Satire: Chevron's Waterbelly Faints Under Scrutiny, Grodomier Steps In - Page 2

Author: MarlowePublished: May 06, 2006 at 1:36 pm 3 comments

“And, we keep hearing how companies, such as Chevron are ‘beholden’ to the ‘stockholder’. But when you have a CEO that – alone - holds somewhere around 500,000 shares isn’t he the most important ‘shareholder’?”

Before Waterbelly could pry apart his now ferociously parched lips, another reporter asked:

“So, what you’re no doubt going to say is that somehow, this David J. O’Reilly, Chevron’s CEO, somehow, in some mysterious way, works so hard that he deserves to be paid over 400 times more than Chevron’s station managers, the men and women that daily captain Chevron’s fleet of retail stores, where, let’s face it, Chevron made that stunning 49% profit increase this last quarter? That somehow he works so hard he deserves to be paid an hourly wage of $6,971 while his average worker at these stores makes $8 per hour at best?”

At this point, Waterbelly fainted. He was replaced immediately by Chevron’s new spokesman, Marvin A. Grodomier, who ignored these questions and began reading from a prepared statement: “Chevron owes its shareholders…”

Page 1 — Page 2
Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for marlowe

Article Author: Marlowe

"You have a somewhat peculiar sense of humor,” he said.
"Not peculiar," I said. "Just uninhibited."

Visit Marlowe's author pageMarlowe's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • Pigs at the Trough: How Corporate Greed and Political Corruption Are Undermining America Pigs at the Trough: How Corporate Greed and Political Corruption Are...

    Who filled the trough? Who set the table at the banquet of greed? How has it been possible for corporate pigs to gorge themselves on grossly inflated pay packages and heaping helpings of stock options ...

Article comments

  • 1 - marlowesbeef

    May 06, 2006 at 9:13 pm

    The sad truth is - the above is mostly true. Chevron posts $4 billion in profit yet CUTS manager's bonus across the U.S.

    P. Marlowe

  • 2 - Victor Plenty

    May 06, 2006 at 9:19 pm

    FLASH UPDATE (from a leaked memo):

    We hoped to cut bonuses entirely from our management packages (except those mission-critical executive bonuses, of course).

    Then we realized if we had no bonuses to slash, that would leave us with no way to randomly penalize station managers who fail to meet vaguely defined performance targets. Without that, we'd be hard pressed to maintain our corporate culture of fear. Plus, how else can we reward weasels for coming up with minor technicalities and ratting out the few surviving decent human beings in our workforce?

    Station manager bonuses are such a flexible source of random penalties and rewards, we couldn't just get rid of them. Corporate HQ is really happy with the present cuts, however, as we think the money we've saved by screwing over our station managers will neatly cover the cost of another executive retreat and team-building exercise in Tahiti this year.

  • 3 - marlowesbeef

    May 06, 2006 at 10:50 pm

    Ah... A fellow travler! Wait! What's that you're reading?! The READER'S DIGEST?

    P. Marlowe

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 25, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs