No, Really, This Time I Mean It

Author: loidPublished: Nov 18, 2004 at 8:23 am 6 comments

What are you supposed to do after reading something like this? Laugh? Cry? Puke? It would be funny parody coming from the likes of The Onion. Unfortunately, it's a serious news story in today's Washington Post.

Colin Powell, the lone voice of semi-reason amongst the cracked pots in Bush's cabinet, the guy the president is dumping because his correct advice was to zig when the neoconservatives really wanted to zag, the secretary of state whose disdain for the flawed Weapons of Mass Destruction intelligence that got the U.S. into the Iraq mess was leaked publicly - but who, under orders, then humiliated himself anyway by trying to sell the bag of shit to the United Nations, who knew as well as Powell did that it was a big lie -

That Colin Powell, the one being replaced by Condo "yessir, Mr. B." Rice - now is singing the Weapons of Mass Destruction song again, with Iran in the chorus this time. Here's the first couple of verses:

"I have seen some information that would suggest that they have been actively working on delivery systems. . . . You don't have a weapon until you put it in something that can deliver a weapon," Powell told reporters traveling with him to Chile for an Asia-Pacific economic summit. "I'm not talking about uranium or fissile material or the warhead; I'm talking about what one does with a warhead." ...

"I'm talking about information that says they not only have these missiles, but I am aware of information that suggests that they were working hard as to how to put the two together," Powell said, referring to the process of matching warheads to missiles. ...

"There is no doubt in my mind — and it's fairly straightforward from what we've been saying for years — that they have been interested in a nuclear weapon that has utility, meaning that it is something they would be able to deliver, not just something that sits there." ...

Powell said the United States would monitor verification efforts "with necessary and deserved caution because for 20 years the Iranians have been trying to hide things from the international community."

Holy shit, sports fans! What does this really mean? Among the many and unnatractive possiblities:

1. Powell is speaking the truth as it has recently been revealed to him, perhaps because he's alarmed that the International Atomic Energy Agency just opined that all nuclear material in Iran has been accounted for and does not appear to be in use in a weapons program, and the heads of European states just received non-proliferation promises from Iran. But Powell has evidence it's all a WMD smokescreen.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • America Alone: The Neo-Conservatives and the Global Order America Alone: The Neo-Conservatives and the Global Order

    This book explores how George W. Bush's election, and the fear and confusion of September 11th combined to allow a small group of radical intellectuals to seize the reins of US national security policy. ...

Article comments

  • 1 - Mark Saleski

    Nov 18, 2004 at 10:29 am

    i like the photo in the current onion that shows bush next to gonzalez with the caption "Ashcroft Loses Job To Mexican".

    ...and those guys get paid to write that stuff. it ain't fair.

  • 2 - Jim Carruthers

    Nov 18, 2004 at 7:30 pm

    Not to forget that Colin is now free to march down the street, haul Michael out from his desk at the FCC, drag him outside, bend him over his knee, and just wail the hell out of him.

    What (whack) part (whack) of the motherfucking (whack) constitution, do you not (whack) understand? I raised you (whack) better than (whack) that boy!

  • 3 - RJ

    Nov 19, 2004 at 8:20 pm

    "Condo "yessir, Mr. B." Rice"

    That is borderline racist.

  • 4 - Jim Carruthers

    Nov 19, 2004 at 8:41 pm

    Could one of you please explain to me how this runny brown stream of what passes for wit in your neck of the woods is supposed to inspire me to admire or even pay attention to what you have say?

    Frankly, I'm baffled, because it seems like nothing more than the behavior of somebody pissing on the sidewalk, yelling, "what are you looking at?" when you are asked to not piss on the sidewalk.

    You only seem to be committed to making things worse, and that's not so appealing. Mostly just to be avoided like toxic waste.

    Of course, as examples of members of the USA as belligerent, abusive ignorant thugs, this is just prime.

  • 5 - loid

    Nov 20, 2004 at 9:36 am

    RJ, "yessir, Mr. B" isn't borderline anything. It represents someone who kisses up to her boss, telling him just what he wants to hear because, obviously, that's how you get ahead in the Bush administration. Are you suggesting blacks as a demographic group say "yessir?" a lot and therefore using the phrase in a post is racist? Good lord.

    Jim, I could care less whether this "runny brown stream" results in admiration or attention from you. At the time this was written, no one outside the Post had reported on, let alone commented on, the remarkable statements Powell made about Iran and the ramifications from same. My post is pointing out what I believe are the motives behind the statements. Applying critical thinking to the actions and words of political leaders is not "making things worse." Making things worse is just blindly accepting everything they say and do as being true or altruistic. That's one of the main reasons 1,200-plus American kids have died in Iraq so far with more on the way, by far the worst budget deficits in American history and no end in sight to either the deaths or the wasted dollars. No one (at least no one in Congress) had the guts to speak up.

    But that's just my opinion. People in the blogosphere create commentary and opinion on a regular basis, and read and accept or reject other people's commentaries and opinions. That's all it amounts to. If you don't like my writing style or opinions, reject them. I can take it.

    But if you don't understand the post, how do you explain your earlier comment? Kinda Jeckle & Hyde.

  • 6 - RJ

    Nov 20, 2004 at 11:36 pm

    I think JC meant that comment to be sent to another post...

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 29, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs