News Flash: Arlen Specter Switches Party

Part of: NewsFlash

In a stunning (though not completely unexpected) move, Pennsylvania Senator Arlen Specter has switched parties. The 79-year old former Republican had been courted before. And had even flirted with the idea of becoming an Independent (sort of the Republicans’ Joe Lieberman). But as late as March Spector told reporters that he had intended to run in the 2010 Pennsylvania Senatorial primary as a Republican. The senator, who would be considered a moderate among Republicans has been at odds frequently with his party as it has been drawn further and further to the right.

 A liberal on such issues as abortion and the environment, he had been under increasing fire from his own party and would likely be challenged in the Pennsylvania Senatorial primary next year. "I have decided to run for re-election in 2010 in the Democratic primary," he said in a statement early this afternoon.  Saying that he felt his politics were more in line with the Democrats at this point, Specter assured voters and the public that he would likely remain as independent as a Democrat, as he had been as a Republican. "Change in party affiliation does not mean that I will be a party-line voter any more for the Democrats that I have been for the Republicans," he said.

Spector has served in the Senate since 1980, and was selected as one of Time Magazine’s top senators in 2006. His party switch would give the Democrats a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate, should Minnesota Democrat Al Franken be seated.

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for barbara-barnett

Article Author: Barbara Barnett

Follow Barbara on Twitter. Barbara Barnett grew up on politics and pop culture. Her professional life has been eclectic, because her left brain doesn't know what her right brain really wants. Her real passions are writing, music, reading--and House.

Visit Barbara Barnett's author pageBarbara Barnett's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • Never Give In: Battling Cancer in the Senate Never Give In: Battling Cancer in the Senate

    This is not simply the memoir of a cancer survivor. Nor is it just the memoir of a respected senator. This is an unprecedented glimpse into a man who is both. It is inspiration for people of all political ...

Article comments

  • 1 - Dave Nalle

    Apr 28, 2009 at 1:28 pm

    I think this is basically a disaster for the GOP. As a Republican Specter was at least under some pressure from the party and his constituents to vote on the right side of some issues. As a Democrat he'll be under pressure to vote more to the left. When Franken gets seated this means the GOP has no voice in either house of Congress. That's not a good thing.

    Dave

  • 2 - Baronius

    Apr 28, 2009 at 1:59 pm

    I'm recalling all the times that Specter claimed to be a good Republican. He hated the PA conservatives for questioning his loyalty to the party. Guess who was right? And Dave, remember this when you talk about how unreliable the religious right is.

  • 3 - Jen

    Apr 28, 2009 at 2:13 pm

    Hi Barbara, I was waiting for your House report and it appears the website has changed the format. But, I like current events especially in Politics so it all works out! I cannot believe the episode from last nite! I'll check back later for your take on our blue eyed hero!

  • 4 - barbara barnett

    Apr 28, 2009 at 7:18 pm

    Specter has been very outside the Repub norm for a very long time. He tried very hard to "toe the line" and ultimately his political fortunes would have turned south during the 2010 primary. He really had no choice.
    Jen--article will be up probably very late tonight or early tomorrow morning. Glad you stopped by.

  • 5 - Baronius

    Apr 28, 2009 at 9:12 pm

    He has the choice of accepting the will of his party and stepping down after three decades of service. For that matter, he could follow the lead of Phil Gramm and resign his seat, switch parties, and run again. He could also follow Joe Lieberman, and run as an independent. Or he could creepily attempt to hang on to power by turning his back on his party.

  • 6 - Dave Nalle

    Apr 28, 2009 at 11:44 pm

    The republican norm may be changing. It's likely not changing in Specter's direction, but I don't think Toomey offers much better compatibility for the future.

    Dave

  • 7 - Cannonshop

    Apr 29, 2009 at 3:10 am

    I think it's not stunning-it's "Finally". As in "Finally, his Party Affiliation and his Politics Match!"

  • 8 - Baronius

    Apr 29, 2009 at 1:45 pm

    Dave, I don't know what you've got against Toomey. He's one of those Club For Growth brains, who favor tax reform and free trade and hate Huckabee. That's right up your alley. The only thing I can think of that you wouldn't like about Toomey is his pro-life record. If you want to be a single-issue pro-choicer, are you sure that you're in the right party?

  • 9 - bliffle

    Apr 29, 2009 at 8:28 pm

    Perhaps Spector was waterboarded by the Obama administration into changing his party.

    Maybe Obama read the brilliant defenses of waterboarding right here on BC and decided "by Jove, that's a great idea! And legal, too!"

    So, maybe, the socialist goons in the Obama political machine kidnapped Spector and took him to the Secret Room under the whitehouse (left behind by the previous administration) and dunked him until he confessed his sins and agreed to become a democrat.

    Maybe.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Feb 09, 2010

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for January

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs

Upcoming Stories from Blogcritics
  •