SCHIP: What They Aren't Telling You - Comments Page 2

There is an obvious political agenda surrounding the SCHIP expansion, and it is a game politicians on both sides have been playing for years.

As expected, President Bush vetoed the children's health insurance bill today. Also as expected, this has brought an onslaught of attacks from the left, coupled with blatant lies to back them up. Senator Harry Reid, who is quickly moving my top ten list of useless politicians, called it a "heartless veto."…
Read comments below, or read this article from the beginning.

Article comments

  • 26 - Cindy D

    Oct 05, 2007 at 3:20 am

    "...they likely will not be able to afford their health care when they succeed in making themselves sick, so society (I.e., the government) will have to take care of them.

    More likely, they'll end up paying the cigarette taxes and then not be able to afford their medication.

  • 27 - Cindy D

    Oct 05, 2007 at 3:21 am

    so, no, the government won't "take care" of them.

  • 28 - bliffle

    Oct 05, 2007 at 7:43 am

    "It's not heartless, Bliffle, it's just part of the way the system works."

    The way the system works!

    Ahhhh, so if Joe Blow, driven into bankruptcy by medical bills for his children and desperate, bops you on the head in a dark Austin street, takes your cash and steals your car, that's just part of the way the system works?

    Because surely the system, or perhaps the meta-system, worked that way.

    And if I said so I wouldn't be heartless?

  • 29 - handyguy

    Oct 05, 2007 at 11:37 am

    The cigarette-tax provision is, pardon the expression, just smoke and mirrors.

    The Pay As You Go rules in Congress require that every bill pay for itself - except, apparently, Pentagon spending. The cigarette tax increase will probably never actually become law - look how enormous it is, a 300% increase or something.

    So the bill will probably end up adding to the deficit. But to some of us, if there has to be deficit spending, better to use it on good social programs than rotten foreign policy.

  • 30 - Cindy D

    Oct 05, 2007 at 11:56 am

    Cigarettes have already been taxed into absurdity. I predict a new market in home-grown tobacco, complete with new laws to determine "personal use" quantities versus quantities that suggest an intent to sell.

  • 31 - Clavos

    Oct 05, 2007 at 12:33 pm

    There already is a thriving black market in the southeastern states for cigarettes from North Carolina and Virginia, which, for obvious reasons are much less taxed than cigarettes sold elsewhere.

    I can remember buying bootleg NC cigarettes here in Florida all the way back in the 60s.

  • 32 - bliffle

    Oct 05, 2007 at 12:54 pm

    "SCHIP: What They Aren't Telling You"

    What 'they' aren't telling you is that this is a red herring to make a fuss while 'they' allocate hundreds of billions more to the Iraq invasion and to prepare to invade Iran.

    One can imagine the scene in the Neocon War Room in DC:

    "we need something to distract the (gullible) US public from the next couple hundred billion$ of invasion money" says Cheney. "get me Karl Rove on the phone!"

    "That's easy, just make a big noise about something that everyone has an opinion on, that'll keep the peasants preoccupied" says Karl. "It's a simple matter of bread and circuses".

    So they send down orders to the ink-stained wretches at their various newspapers, etc. Even to the petty neocons on blogs, tiny little outfits like BC.

    One can almost hear Nalle enthusiastically acquiescing with "HUA!". Or was that "heil"?

  • 33 - Dave Nalle

    Oct 05, 2007 at 2:59 pm

    It's a lovely paranoid fantasy, Bliffle, but it bears no resemblance to the real world.

    No one sent me a memo, and as far as I can tell this SCHIP problem originated with Democrats in Congress. If they'd just extended it with minor improvements no one would ever have made an issue of it.

    Dave

  • 34 - Baritone

    Oct 05, 2007 at 4:20 pm

    Had the Dems simply ammended SCHIPS as you suggest, Dave, it would have continued to leave millions of children without any adequate access to healthcare. To suggest that it was simply a political move on the part of the Dems, I would suggest that ALL the moves by ALL the Dems and Reps are political. These people are first and foremost politicians for crap sakes! What do you expect?

    B-tone

  • 35 - handyguy

    Oct 05, 2007 at 5:28 pm

    It's not just Democrats supporting this bill. There are enough votes in the Senate to override the veto, and only 20 votes too few in the House. Republican Charles Grassley, not a liberal, seems passionate on the issue [and on trying to override]. This is not a simple left-right issue, although extremists on both sides have been quick to take up predictable positions.

  • 36 - Cindy D

    Oct 05, 2007 at 8:41 pm

    The majority of Americans want the SCHIP increase.

    Washington Post/ABC News Poll Oct. 2

  • 37 - bliffle

    Oct 05, 2007 at 9:00 pm

    Dave sez: "...No one sent me a memo,.."

    I know, I know, it's a knee-jerk reaction by now. You're so good you can anticipate the next command without having to actually hear Your Masters Voice.

    In ElectroMagnetic wave propagation theory one learns that a Group signal can travel faster than the speed of light (seemingly in contradiction to Einstein, seemingly). This must be the way Nalle detects these wishes of the Masters And Gurus in DC.

  • 38 - REMF

    Oct 05, 2007 at 9:21 pm

    "It's a lovely paranoid fantasy, Bliffle, but it bears no resemblance to the real world."

    Always nice to be called "paranoid" and lectured on the "real world" by a guy who lives in a fortified compound, ehe bliff?

  • 39 - Jerry

    Oct 08, 2007 at 1:43 pm

    Bliffle -

    What if Dave, who's known to own firearms, has a concealed weapon in that dark alley, and blows Mr. Blow away, isn't that also how "the system works"?

  • 40 - bliffle

    Oct 21, 2007 at 9:13 am

    Now that SCHIP has served it's purpose as a red herring to distract attention from Iraq Invasion funding all those neocons who feigned interest in controlling deficits and/or healthcare for children have dropped out of the conversation. Thus proving my assertion that it was a distraction all along.


  • 41 - bliffle

    Oct 23, 2007 at 12:54 pm

    With budget fatigue set fully in place Bush has demanded of congress another $44billion in Vanity War funding, thus dwarfing, again, the few pennies that might have been spent on childrens health.

    Clearly, the SCHIPs furor was instigated to dull your senses to the upcoming finanncial onslaught by Bush.

    Nalle, Clavos, etc., beat the drums and sounded the horns about the sheer madness of spending money on mere children. After all, that money could be better employed paying off his backers and supporters.

    Sleep on, o sheep of America.

  • 42 - gonzo marx

    Oct 23, 2007 at 1:09 pm

    bah....all the so-called Democratic "strategists" should be forced to drink bleach for their own incompetence

    S-CHIP is a perfect example

    all you need to do to fuck with the WH and make the majority of Americans go "yaaaay!" is to place ALL the War funding, as well as S-CHIP into the overall budget

    this stops the WH from bullshit Enron style accounting when they try and claim they are being fiscally responsible...

    AND if W slaps a veto on it, the Dems can then ask, VERY publicly , WHY he doesn't support the troops and why he hates America's children so much he doesn't want them to get health care

    so fucking simple, yet they remain so fucking clueless

    so...any of you Elected Representatives want a strategist who can show you how to actually WIN a political battle...yer gonzo suggest not only Machiavelli, but the Art of War as well

    nuff said...

    Excelsior?

  • 43 - Charles Signorile

    Oct 23, 2007 at 2:25 pm

    what Democrats fail to realize in regards to the SCHIP debate is that Bush was not saying we cannot afford $35 billion over 5 years. Funding for the war will end shortly, wether it be 1 year of 5 years or 10 years, it will not be a cost passed on to our children. An expanded entitlement program however will only continue to grow, and as we have seen with the failed social security system, once the government starts a program to "take care of people" it is impossible to dissolve.

  • 44 - gonzo marx

    Oct 23, 2007 at 2:30 pm

    Charles sez - "Funding for the war will end shortly, wether it be 1 year of 5 years or 10 years, it will not be a cost passed on to our children."

    no offense intended, but bullshit!

    Iraq is off budget, and deficit spending..it's already on the nation's credit card for well over half a trillion dollars...our kids and grandkids are already the ones paying for it

    at least they could be healthy enough to work in order to pay for it all

    as for the 1, 5, or 10 year bit...you do know that the mercenary contractors have NO defined endpoint in their agreements?

    those folks are there, on our nickel, for eternity, according to their contracts...and check those prices!!

    gotta take it all into consideration, and ya can't palm that ace when folks are watching...

    Excelsior?

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 22, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs