs have taken a stand and the international community have taken a stand," said Joseph Samaha, editor in chief of As Safir, a Lebanese daily. "This means there is no ally left for Syria."

    ....Saudi Arabia's rebuke follows a similar stand by Russia on Wednesday. "Syria should withdraw from Lebanon," Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov told the BBC late Wednesday. "But we all have to make sure that this withdrawal does not violate the very fragile balance which we still have in Lebanon, which is a very difficult country ethnically."

    ....Russia's announcement was in effect a message to Syria that Moscow would not exercise its veto against sanctions in the United Nations Security Council, he added. [NY Times]

Momentum has clearly taken on a life of its own and that is how it works best, but let us not forget the hand that pulled the starter cord.

UPDATE
Bush keeps up the pressure in a NY Post interview:

    "The subject that is most on my mind right now is getting Syria out of Lebanon, and I don't mean just the troops out of Lebanon, I mean all of them out of Lebanon, particularly the secret service out of Lebanon — the intelligence services," he said.

    Continued on the next page Page 1Page 2 — Page 3 — Page 4

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for eric-olsen

Article Author: Eric Olsen

Career media professional Eric Olsen is honored to be the founder and former publisher of Blogcritics.org, and former publisher of Technorati.com, which both rule. He is now editor, co-founder, and CEO of The Morton Report.

Visit Eric Olsen's author pageEric Olsen's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

— go to most recent comments
  • 1 - Mark Schannon

    Mar 04, 2005 at 10:52 am

    Once again, Americans get suckered by faint whisps of democracy rising from the ashes of the Middle East. But who knows, maybe the Bubble Bush Machine (Motto-"What we can't hear can't exist") has stumbled into a policy that works. Does that excuse the lies to the American people about the Iraq war, the thousands dead, the abuses of civil rights, the torture and denial of basic constitutional rights of prisoners, the effect on our ballooning deficit?

    This is an administration without a clear sense of direction or purpose and with no sense of morality or truth.

  • 2 - Tom French

    Mar 04, 2005 at 11:45 am

    Good article and good comment. I feel hopeful that there is good momentum to change the strong religious fundamental control over middle east governments. I'll still reserve my judgement to see what actually happens. Also, the religious fundamental government in the US is troubling.

  • 3 - Eric Olsen

    Mar 04, 2005 at 12:45 pm

    Tom, I respect your open-mindedness. I believe the "religious fundamentalist" aspect of the Bush administration is greatly exaggerated: its central foreign policy tenet is fostering democracy, not Christianity.

    Mark, buried in there somewhere was an acknowledgment that the administration has "has stumbled into a policy that works" - good for you.

  • 4 - jadester

    Mar 04, 2005 at 1:09 pm

    also, i'm almost certain the administration would prefer a friendly non-christian foreign government, to an unfriendly christian one (and regardless of my personal opinion of Bush, this stands to reason for any government of the world)

  • 5 - Eric Olsen

    Mar 04, 2005 at 1:30 pm

    well-put Jadester, you are a sensible man

  • 6 - SFC SKI

    Mar 04, 2005 at 2:29 pm

    To answer your queston, Mark, yes.

    Interesting times, indeed.

  • 7 - Eric Olsen

    Mar 04, 2005 at 2:53 pm

    oh yes, I agree with Ski that the answer is yes

  • 8 - Dan

    Mar 04, 2005 at 3:37 pm

    In time, liberals will simply pretend that democratic change in the middle East was inevitable and would have happened anyway. If they begrudgingly give any credit to the Bush administrations policies at all, it will be to say that it only hastened the change. More likely they will insist that Bush's ham-handed and dangerous policies nearly screwed up this inevitable process and cost unnecessary loss of lives.

    It will be the same historic revisionism they applied to Reagan winning the cold war, and the prosperous "peace dividend" that followed.

  • 9 - Eric Olsen

    Mar 04, 2005 at 3:43 pm

    though there is still a long way to go and the path is frought with ... (blah blah blah), I do feel somewhat personally vindicated by events thus far because I have said all along the most important reason for going into Iraq was to give the region an enema

  • 10 - SFC SKI

    Mar 04, 2005 at 4:00 pm

    Your comment hits to the heart of the matter for me, Eric. Should IRaq be a precedent-setting example for interventionism? No, but this war was a specific response to a much larger threat, and in this case it was the right response in the right place and time, in my opinion.

  • 11 - NC

    Mar 04, 2005 at 4:00 pm

    So then. Does this mean Neal Pollack was wrong? Or is Bush history's first liberationist fascist?

  • 12 - Eric Olsen

    Mar 04, 2005 at 4:04 pm

    thanks Ski, perhaps we should now call ourselves FuckingARightPundits

    NC, don't fascists always call conquest "liberation"? Don't be deceived.

  • 13 - SFC SKI

    Mar 04, 2005 at 4:30 pm

    "FuckingARightPundits"? Can we get shirts made?

  • 14 - NC

    Mar 04, 2005 at 4:30 pm

    Only now do I see the sinister Orwellian double-speak involved in calling the protests in Beirut "pro-democracy."

    McSweeney's 1, NC 0!

  • 15 - Eric Olsen

    Mar 04, 2005 at 4:31 pm

    of course, you can wear yours when you teach

  • 16 - SFC SKI

    Mar 04, 2005 at 4:33 pm

    I am told setting the right tone in the classroom is the key to success.

  • 17 - Eric Olsen

    Mar 04, 2005 at 4:43 pm

    as indeed a shirt such as that would assure

  • 18 - Eric Olsen

    Mar 04, 2005 at 5:11 pm

    UPDATE, Bush keeps up the pressure, see above

  • 19 - NC

    Mar 04, 2005 at 5:15 pm

    FASCISM!

  • 20 - SFC SKI

    Mar 04, 2005 at 5:22 pm

    THat's right NC, we are gonna do it just like Adolf and Benito, move in and depose their oppressors and then make 'em vote and run their own countries so we can go home to some good bar-B-Q and football.

  • 21 - Eric Olsen

    Mar 04, 2005 at 7:21 pm

    all I can say at this point is, push push, in the Bush

  • 22 - RJ

    Mar 05, 2005 at 12:55 am

    Somwhat off-topic:

    Instapundit has been posting a lot of pictures of Lebanese protesters, mostly women. And some of these chicks are hot!

    Who knew?

  • 23 - RJ

    Mar 05, 2005 at 1:05 am

    In time, liberals will simply pretend that democratic change in the middle East was inevitable and would have happened anyway. If they begrudgingly give any credit to the Bush administrations policies at all, it will be to say that it only hastened the change. More likely they will insist that Bush's ham-handed and dangerous policies nearly screwed up this inevitable process and cost unnecessary loss of lives.

    It will be the same historic revisionism they applied to Reagan winning the cold war, and the prosperous "peace dividend" that followed.

    I believe you have hit the nail on the head, my friend...

  • 24 - Triniman

    Mar 05, 2005 at 2:41 am

    I noticed these Lebanese protester-babes from some television footage. Nice to see them again.

  • 25 - Doug Goldstein

    Mar 05, 2005 at 2:52 am

    Eric, I respect your open-mindedness. But, unfortunately you're quite the kiss-up to the softies in this blog, and it's not that I don't believe you will one day truly understand how beautiful America really is, but I'm afraid now is not the time to be reserved and polite to freedom-hating liberals.

    What is with these people against the Iraqi War and against the US? And now against our democratic mission in Syria and Lebanon.

    JUST SOME FACTS ABOUT THE MIDDLE EAST FOR THE FREEDOM-HATERS:

    #1. Like our President has clearly said: Israel (and the US) is a democracy which means it provides freedom for Jews, Christians and Muslims, freedom to equal access of land, food, water, jobs, housing, political positions and national elections for all. Unlike Syria, who occupies Lebanon!!!, Israel (and the US) is a democracy and does not occupy any soverign nation or land because both our President and Sharon believes in freedom for all people. The Israeli military (and the US) does not kill Muslims/Arabs (only if they are terrorists) or foreign journalists or American protesters, and all those incidents you read in the media are either lies you freedom-haters keep referring to or were by accident, and as we all know accidents happen.

    #2: Unlike Iraq, Syria and Iran: Israel does not have any WMD's, or a WMD program of any kind and has proven this fact to the IAEA, the UN, and US inspectors. In fact, they are a shining example of a free democratic nation because they do not try to hide WMD's from the world and allow open inspections whenever requested.

    #4 When our forces were sent to Iraq it was because Saddam Hussein had WMD’s that he planned to launch at the United States after 9/11. Saddam and Osama Bin Laden were going to attack the US again, but this time with nukleur weapons fired from Osamas caves in Bora-Bora and from Cuba, not far from Guantanamo Bay. Thankfully, we found all of their weapons of mass destruction, safely destroyed them and now our country and mighty Israel are safer. In addition, our soldiers were sent there to end the violence, torture, and murder of Iraqi civilians under Saddam's regime. Since our pre-emptive attack on the sovereign nation of Iraq, our troops have peacefully disarmed the Baath regime without inflicting any terror, or Iraqi civilian death, without destroying their homes, mosques, markets, universities, bridges and power plants and without torture or murders in the US run prisons or on the US patrolled streets. Iraq is finally free.

    #5 We have brought democracy to Iraq and have freed the country so that now citizens can be free to have communication, electric, water, and energy sources privatized to American and other non-Iraqi businesses so that they are in the hands of responsible capitalist corporations like Haliburton, not Iraqis who don't understand freedom and democracy just yet.

    #6 Noah Feldman and Paul Bremer, both true American leaders were the architects for Iraqi's interim constitution and most recent national elections which clearly shows that Iraq is a free nation after being founded by some of the world's most democratic men. It's called LIBERATION!!! and after seeing it happen this past Novemeber in America where every vote counts in this democracy, so it was in free Iraq after the recent elections where every Iraqi vote was counted and every candidate had equal access to the people.

    Finally, our military forces have liberated Iraq (and soon Iran!!!!) from terror and hate using peaceful force, loving weapons, constructing 12 peaceful military bases in Iraq, humanely tortured interrogations and incarcerations and the most peaceful control of once sovereign Iraqi financial and natural resource assets.

    We can only hope for our democracy and freedom that we brought to Iraq to come to Syria and Iran, because like RJ said: some of these chicks are hot! Now that was good planning on the President's part.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 22, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs