Last Tango in Texas: Obama Dances Across History

Part of: Strictly Political

With all the hoopla surrounding the headlines of an historic moment and Barack Obama waiting quietly in the wings to claim victory before a crowd of 17,000 in St. Paul, Texas’ final convention is forgotten.

Obama is finally the party-elect nominee. The primaries of South Dakota and Montana provide the music for this waltz across the finish line. However, the final pledged delegates will be partitioned to Obama and Clinton in Austin, Texas June 6-7, 2008 so “[t]he state convention will then elect the 67 [remaining] delegates to the national convention.”  I believe a good estimate will give Obama upwards of 35-50 Texas delegates — hoisting him comfortably over the top.

And if politics were a dance it would be the tango. It takes two to tango and the rules include: competitiveness, head snaps, holding, and leading.  In the dance, as in politics, one has to anticipate and predict the moves of the partner even though the choreography is planned and rehearsed off stage and away from the glare of critics. Translation: politics like dance is destiny. The TV and radio pundits have been nothing short of gleeful as they watch this contest capture critical mass.

The choice of dance partner — Billary means never having to say you’re sorry.

And thus it is merely the woman’s personality. She has never apologized for stepping on  the feet of the populace. Despite that, Heloise has maintained two things: one, dance fever aside, HRC should be the VP choice. And two, that the oft-painted dissolute Bill will play a brokerage role in creating what others have dubbed the “dream ticket.” Just today when it was brought up, HRC replied without missing a beat, “I’m open to it.” I told you so.

Numbers matter. The results of this primary season have only borne out the inevitable: More people have voted for Hillary and Barack than any other Democratic candidate in the history of primaries. Their estimated combined popular vote total: 35,246,910! If you include Puerto Rico’s count of 384,578 = 35,631,488, and in fairness HRC does lead BHO by a few thousand in popular vote, no biggie. 

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for heloise

Article Author: Heloise

Author, writer, physics teacher has a new blog The Trough where she writes. Also visit The Politikos which highlights her keen observation of anthropology, occultism, science/research into rebirth. She combines spirituality and politics as no other. …

Visit Heloise's author pageHeloise's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • Counselor: A Life at the Edge of History Counselor: A Life at the Edge of History

    In this gripping memoir, John F. Kennedy's closest advisor recounts in full for the first time his experience counseling Kennedy through the most dramatic moments in American history. ...

  • Londonistan Londonistan

Article comments

  • 1 - Dan Miller

    Jun 04, 2008 at 10:51 am

    Heloise,

    You say,

    "More people have voted for Hillary and Barack than any other Democratic candidate in the history of primaries. Their estimated combined popular vote total: 35,246,910! If you include Puerto Rico’s count of 384,578 = 35,631,488. . .
    I am confident that addition of the numbers yields the sums posted in the article, but I must wonder whether you should add or subtract. How many who voted for Senator Clinton did so because they could not stand Senator Obama, and how many who voted for Senator Obama did so because they could not stand Senator Clinton? My guess is that there are many in both categories, although I have absolutely no idea how many. If that is the case, the "dream ticket" may actually be a "nightmare ticket."

    Dan

  • 2 - Mike

    Jun 04, 2008 at 10:51 am

    Check the RCP site again. Hillary did NOT win the popular vote. The only way you can say she won is if you don't include the popular vote estimate from those caucus sites or decide to give her all her votes from Michigan while giving Obama none from that state.

  • 3 - Clavos

    Jun 04, 2008 at 11:31 am

    Why would you count the PR vote?

    Puerto Ricans cannot and will not vote in the general.

    Their numbers are meaningless.

  • 4 - Andy Marsh

    Jun 04, 2008 at 11:34 am

    I thought all US territories voted in general elections???!! I don't believe they have electoral college representation, but they do get to vote...of course, I could be wrong...it's happened before...

  • 5 - Clavos

    Jun 04, 2008 at 11:44 am

    Sorry for all the repeats, folks!!

    Andy,

    Don't know if this is why, but PR is not a territory; it's a semi-independent Commonwealth. Puerto Ricans not only don't have the vote themselves, they don't have voting reps in DC.

    On the other hand, they don't pay federal income tax, either.

  • 6 - Dr Dreadful

    Jun 04, 2008 at 11:48 am

    Clav, I know MT is being a bitch right now, but click the Publish button once and once only. It should post OK.

  • 7 - Clavos

    Jun 04, 2008 at 11:57 am

    My frustrated "Dammit" post was precisely because I know to click the "Publish" button only once and did so.

    I have no idea why one click resulted in multiple copies.

  • 8 - Ruvy

    Jun 04, 2008 at 11:58 am

    This just in a bit ago on Ynetnews. Bush congratulates Obama on Democratic nomination.

    US President George W. Bush offered his congratulations to Sen. Barack Obama for securing the Democratic presidential nomination, White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said on Wednesday.

    "President Bush congratulates Sen. Obama for clinching the Democratic party's 2008 nomination for president," Perino told reporters.
    (Reuters)

  • 9 - Andy Marsh

    Jun 04, 2008 at 11:59 am

    I never have understood that commonwealth thing. I live in the commonwealth of Virginia. I don't know what the hell that means, but at least I get to vote! Wouldn't mind the not paying income taxes thing though...

  • 10 - Andy Marsh

    Jun 04, 2008 at 12:05 pm

    Why'd they have a primary then? Isn't that like Canada having a primary?

  • 11 - Clavos

    Jun 04, 2008 at 12:19 pm

    Andy,

    Here's a brief description of the structure and function of the Puerto Rican government and its status within the larger framework of its relationship to the US. The description is from Wikipedia.

    Puerto Rico has a republican form of government,[21] subject to U.S. jurisdiction and sovereignty.[2] Its current powers are all delegated by the United States Congress and lack full protection under the United States Constitution. Puerto Rico's head of state is the President of the United States. The government of Puerto Rico, based on the formal republican system, is composed of three branches: Executive, Legislative, and Judicial. The Executive branch is headed by the Governor, currently Mr. Anibal Acevedo Vila. The Legislative branch consists of a bicameral Legislative Assembly made up of a Senate upper chamber and a House of Representatives lower chamber. The Senate is headed by the President of the Senate, while the House of Representatives is headed by the Speaker of the House. The Judicial branch is headed by the Chief Justice of the Puerto Rico Supreme Court. The legal system is a mix of the civil law and the common law systems. The governor and legislators are elected by popular vote every four years. Members of the Judicial branch are appointed by the governor with the "advice and consent" of the Senate.

    Puerto Rico has limited representation in the U.S. Congress in the form of a nonvoting delegate, formally called a Resident Commissioner (currently Luis Fortuño). The current Congress has returned the Commissioner's power to vote in the Committee of the Whole, but not on matters where the vote would represent a decisive participation.[22] Puerto Rican elections are governed by the Federal Election Commission;[23][24] While residing in Puerto Rico, Puerto Ricans cannot vote in U.S. presidential elections, but they can vote in primaries. Puerto Ricans who become residents of a U.S. state can vote in presidential elections.


    Usually, they don't hold a primary; they just have non-binding (obviously) caucuses. I don't know why they decided to hold a primary this time.

  • 12 - Cindy D

    Jun 04, 2008 at 5:15 pm

    @#8

    wooohooo!!

  • 13 - Cindy D

    Jun 04, 2008 at 5:26 pm

    @#1

    Dan,

    I supported Obama and I didn't care for Hillary as president. I don't find the idea of Hillary as objectionable as Vice President. I am not sure how many people would feel this way. It may or may not be relevant.

  • 14 - bliffle

    Jun 04, 2008 at 6:40 pm

    I think Obama has demonstrated considerable strategic skill dealing with the adversities he's confronted in the primaries, from all this religious and race commotion right through dealing with the formidable and (potentially) destructive Clinton campaign. It appears that he is dealing very adroitly with the Hillary situation even as he pulls into the leadeship position in his party.

    I hope that if he is elected president that those same skills are applied equally well to handling the economic and foreign affairs problem we in the USA always have to face. I think his performance so far is very encouraging.

    IMO we would have been better off the last 8 years if Carl Rove had applied his considerable savvy to solving our economic and policy problems, rather than the trivial goal of merely getting GWB elected. We'd have been better off if Rove had been boss rather than just serving a dimwit effectively in achieving mean political goals.

  • 15 - Cindy D

    Jun 04, 2008 at 11:40 pm

    Here is an interesting article from 2006:

    Clinton-Obama Ticket Stirs Fear in GOP

    "...some Republican advisers to the White House and leading 2008 hopefuls Sen. John McCain and Rudy Giuliani see the ticket as an easy winner built on the enthusiasm it would generate in Democratic circles.

    Their theory is that Clinton would stand a good chance to pick up the states that Sen. John Kerry won in 2004. While not enough to win the election on her own, the addition of Obama would help push closely divided states like Ohio over into the Democratic column, thereby giving the Clinton-Obama ticket the White House."

  • 16 - Cindy D

    Jun 04, 2008 at 11:57 pm

    Personally, I would like to see an Obama/Gore ticket. I think that would be unbeatable.

  • 17 - Dave Nalle

    Jun 05, 2008 at 4:12 am

    Gore would never take second spot to a newb like Obama. Obama needs to hook up with a solid, mediocre but respected figure who won't overshadow him. Joe Biden or Bill Richardson would be the best choices. I'd push for Richardson, personally. He might help break Obama out of his marxist rut.

    Dave

  • 18 - Cindy D

    Jun 05, 2008 at 9:12 am

    Yeah, I agree about Gore. When a supporter asked Obama, Obama said something about Vice President being a step-down for Gore. It would have had to have been Gore/Obama. Now that would have been a great democratic ticket.

  • 19 - Clavos

    Jun 05, 2008 at 10:34 am

    In any case, Gore has clearly and unequivocally indicated that he's no longer interested in politics, now that he's been anointed the Pope of the Church of Global Warming.

  • 20 - MAOZ

    Jun 05, 2008 at 1:32 pm

    Cindy @#13 -- If, like me, you were old enough to remember Vice President Lyndon Johnson -- or even if you were just old enough to remember Vice President Gerald Ford -- you would appreciate the importance of the choice of vice-presidential candidate.

  • 21 - Cindy D

    Jun 05, 2008 at 2:10 pm

    MAOZ,

    I have to say thanks. I wasn't paying enough attention to VP. I guess that preliminarily out of some of the possible choices I like Bill Richardson--a lot.

    What really scares me is that Dave @#17 likes Richardson.

    Dave? what am I missing?

  • 22 - Dan Miller

    Jun 06, 2008 at 11:31 am

    Clav,

    I think it is the Church of Global Smarming.

    Dan

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 11, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs