But, the politicians have used this pretense since the Great Depression to step in and “rescue” our economy from the “greedy capitalists.” After the stock market crash of October 1929, the Federal Reserve pumped $300 million into the reserves of the nation’s banks. It expanded its balance sheet by purchasing $1 billion of government securities and provided $200 million more to banks at discounted rates. Sound familiar? These numbers are nothing compared to what the Fed and treasury have spent on the current crisis ($12 trillion), but they were a lot, given the nation’s GDP at the time was $100 billion. The scary thought is that by the time Hoover left office, his attempt to re-inflate the bubble produced a 25 percent unemployment rate. What will $12 trillion produce?
Additionally, government works projects were used by Hoover/Roosevelt and are about to be used by Obama. Hoover raised taxes on the rich and Obama has threatened to do the same by allowing Bush’s tax cuts to expire. Fortunately, a major policy difference between then and now is that Washington has not passed protectionist measures in the current crisis, though it came close with “buy America” clauses in the stimulus bill. Nonetheless, the comparisons in policy are startling, given they didn’t work the first time.
Beyond the policy similarities, there are at least two chilling coincidences between then and now. In 1931, almost two years after the crash, the unemployment rate was only 9 percent. One and a half years after the current crisis began unemployment is 8.9 percent. But, more ominously, given Hoover’s inflating of the money supply banks didn’t lend, and consumers were not spending, in 1932. Naturally, the short term deflation that resulted improved the economy for a while, because it began to deflate the credit bubble, which the economy needed to recover. However, it was only a matter of time before all the new money hit the economy and caused havoc. One year later, the unemployment rate soared to 25 percent.








Article comments
1 - Irene Wagner
Bush/Obama? Why the Slash, Kenn?
Few comments here, because you're making it sound too much like Bush and Obama might just have some blame to share.
Too bad so many financial bottom dwellers who are being worked over are throwing blame at one another, instead of focusing it where it belongs.
2 - Dave Nalle
Should they be blaming Murray Rothbard and the culture of selfishness and elitism which he advocated?
Dave
3 - Irene Wagner
It's not so much that they're blaming Murray Rothbard, Dave. They're ignoring him...or never getting around to reading him becase there's DEMOCRATS to be agin' or REPUBLICANS to be agin'.
(Kenn, I should be careful with sarcasm. I actually enjoy your articles and hated to see the 0 in the comments counter. So I had to open my big mouth.)