Okay, I made up the last part, but the librarians aren't responding terribly well to Ashcroft's peace offering from last week. PW NewsLine writes:
- "The FBI has a history, which Attorney General Ashcroft is ignoring, of violating civil liberties," says Chris Finan, president of American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression. "So our concern that this could happen again certainly has precedent and historical support. The question of whether or not there have been any bookstores searched at this point gives us cool comfort."
....Ashcroft also promised to declassify data on how the Justice Department has used Section 215 of the Patriot Act in relation to bookstores and libraries--then said that, in fact, the department had never used the broad search powers
granted by the section.
"I hope it's true," says Emily Sheketoff, executive director of the American Library Association. "I think that that is a very clear indication that the Justice Department doesn't need this authority and they should be supporting us to amend the Patriot Act."
....Sheketoff expresses bafflement at the personal tone of Ashcroft's criticisms last week. He accused the ALA and other groups of spreading "baseless hysteria" about the Act. "I can't understand them," Sheketoff says. "You know librarians, we're not a scary bunch."
I've known some TOTALLY scary librarians, by the way. Based upon this reaction, it sounds like the librarians don't know how to respond to the assertion that the element of the Patriot Act they have been so up in arms over has never even been used - they sound a bit ... disappointed. But freedom to read as we see fit without interference or intimidation is a core right and one worth getting a bit, um, hysterical over.
.jpg?t=20120527181101)
Article comments
1 - Johno
Eric,
Reason Magazine links to this article from the Washington Times in which former assistant attorney general Viet Dinh is quoted as saying that libraries had been contacted under Sec. 215 of the Patriot Act "about 50" times in 2002, and a survey of libraries found sixty such instances.
Moral as he may be, I don't trust John Ascroft to defend my best interests as a citizen any farther than I can spit a rat.
By the way, my wife is a librarian, and she is indeed scary.
2 - Natalie Davis
Let's hear it for scary librarians! I would wager than none is as scary as John Ashcroft and his unAmerican Patriot Act. Moral? Ashcroft? As if.
3 - Johno
John Ashcroft is eminiently moral. Does that imply he's ethical, empathetic, or sensitive to the points of view of the rest of America? Not so much.
4 - BRICKLAYER
Fof some truly scary librarians, pleasee see:
http://www.bmeworld.com/gailcat/