So why the tirade? Well, it’s quite simple. Today I had a conversation with a close friend who happens to be a Union steward. The first ten minutes of our conversation was about the current economic crisis and the state of global affairs thanks to the stewardship (or the lack thereof) of George W. Bush. He went on and on about the Republicans and so many people out of work. Blah, blah, blah. I heard it for a year and I’m still hearing it. So as our conversation progressed I asked him how HE was doing? How’s the prospect for work? He replied, “Hey, I’m in the union. They promised me work no matter what because I helped get their man (Governor Deval Patrick) in. And I worked hard for Obama.” Well, good for you, I thought.
“So, buddy, do you think there’ll be enough funding for work until through the summer?"
“Are you kidding me? I’m working 6 days a week, 13 hours a day. Dude, I’m getting so much overtime, it’s not even funny.”
Whoa. Wait a minute.
“I thought you said things were bad?”
“Well, for me they’re damn good,” he exclaimed, “I’ll always have work. We’ve got those contracts.”
“A lot of guys getting overtime,” I asked.
“Oh yeah, there’s a few of us getting 25 – 35 hours of overtime a week.”
“I’ve got a question for you.”
“What’s that?”
“Why can’t you guys give up your overtime and pout a couple of more people on the payroll, even if it’s only for a month?”
“Hey, dude, I gotta eat.”
Well, I won’t get into the rest of the conversation but suffice it to say I went on a rant that will probably be irreparable.
My point is this. We’re all in this together. It’s going to take all of us to get out of it. We need to get involved. We need to stay focused. And we need to make sure that those who represent us – including elected union officials – do their job to represent us and deliver for our common good. We’ve counted on politicians. Look where we are. We look toward union leadership to secure our jobs. When will the last Chrysler be manufactured in this country? We can’t count on those we elect, folks. We have to count on ourselves and each other. From the perspective of my small business I am planning on doing my part. It isn’t much but I’m trying. Now all I’m asking is that you try, too.







Article comments
1 - Brunelleschi
Reading all 4 pages made me dizzy.
:)
It sounds like you have a chip on your shoulder.
Unions are not organized to change industry or lead it. They represent workers. If unions adapt attitudes of management, and union workers act too "entitled," they are just echoes of the system they work in. They didn't invent it and they don't own it.
2 - Lumpy
With Obama in power we can expect huge increases in abusive union power. A federal ban on right to work laws and open ballot mandates to make sure union members toe the line for their bosses. A sad turn when what we really need is some trustbusting on the labor monopoly.
3 - Silas Kain
Try a boulder on my shoulder. It's an opinion piece, albeit a rant. But if you read between the lines, my friend, you will see that your point about organized labor is right on. The problem is Union Management acts more like a friend to political powerhouses than an advocate of its membership.
4 - Al Barger
Of course, the soundtrack here should be Dylan's "Union Sundown." "Sure was a good idea till greed got in the way."
But I don't believe in all this "buy American" crap at all to start with. It's cheap racism or nationalism. Mexicans got to eat same as we do. And consider also in that case that more American firms building and hiring people there would take off some of the pressure for them to come here illegally.
But generally speaking, buying the best product for the best price is the American way - the one that has made us so successful for so many years. And hell no, I'm not going to pay for the extra $2,000 or so in cost for a GM car to cover their crazy union fees than for a Toyota (perhaps built 20 miles from me at their newly opened Greensburg plant) that is also built with well paid American labor.
5 - Roger Nowosielski
You're right on principle, Al, wrong on sentiment. And no! It's not true it's "American attitude." If it is, then America had gone down the toilet. Fifty years ago, it would be unthinkable. America ruled and your own neighbors would have thought you "un-American" and would have chased you from their midst. Not that I would commend that.
Sure, Mexicans have got to eat. But what has it got to do with us. It's their problem, unless of course you're going to embrace the notion of a gentler, more caring nation - surely a Republican idea as George Herbert Bush had demonstrated in the first place: he was proud of having "the brown ones," remember.
6 - Silas Kain
Al, I get your point as well. What I failed to articulate is that I am most outraged over the overtime dollars than anything else. What Union "stewards" or "favored laborers" are getting all the overtime in their respective locals while "less favored" unionistas still wait in the cold for a chance to go out on a site? This piece is geared toward rank and file union members who aren't getting the "perks" their co-members are getting. The next point was those states and municipalities which are required to hire union companies had best insure that the tax dollars being paid to these firms are not going to "overtime". I'm all for an infusion of tax dollars into the infrastructure. Perhaps it's socialist, but it is necessary. My fear is that these union companies who reap the rewards will perpetuate past practices. This time around we need to be vigilant. Every penny must be accounted for. Public dollars require transparency. This is OUR money, folks. We have to account to the Internal Revenue Service, it is time for the government (elected, union and religious) to account to us.
7 - Brunelleschi
Silas-
What do you expect unions to do? Negotiate contracts then stay home and function as a glee club? Management has been busy in Washington since before unions exixted fighting for themselves.
Anti-union laws exist. Unions HAVE to be political, and work within the political system and become what they are fighting (another management). It's reality.
8 - Silas Kain
I'm not disputing that, Brunelleschi. Perhaps the labor unions would be best served if they became their OWN political party, i.e. the Labor Party. It's not such a bad idea. How many overtime hours are being used these days in union shops? And if these overtime hours are chronic, why aren't the union halls distributing that work equitably among its' membership? Is that so unreasonable to ask? The unions are front and center in screaming about the economy and jobless rates. If one Union hall is shelling out 120 hours a week in overtime every week, that means there are 3 union members who are not getting 40 hours work. If my math is wrong, correct it.
9 - Ruvy
Silas,
Eventually I knew you would come to the doors of syndicalism. Syndicalism is all about making private enterprise work for justice for the working stiff. An you are a fellow who believes in justice.
The AMERICAN unions were all designed about sucking off the profits of the company without ever thinking abut how to make the product better.
Samuel Gomper's four letter word - MORE.
EUROPEAN unions were all about controlling the company for the betterment of the worker - which usually involved, among other things, making a quality product.
The ONLY route out of this mess for Americans is to adopt the European model and stop feeding the union stewards overtime and privileges.
Think about it, dude.
10 - Brunelleschi
Silas-
You are really stretching the labor/overtime issue to try and make a political issue out of it. Why?
I really don't think my own work, happiness, freedom, or my options are dependent on one labor group's overtime stats. I really don't care what they make.
It's just not a national policy issue.
11 - Brunelleschi
Ruvy-
What a bunch of nonsense.
Since when is it a labor organization's responsibility to make the product better? That is 100% management's responsibility.
America's economic model is set and matured. It starts with Locke and his ideas on the necessity to protect middle class male's property from arbitrary appropriation from above.
The US constitution reflects Locke's ideas. This was pre-industrialization, pre-union, pre-multinational mega corporations. Still we are stuck with it and it's not going to change much, even if there are better examples to follow.
12 - Silas Kain
Make a political issue of it? Stretching? Let me ask you this. A private union company is contracted by a government agency to perform a job. The job is saddled with cost overruns, more specifically overtime costs. There is a huge increase of unemployed -- INCLUDING union members. THAT, my friend, IS a political issue. There was a time when union membership took an active role in producing quality products. But, like everything else, they became complacent. In many respects union management is almost as guilty as corporate honchos in the outsourcing of American jobs. There's no doubt that we're transitioning to a new kind of economy. If labor unions are to maintain an active role in the new American economy there has to be transparency when it comes to government contracted jobs, period.
I am in complete agreement with Ruvy in his call on European labor unions. American corporations who adopt a European model may find themselves in a better position when this economy turns around. This is about union management and their moral responsibility to their membership. In a booming economy overtime costs are inevitable. In a virtually dead economy, there should be NO overtime dollars paid, period. That's why we have union halls where members stand in line in the dawn hoping that this will be a day when they see work. That is equity. That is justice. That was once the American way.
13 - Brunelleschi
I wanted to follow your line but you lost me.
You are throwing all your broken chips at once.
How do the cost over runs (out of control overtime) change employment data? Are these related or different rants?
Out of control overtime is a local problem, not national news. Big deal.
Again, quality is the responsibility of management. A happy crew with the right tools does a good job.
It just looks like you have a lot of incoherent beefs with unions.
14 - Brunelleschi
OK, I don't share the obvious bias and anger spilling out from some of you, but I have a funny union story for ya...
A few years ago, I arrive at a basketball arena in the NE to photograph an indoor motorsports event. It was a weekend hobby at the time, but I sold photos to a network.
After picking up the "backstage pass," I'm approached by two union people, who ask if I am shooting for show management, etc. I tell them no, they ask a lot of nosey questions about my business and I avoid details.
Finally, they say, since I got my pass from show management, and they don't have the same equipment as me (cameras), that this fellow from the union will shadow me all night, and be paid the weekend rate....wait right here we have to get your details...
I pretend to cooperate, then I ditched them! I told show management about it and they managed to shuffle them here and there and I think they gave up.
I still don't hate them. I just think they are goofy sometimes.
15 - bliffle
The UAW made a couple of bad mistakes over the past 30 years. One was throwing their lot in with the Big3 in national politics. That removed one of the important voices for Big3 management change that could have averted this catastrophe. If the UAW had taken a strong stand on better mileage and less pollution, taking a long-range view for their membership instead of slavishly following managements short-term view, we'd all be better off for it.
The second was chaining their fortunes to the Big3 by accepting future rewards over immediate rewards, in the form of extravagant pension promises instead of pay raises. Promises that were entirely controlled by management. They surrendered their independence and became puppets of the Big3 managers.
The UAW rendered themselves powerless.
The UAW is so powerless that they cannot be responsible for the Big3 failures. Toyota is losing money this year and they don't employ any UAW workers.
16 - Ruvy
Brunelleschi,
[Personal attack deleted by Comments Editor]
No economic system is set in stone. Either you adapt and develop a system that delivers economic justice - or someone takes over from outside and screws you over royally. That appears where you are headed now under the banking elite Obama represents (Bush represented the oil elite - the other side of a stinking pack of thieves).
Hey dude! It's your country. I USED to live there and understand what it would take to bring about a measure of economic justice. But it's your country and if you want the sharp rod up of outside control shoved up your butt, knock yourself out. It ain't my problem.
We USED to have a system that delivered economic justice in Israel - but it got corrupted and was finally abandoned for your sick model of exploitation - which stinks royally!
17 - Brunelleschi
Ruvy-
My point is that American THINKING about a just economy dates back to Locke. It's 18th century, and won't change.
What the US constitution founders got from Locke was the part about the government ensuring the security of private property. This was to develop a strong middle class, and they needed to be protected from arbitrary seizure of property from a despot.
It's so engrained into American thinking, it's lasted through industrialization and globalization (so far).
I think you find it stronger in GOP true-believers and libertarians. This business about you work hard, save, own, invest, and follow personal responsibility and everything will be fine is GOP 101 rhetoric.
It's a meme.
18 - chinamanufacturer
China has a leading role in the global economy today, and it is one of the most important industrial producers.
19 - Silas Kain
It also has a corrupt system in place which allows the rich to remain rich and the poor to live in virtual lives of servitude. But how else does a government control such a blown out population? Chinese products are inferior. Chinese food products cannot be trusted. Chinese medical samples used in medical research are not reliable. I could go on and on about good ol' China.