The Saudis appear to be taking concerted steps to capture Islamist terrorists at home and to change the tone of religious rhetoric abroad. Is this cosmetic or fundamental change?
- The Saudi authorities say security forces have shot dead a suspected Islamist militant in a gun battle at a petrol station in the capital, Riyadh. The interior ministry said Ibrahim al-Rayes was listed among 26 most wanted terror suspects last week.
Security services said they attempted to arrest him after residents provided information as to his whereabouts.
The authorities had offered a reward of more than $1m for the capture of any of the 26 suspects on the list.
....Saudi Arabia has witnessed a surge of Islamist militant violence believed to be linked to al-Qaeda. More than 50 people have been killed by suicide bombings in May and November.
In a police raid on a suspected militant hideout last month in Suweidi, south of the capital Riyadh, one militant was shot dead while an unspecified number escaped.
Both the US and British embassies in Saudi Arabia have recently warned of more terrorist attacks. [BBC]
Of course even the Saudis don't much like it when their own people are blown up by terrorists so this could be seen as primarily a criminal matter.
But this change does seem significant to me:
- U.S. authorities have revoked the diplomatic visa of an influential Islamic cleric, and the Saudi government has decided it will no longer sponsor an Islamic institute in Virginia where he sometimes lectured, moves that reflect both nations' increasing efforts to curb the spread of extremist Islamic rhetoric, according to U.S. and Saudi officials.
Jaafar Idris, who was affiliated with the Fairfax-based Institute for Islamic and Arabic Sciences in America, left the United States two weeks ago after his visa was revoked, U.S. officials said. Idris is a native of Sudan, but was sponsored as a diplomat here by the Saudi embassy and had an office in that embassy's Islamic affairs section, according to a lawyer associated with him.
Idris's departure follows a decision by the Saudi government to stop providing diplomatic status to Islamic clerics and educators teaching overseas, according to a senior Saudi official who declined to be identified. The official said that in the future, only staff with legitimate diplomatic business at Saudi embassies around the world will be given diplomatic visas, part of a larger effort to get Saudi embassies out of the business of promoting religion.
Article comments
1 - jadester
if the end result is the same, in this case, i would argue it doesn't matter a great deal. If they have to be politically pressured into taking such action, but do end up taking such action, whilst it would be a shame they only feel the need to do it due to pressure, it's better than if they ignored such pressure
2 - Eric Olsen
I would agree that the action is what is most important, but the underlyng intent is probably the best indication of future action and whether the steps being taken are to achieve actual change or just provide the illusion of change.