Shirkin' for A Livin'

I'm really glad I didn't vote for Obama. I'd be even more disappointed in him than I now am. He's done well with discussing the world's economic issues with the G20 elites (so far) and with those private investors whose "mistakes" converted the largest economy in the world into the world's largest welfare charity. But he's apparently forgotten those whose hopes and votes gave him that opportunity.

I have not been an advocate of the financial rescue of the automakers. The demise of the American auto industry, while a saddening thing, is only the result of the arrogance and hubris of the management. The fault for their bad decision-making cannot be laid at the feet of the workers themselves. But these bad decisions will still cost the workers almost everything while the execs will retain their future economic security, as GM's departed CEO's severance package attests.

I can still hear GM's former CEO Rick Wagoner bragging in 2004 that GM management had heard the clamor over increasing oil prices, but they would continue to build SUVs because that market was where they derived their profits. The CEOs of the other companies all made similar noises at that time. The problem was, each company was attempting to reduce their wage and benefit obligations at the same time, slicing the throat of the very market they pursued with their SUV and big pickup advertising. The infamous trickle-down effect so loudly proclaimed by the Republican Party since the days of the humorously-appropriate Laffer Curve only became evident when the loss of wages and benefits to auto workers spread out into their communities, affecting the employees of parts suppliers and the coffee shop across the street from the plant, and so on.

We have heard a lot of talk about how the nation has gotten into this mess, so I don't need to expound voluminously that. I'm looking at what is being done now, and how it isn't helping the very people who need it most. I shouldn't be too surprised by these events, as this has been the history of this nation since a bunch of wealthy smugglers and swindlers decided that they had enough of the King's long distance frontier justice interfering with their profits. Once they had attained the power to control their own economic destinies, they also had control of those who were not moneyed.

In theory, this wouldn't be so. As Shirley Smith of BuzzFlash quoted from Theodor Herzl's 1902 effort, Altneuland, in a recent post: "The wealth of a country is its working people." In the United States, this wealth has been seriously squandered.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2Page 3Page 4Page 5
Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for realist

Article Author: Realist

You don't have to be Pessimist to become Realist - but it certainly helps!

Visit Realist's author pageRealist's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

— go to most recent comments
  • 1 - Baritone

    Apr 06, 2009 at 12:25 pm

    I believe that your disappointment in Obama is premature. As there are those you cite above who believe that everything is going to hell in a handbasket, there are also those who believe what Obama and his economic arm are doing will, in fact, work.

    I think the jury is still out.

    B

  • 2 - Clavos

    Apr 06, 2009 at 1:29 pm

    The jury (i.e. the American people) is out -- to lunch.

    Permanently.

  • 3 - roger nowosielski

    Apr 06, 2009 at 1:32 pm

    No longer. They're on welfare rolls or unemployment lines.

  • 4 - Aetius Romulous

    Apr 07, 2009 at 10:47 am

    Well, it is a shit show for sure and your article does a great job of chronicling the mess.

    My issue is with the blame.

    We are living through the predictable consequence of a western culture and lifestyle that was always unsustainable. We are at unsustainable now.

    The blame lies with our shared belief that we would always be better off tomorrow than today, that living equitably and sustainably was a weakness to be battled at every instance.

    Nobody was bitching when the price of their homes soared past ridiculous, when they had unlimited credit to spend on mountains of earth choking, non productive consumer crap, or when the price of a shirt in Wal Mart clearly meant horrible slavery somewhere else.

    Screeching at the very folks who made our shallow, plastic lives so wonderful for so many decades, now that they have failed to perform for the first time, reminds us that; to the victors go the "what have you done for me lately" spoils.

    Rather than who did what to whom, when, and why, what we really need is some of that passion redirection towards the future, where we may be able to craft a civilization that really is, finally, better than before.

  • 5 - Ruvy

    Apr 07, 2009 at 12:17 pm

    Let's raise your collective blood pressures a bit more, folks. Apparently Barak Huseein, (blessed of Hussein) Obama is not merely bowing to Saudi thugs (I told you all I would rub your noses in that act of submission to a foreign power). He is also under pressure to sell all of your assets out from under your feet to the Chinese. Maybe the Chinese will be nice enough to toss in some chop suey or egg-drop soup to the soup kitchens. It would be a nice touch - if they are not laced with strichnine....

    The prediction in Isaiah that the wealth of the west would be taken from it seems to be coming true - fast! I'm trying to puzzle out how it will get from China to here. I just got notified that my severance pay is on its way, so I could use some of those - well what the fish currency should I look forward to, anyway?

    Later we have to check for yeast products so that yeast products will neither be eaten nor seen in the house for Passover. I don't know, boys and girls. This is starting to look an awful lot like Redemption on the way....

  • 6 - Dan(Miller)

    Apr 07, 2009 at 1:17 pm

    Aetius Romulous,

    There is a saying in Panama to the effect that Gringos look at life through a three stage filter:

    1. I like it;

    2. So I want it; therefore,

    3. I need it.
    I'm pretty well convinced that this is true. It may be somewhere or other at the root of the "financial crisis" there -- and probably elsewhere too.

    Dan(Miller)

  • 7 - Brian aka Guppusmaximus

    Apr 07, 2009 at 1:30 pm

    Wow... And I thought Panama was just a cool tune by Van Halen.

    They are such a wise people.I guess without us Gringos, Panama would be a better place...*Hmmm*

  • 8 - Dr Dreadful

    Apr 07, 2009 at 1:30 pm

    Dan
    (Mil)
    (ler):

    You forgot (or the Panamanians forgot) Stage Four: I'm entitled to it.

    As in: it's only right that I should have a Hummer which gets such miserable mileage that it needs filling up again before it even gets off the gas station forecourt, a house so large that the phone in the 7th bedroom has a different area code than the one in the garage, a pool big enough to host a regatta in that I never use, and be able to eat out and/or order in for every meal. I mean, it's only right. It's the American Way. Right?

  • 9 - Dan(Miller)

    Apr 07, 2009 at 1:47 pm

    Doc, mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa.

    Dan
    (Mil
    ler)

  • 10 - Clavos

    Apr 07, 2009 at 1:48 pm

    Or as in:

    It's only right that the government should support me because, with fourteen children, there's no way I have enough time to go to work, and besides I'll be damned if I'm gonna let some asshole who thinks he's better than me boss me around.

    But it ain't right that the government can get away with giving me as little as they do; I need more money so I can get me a giant flat screen TV like the rich folks on the hill have; even though they can't use it much because they're at work from sunrise to long after sunset. It's no problem for me, I can watch TV all day, I don't work.

    And it damn sure ain't right that the government can stop me from buying cigarettes and booze with my food stamps...

  • 11 - Dan(Miller)

    Apr 07, 2009 at 1:55 pm

    Clav,

    Oh, Oh. You're asking for it. Better duck*

    Dan(Miller)

    *Quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack quack

  • 12 - Brian aka Guppusmaximus

    Apr 07, 2009 at 1:58 pm

    Aww..I like Ducks.

  • 13 - Brian aka Guppusmaximus

    Apr 07, 2009 at 2:02 pm

    Ya know, I haven't seen too many Hummers anymore. Plus, I think you gotta be a little retarded to buy anything from GM. The last time I checked Toyota was killin 'em all with Prius sales.

  • 14 - Bliffle

    Apr 07, 2009 at 2:15 pm

    Good article.

    Sums up a,lot of the excesses that we are now saddled with, and describes the biggest Bank Robbery in history: The looting of the US treasury by the richest and most powerful people in the world. They can't stop: there is no satisfying Greed.

    They exploit because they can.

  • 15 - A Duck

    Apr 07, 2009 at 2:30 pm

    Aww..I like Ducks.

    Go quack yourself, human!

  • 16 - Cindy

    Apr 07, 2009 at 2:51 pm

    Excellent article. And of course the links are important to look at.

    I'm not sure how anyone can say this form of government/economic structure works. It worked for some people for a very short time--historically.

    Pointing fingers is all well and good, but it's all, every bit of it, part and parcel of the system almost all of you advocate for (claiming nothing else could possible work better than this)

    I hope you come around soon. Or just wait until the whole thing falls down.

  • 17 - Ruvy

    Apr 07, 2009 at 3:03 pm

    the looting of the US treasury by the richest and most powerful people in the world. They can't stop: there is no satisfying Greed. They exploit because they can.

    That, Bliffle, is the perfect explanation of the "evil inclination" hayétzer ha'rá. The rich and powerful steal - they can't stop. They exploit because they can . Carry that concept into personal relationships and you have dealt with just about every problem in human relations that exists.

  • 18 - Dr Dreadful

    Apr 07, 2009 at 3:15 pm

    Clav,

    Are you projecting?

    [quack]

  • 19 - Brian aka Guppusmaximus

    Apr 07, 2009 at 3:16 pm

    Cindy... I do agree to an extent but all I ever see is complaining or finger pointing. I never see any solutions. Ultimately, we do have a choice. To be as uninvolved as possible. Still, I don't know of any other systems that will work any better.

  • 20 - roger nowosielski

    Apr 07, 2009 at 3:52 pm

    Actually, I tend to agree with you Brian. He's got a great command of the facts - in fact, the whole article comes across as a litany or a laundry list of all that's wrong. But we know all that, really. I find the main problem with the article is lack of focus. The Realist seems to be all over the map. I can hardly expect a solution, but a nice summary would be nice. What are the major strains and stresses? All facts and no concepts.

    It's also unclear why the Realist is so glad he didn't vote for Obama. Would McCain do better, or anyone else for that matter? And that's another respect in which the article sort of dangles.

  • 21 - Ruvy

    Apr 07, 2009 at 4:04 pm

    It's also unclear why the Realist is so glad he didn't vote for Obama.

    You need glasses, Roger. The man indicated that his disappointment is far less for not having voted for the bum. It appears irrelevant what he thought of McCain....

  • 22 - Aetius Romulous

    Apr 07, 2009 at 4:07 pm

    Our world will, by necessity, morph into something different - as it always has. That much is certain.

    If we are all very lucky, it will be slow, indeterminable progression from here to there. It may already be under way. The trick will be identifying the change and getting ahead of it.

    The broad strokes should be clear - it will be global, more equitable, and involve a greater reliance on technology, mainly the internet.

    Change will have to start with economics and global financial architecture, with politics signing on or fighting a desperate rear guard action against change. That will be the friction point - will politics follow the necessary and inevitable global economic change, or will it battle to the death with ideology and patriotism?

    I dunno.

  • 23 - roger nowosielski

    Apr 07, 2009 at 4:18 pm

    Ruvy,

    Your argument doesn't wash; these aren't good enough reasons since the situation may well be insolvable. Your own vitriol stops you from thinking clearly.

  • 24 - roger nowosielski

    Apr 07, 2009 at 4:20 pm

    The change is sure coming, Aeatius. Imperial presidency and imperial government - a preamble to the NWO. So don't raise your hopes too high. Enjoy while you can.

  • 25 - Ruvy

    Apr 07, 2009 at 4:35 pm

    I'm really glad I didn't vote for Obama. I'd be even more disappointed in him than I now am

    Roger, that is how Realist begins this article. I quote his reason. From having read many of his articles, I tend to doubt that he would have voted for McCain, but that is not relevant here.

    My arguments, Roger? I'm not making any arguments: I'm quoting you the words of the author.

    It is rather simple.... There is no vitriol, anger or anything else here. It's called a quote to authority - the authority being the words of the author.

    barúr l'khá? hevánta otí?

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 27, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs