Rankist Generosity

As the aftermath of the tsunami continues to play out, Stalin's famous quote about a million deaths being a statistic while a single death is a tragedy couldn't be more true. The over-riding sentiment that seems to be attached to most stories is the rankist element that is part of any comment on individual or government sponsored contributions to the relief effort. There are also the accompanying desperate efforts to conjure up language that will express the feelings of shared grief but they just seem to...fall a bit flat.

What is tangible are the insinuations and outright scolding heaped on various nations and entertainment and sports superstars who haven't ponied up what is perceived to be an adequate amount. Those assertions crackle, are real, are something we can really associate with.

The one-upsmanship from various governments around the world can't help but be beneficial as the real amount of aid continues to increase. A closer look reveals that many strings are attached to various pledges. These dazzling promises and high figures may in part be based on low-interest loans and might well not materialize in full.

Donations made by various stars and duly advertised may also have ulterior motives, including an enhanced public image. Again, if the end result is more assistance, then it's great to see every overpaid thespian and steroid bloated pro athlete run scurrying to make a donation prior to their next interview so they can let the true figure roll off their tongue in a nonchalant way and appear genuinely moved.

Woe is the fool like Paradorn Srichiphan, a wealthy Thai tennis star, who made such a pathetically sniveling donation (10, 000 baht , about 250 US dollars) in comparison to his earnings, that he will most certainly pay for it in a real monetary way. The 10, 000 dollars US he could have easily given will be eclipsed by the income loss he is sure to suffer as a result of this huge PR disaster.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Eric Olsen

    Jan 13, 2005 at 9:23 am

    other than the intemperate lauding of the Guardian and the equivocation of Iraq (a war) and the tsunami disaster (an apolitical act of nature) at the end, super and perceptive job of analyzing the sociology of the post-disaster mentality and the exigencies of expectation - thanks Finkleman!

  • 2 - Dave Nalle

    Jan 13, 2005 at 9:36 am

    LOL. You said something nice about The Guardian. So much for any credibility you had..

    As for the whining about who is giving what for disaster relief, how about the monumental ingratitude of the Indonesians who are insisting that US soldiers there to help out their citizens and deliver aid not carry weapons when going into rebel-infested territories like Ache, and force their women to wear head scarves while handing out food. What kind of government makes head scarves a priority over the welfare of its disaster-stricken people?

    Dave

  • 3 - Eric Olsen

    Jan 13, 2005 at 9:46 am

    I think there are plenty of nice things that can be reasonably said about the Guardian, but naming it the top online paper certainly reveals a certain predisposition

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 22, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs