Obama Gets It Wrong About Cops and Race

Is it possible Barack Obama is using the whole Gates “stupid” remark to take some heat off his floundering health care ambitions? Or is this simply a “teachable moment?”

My suspicions were further aroused when he came out, at a specific time on a Friday afternoon at a White House press briefing, to discuss the matter. Neil Cavuto thinks the “stupid” remark is helping to derail health care, but could it be the other way around? The media and punditry discussion over the “stupid” remark is taking health care reform off the front page. Is that good or bad? If we were dealing with the Clinton Administration, I would think my theory is correct. That said:

Barack Obama managed to get it all wrong when it comes to cops and race. There are good cops and bad cops. The problem is Barack Obama appears to view the world through a black and white lens instead of eyes wide open.

For about a five year period I had a stalker. At least once a month, this guy would stand outside my bedroom windows and smoke. There was no more welcome sight than the flashing blue light of the local sheriff’s deputy as he would pull into the yard and try (once again) to figure out who this person was.

In cases like this cops have the habit of not taking the victim seriously, instead, basically accusing the victim, almost always a woman, of being a little bit “off”. This never happened to me. I kept a record of everything, to the point that our local sheriff actually made an appointment and came out to visit, discussing my options. Never once was I treated without total and complete respect.

It may have helped that at the time I was the owner of a very popular local gallery. My connections to the community went back nearly forty years. I was also the chairman of our local county GOP executive committee. I would like to think status had nothing to do with the excellent protection I received.

Oh, the option that worked? I moved clear across the country.

I left South Carolina with an excellent feeling about law enforcement. Cops were good, helpful individuals who had the best interests of the community at heart. This view of law enforcement was further enhanced by the local police department where I now live. They are the second-highest paid cops in New Mexico, which has something to do with the quality of law enforcement we have locally.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2Page 3Page 4
Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for sj-reidhead

Article Author: SJ Reidhead

SJ Reidhead is the author of two western novels, and several books about Tombstone and Wyatt Earp. She blogs at The Pink Flamingo. While she is highly critical of the influence of far right conservatives on her beloved Republican Party, her first …

Visit SJ Reidhead's author pageSJ Reidhead's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

— go to most recent comments
  • 1 - pablo

    Jul 25, 2009 at 4:33 pm

    yawn

  • 2 - Arch Conservative

    Jul 26, 2009 at 3:21 am

    Cops are a microcosm of society in general, some good, some bad.

    Obama, by assuming that the cop was a racist without knowing any of the facts, proves that he's no better than that fat race baiting pig Al Sharpton.

  • 3 - Joanne Huspek

    Jul 26, 2009 at 7:46 am

    The one sentence that makes the most sense is the our President is out of touch with reality. He's not alone; the entire Congress and most state governments are in that same boat.

    You're right. Not all cops are good cops and not all are racists. That said, not all college professors exhibit common sense and some play the name game as well as the race card.

    The President should not have inserted himself when he did when he didn't have all the facts (admittedly). But since "press conferences" are orchestrated, I have to think he knew the question was coming and had an answer waiting.

  • 4 - Bliffle

    Jul 26, 2009 at 4:47 pm

    Zzzzzzzzzzzz.

  • 5 - Robert M. Barga

    Jul 27, 2009 at 6:33 am

    While I must say that this sucks for you, I would simply have sued and won a crapton of money.
    You acted exactly how you should have, and you did it all properly
    That said, this "black scholar" was obviously in the wrong and should not have acted the way he did.

  • 6 - Silas Kain

    Jul 27, 2009 at 9:48 am

    So Barack made a mistake in his commentary. The stark reality is that Black men in America deal with these things on a daily basis and THAT is the ultimate issue. Perhaps the professor was over the top. Perhaps the Cambridge police responded a bit too aggressively. As one who travels through Cambridge on a daily basis, I find Cambridge police to be more in tune with "serve and protect" than say, Boston cops. To me the Boston police union is more like an organized crime family designed to serve and protect their own and screw the ones who pay their salaries. But I digress...

    We may have an African American President but we haven't evolved enough to the point where Black males can feel comfortable walking down the street. That's reality, folks. Perhaps after the professor and the cop have a beer with the Prez, we can move on and have a frank discussion about race and profiling in this country. Let's see if we can fit that into the national dialog between health care, the economy, the wars on two fronts and, of course, world peace.

  • 7 - Robert M. Barga

    Jul 27, 2009 at 10:07 am

    Maybe, just maybe, it is the black males fault for this
    As Jessie Jackson himself said "if i am walking down the street at night and see a black male on my side, I will cross to the other"

  • 8 - Silas Kain

    Jul 27, 2009 at 10:11 am

    Oh please. I'd rather walk down the streets of Dorchester, Massachusetts amidst hundreds of Black males than walk in the streets of Provo Utah where Mormons are Mormons and sheep are frightened.

  • 9 - Dr Dreadful

    Jul 27, 2009 at 10:16 am

    What makes me feel that Obama overreacted with regard to this particular case is the photo that most prominently accompanied the story when it broke, showing Gates in handcuffs and in the foreground, a black police sergeant.

    That said, I think Silas pretty much hits the nail full on here; and Robert made a good point too. I suspect that even black officers are more likely to stop and search an African-American than a Caucasian. The meme (sorry, Clav) that black men are more likely to be criminally active is very hard to shake.

  • 10 - Nails

    Jul 27, 2009 at 10:24 am

    "S okay, Doc, this once :>)

    But, is it a meme?

    Or, is it reality?

    And I would venture that Jesse Jackson said what he did because statistically, as a black man he's far more at risk on a dark street at night when another black man approaches than a white man would be.

  • 11 - Dr Dreadful

    Jul 27, 2009 at 10:52 am

    Clav, I agree that there's more at work here than just prejudice.

    But there's also the fact that I've never been pulled over by a cop whereas my former co-worker, an African-American whose Dad is a criminology professor at the local university, gets stopped quite regularly for the offense (which I have a feeling may not be on the statute books) of being a black man driving a BMW.

  • 12 - Clavos

    Jul 27, 2009 at 11:12 am

    Doc,

    Yeah, I'm sure that's true.

    Here we have a concept called DWB, Driving While Black, and it's unfortunate when it happens to an innocent person, but if all that happens is a stop, and then the individual is allowed to proceed, without harassment, there's no real harm done.

    I would guess that if the crime statistics were highest for say, indigenous Mexicans, it would be they who would be stopped while driving beemers.

    That it's largely not a product of racism, I think, is evidenced by the fact that Black cops practice it as well.

  • 13 - Ricardovitz

    Jul 27, 2009 at 12:35 pm

    I'm real tired of hearin 'bout what Black folks think Whitey been wronging them about.

    We all know that this here Gates feller ain't nobody. Harvard done gave him a job and gave him a house and gave him a class to teach so they can claim that their College is "Racially Diverse". Somehow, these idiots think being "racially diverse" makes their school more enlightened, progressive, and down right full of geniuses.

    But, I'm here to tell you that it ain't. Harvard is full of idiots. And, King Idiot is that fella Gates. He's a whitey-hating racist black man, yessiree, boys and girls.

    I reckon that Harvard needs racist-whitey hating black men spoutin all sorts of nonsense to yer kids, so them idiots can smoke there dope and dream about how enlighted and smarty-smart they are.

    Welcome to Harvard Community College, where any black man can teach any old crap, and any dumb idiot can get a full scolarship if he's black and can prove that he was a product of inner city gangs.

    Any fool who sends there white kid to Harvard, is one dern stupid fool.

  • 14 - Robert M. Barga

    Jul 27, 2009 at 3:36 pm

    Jackson actually said it when talking about stereotypes, and explained that the way to combat them is to stop the reason that they are happening. Thus, he explained that young black men need to stop comiting so many crimes

  • 15 - Silas Kain

    Jul 27, 2009 at 6:38 pm

    I reckon that Harvard needs racist-whitey hating black men spoutin all sorts of nonsense to yer kids, so them idiots can smoke there dope and dream about how enlighted and smarty-smart they are.

    Dear God, spoken like an Arkansan redneck. I agree Harvard is populated with idiots but Professor Gates is not one of them. Could he be an angry Black man? Sure. Does he have reason to carry such anger? Absolutely.

    The stark reality is that Black men still suffer some kind of stigma. While one would think after all these years it would go away, the truth is that it does not. Racism may not be expressed on the streets -- but it is expressed in the confines of the home.

    Times have changed. We're at the dawn of a new era in the United States where white males will no longer maintain majority status. It's a bitch, crackers, deal with it.

    If Nelson Mandela can rise above his own oppression and forge ahead to make his own native land racially diverse, who are we not to imitate his example? Our Christian forefathers did not intend to include "negroes" as "free men" in our Constitution. But they left behind a living document that could adapt to a changing world.

    This piece of paper is our sacred bond as a common people. I don't take it lightly. It is intended to be the hallmark in our society, governed by the rule of law. Not by God. Not by the Torah. Not by the New Testament. Not by the Koran. And, certainly, not by the Book of Mormon. All these books have their place in society within the confines of organized religion. No verse from any of these books, whether quoted or incorporated by reference, have a place in our Constitution.

    We may not be able to enforce tolerance across our society. That being said, I would hope that we could at least seed the next generation with the notion that it is possible to coexist in a peaceful society.

    If anything, I look at Justice-designate Sotomayor as being in the unique position to cross all barriers when rendering her decisions from the bench. Those decisions could finally resonate across all divides because, you know what? She was right. The perspective of a Latina woman is different from that of say, Justice Scalia. While Justice may be blind, it must never be blind to compassion and empathy. I hope I live long enough to see the day come when she succeeds John Roberts as the Chief Justice.

  • 16 - Ruvy

    Jul 28, 2009 at 2:55 am

    Obama has definitely gotten it wrong on race - but folks in Jerusalem have Obama's number and can tell you why he gets it wrong. He is a racist. Nice to see my fellow Israelis finally waking up and calling a spade a spade (pun intended).

  • 17 - Jordan Richardson

    Jul 28, 2009 at 4:32 am

    Yeah, Ruvy, sounds like a very intelligent group of "folks" there in Jerusalem at those rallies. I especially love the "Let My People Grow" placards.

  • 18 - Ruvy

    Jul 28, 2009 at 11:44 am

    sounds like a very intelligent group of "folks" there in Jerusalem at those rallies....

    That's okay, Jordan. They do not have to answer to what you think is intelligent or not. They, like me, answer to G-d. I'm sure they would think highly of your intelligence too, Jordan - NOT!

  • 19 - Robert M. Barga

    Jul 28, 2009 at 1:09 pm

    um, Ruvy, just a side point, that was very childish

    that said, I agree that Obama is not helping the Jews out as he implied he would, but i dont see why he needs to

  • 20 - Ruvy

    Jul 28, 2009 at 1:21 pm

    Actually, Robert, Obama is the best thing for us to happen in years. He ripped the mask of "friendship" from the United States government, and now Israelis can just what Jew-haters and self-hating Jews run America.

    The enemy is clear now - and he who bows to him will find himself a target.

  • 21 - Robert M. Barga

    Jul 28, 2009 at 1:25 pm

    Just because we do not support people doesn't mean that we hate them

  • 22 - Ruvy

    Jul 28, 2009 at 3:13 pm

    I'm not talking about you or your opinions, Robert. I'm talking about your government and its actions. Maybe you should put that pipe down and let the smoke clear a bit there so you can actually see what I'm writing, chum. Last I recall, you do not make American policy....

    If you've been promoted in the Obamacracy of the Obamanation, and you do, my congrats - sorta.

  • 23 - Robert M. Barga

    Jul 28, 2009 at 5:19 pm

    My question to you is why should my government help your government

  • 24 - Jordan Richardson

    Jul 28, 2009 at 5:42 pm

    Robert, Ruvy talks incessantly around here about how he doesn't want "your government's" help but then he whines when he doesn't get a president to reflect a foreign policy that is akin to a blow job.

    Between that and telling Americans they're all going to die from swine flu/Obama/the economy/drugs/gangster rap, Ruvy's pretty solid.

    Plus, he tried a "not" joke. So....yeah.

    Ruvy, if the protesters answer to a higher power, that's super. But you're bringing them up in this discussion, so their credibility regarding Obama's "racism" is certainly relevant on a level far beyond (or below) a deistic one.

  • 25 - roger nowosielski

    Jul 28, 2009 at 6:06 pm

    Just like the makers of the Hebrew Nationals, Jordan. They do answer to a higher authority.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Feb 09, 2010

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for January

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs

Upcoming Stories from Blogcritics
  •