One of the best writers I know questioned whether or not I understood the full scope of the Supreme Court ruling on "The Great Land Grab." This has been a busy week, and as news broke all around me I found myself pre-thinking potential editorials. I mentally captured them, made myself a promise to paint each picture, but they had to come at the proper moment for effect. America hears today, contemplates tomorrow, and takes sides at various points along the way. So I'd decided to wait because I knew which side I wanted to say what I wanted to say to, but I had to give them time to get there. Because everybody knows what has just happened, It took less time for disbelief to wash away, and now I can express the "what we're going to do about It"...which is what people are really waiting to hear.
Half of America didn't want the government involved in the Schiavo case, and they must have thought some mean people wanted to watch a brain damaged woman suffer. Christians couldn't fathom a judge ruling to starve a person to death, and now we even know that Terri felt the pains that come with being starved to death...which give new thoughts of anger to those who recall the poor woman bleeding from her nose and ears. The point of opposition was to prevent a judge from legislating from the bench, which is another way of saying "ruling without a basis." America was warned about this dangerous liberal activity then, and now I can say "we told you so"...but I still doubt America will really understand the seriousness of this danger until their land is taken from them.
It starts with a liberal media ( see WAR OF THE MEDIAS) wanting to destroy the president's character in order to prevent his Supreme Court chief justice nomination from passing. Look at the two justices whose names come up when people guess at who the president will name, Scalia, and Thomas. Both of these justices voted nay on the "Land Grab" which was passed 5-4 on the strength of the liberal justices failing to properly read the Constitution. Had the fcve Communists read the 5th Amendment, maybe they'd have understood that what they were allowing already exists in China and that they should move there before betraying America. Now the sane liberals screaming about this travesty understand why we need a place like GITMO, because we're going to relocate the five communist judges . . .and GIT-MO.
Article comments
1 - petrick
I can not find a site that has the past voting decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court Justices. I know who I dislike on the bench, but I also want to find out how they each voted on a case by case basis. Anyone have a suggestion?? Thanks.