Knoxville Horror: Trial Dates Set; MSM “Discovers” Case; Bloggers Continue Spreading Rumors - Page 3

Cobbins’ ex-con brother, Lemaricus Davidson, was charged with the same 46 counts as Cobbins, and is scheduled to go on trial for them on July 14, 2008. (According to published reports, Eric Dewayne Boyd, 34, told federal agents that Davidson had confessed to him that he had murdered – “choked” – Channon Christian.) Davidson, convicted in Tennessee in 2001 of federal carjacking charges, a death penalty-eligible crime, and in spite of being a problem prisoner – but who among us is perfect? – served but a token sentence of at most five years, and was released only shortly before his alleged crime spree.

In addition to the initial 46-count indictment handed down against Davidson on February 1, earlier this month, he was indicted on six additional state felony counts in the January 8 armed robbery of an employee in a local Pizza Hut, the attempted armed robbery of a female customer in the restaurant, and weapons possession charges. (Not noticing that Davidson allegedly had a gun trained on her when he allegedly tried to grab the customer’s purse, she resisted, and the “bewildered” robber was allegedly left holding the ripped strap.)

Davidson’s next court date in the Pizza Hut case is September 27, 2007.

The allegations so far are that beginning in the wee hours, Davidson spent all of January 7 variously carjacking, kidnapping, robbing, torturing and gang-raping Christopher Newsom and Channon Christian, and murdering Christian, and then headed out the next day, to rob people at the Pizza Hut. Busy fellow, he.

Ex-con George Thomas, likewise indicted on the same 46 counts, is scheduled for trial on August 11, 2008. Thomas is charged with having shot Newsom to death. Deputy U.S. Marshal Rich Knighten reportedly said that Davidson wept when he was arrested.

Ex-con Eric Boyd has been charged federally, in U.S. District Court in Knoxville, with “being an accessory after the fact to carjacking,” for having allegedly helped Davidson flee apprehension. Boyd’s trial date has yet to be set. Boyd has not been charged with any of the state crimes. (Michelle Malkin also erroneously reported that Boyd was charged in the murders, kidnappings, and rapes of Christian and Newsom.)

Cobbins, Davidson, and Thomas were also charged federally with carjacking and two counts of federal weapons felonies, but at the request of the U.S. Attorney’s Office, a federal judge dismissed the federal charges “without prejudice” (meaning that they may later be reinstated), so that the Tennessee state prosecutions could go forward first.

Continued on the next page Page 1Page 2 — Page 3 — Page 4

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for nicholas-stix

Article Author: Nicholas Stix

New York-based, dissident journalist Nicholas Stix, has the dubious distinction of being arguably America's most frequently censored writer, having at different times outraged black supremacists, socialists, feminists, white supremacists, paleocons, neocons and libertarians. …

Visit Nicholas Stix's author pageNicholas Stix's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

— go to most recent comments
  • 1 - Dave Nalle

    May 29, 2007 at 4:50 am

    I find it incomprehensible that this story isn't all over the MSM. It's a real potential moneymaker. Are they just staying away because the perps are black and the victims are white?

    Dave

  • 2 - Nicholas Stix

    May 29, 2007 at 8:50 am

    Yup.

  • 3 - Clavos

    May 29, 2007 at 10:55 am

    The backstory about Svengali Media is chilling (and until now, unknown) to me.

    Thank you for bringing it to light.

  • 4 - Dr Dreadful

    May 29, 2007 at 11:49 am

    Oh boy.

    Just wait until Fox News gets hold of this one (if they haven't already - I haven't checked). It'll keep them happy for months.

  • 5 - Clavos

    May 29, 2007 at 12:13 pm

    In the spirit of full disclosure, a little searching on my part turned up a dispute between Mr. Stix and a blogger named David Mills, who writes under the handle of undercover black man.

    In his blog, Mr. Mills alleges that svengali media is a hoax.

    See this site for a further discussion of the controversy.

    The Knoxville TV station Channel 6 WATE has removed all references (it had featured an article) to svengali media from its site; lending credence to the allegation that it's a hoax.

  • 6 - Nicholas Stix

    May 29, 2007 at 12:19 pm

    "#3 " May 29, 2007 @ 10:55AM " Clavos [URL]

    "The backstory about Svengali Media is chilling (and until now, unknown) to me.

    "Thank you for bringing it to light."

    You're very welcome.

  • 7 - Nicholas Stix

    May 29, 2007 at 12:28 pm

    "#4 " May 29, 2007 @ 11:49AM " Dr Dreadful

    "Oh boy.

    "Just wait until Fox News gets hold of this one (if they haven't already - I haven't checked). It'll keep them happy for months."

    Actually, Fox News got a hold of the story, and let it go. Seven days ago, a Fox reporter did a non-story on the case, in which he and a reporter from their Knoxville affiliate, Erica Estep (sp.?), agreed that the crime was "too gruesome" to provide details.

  • 8 - Nicholas Stix

    May 29, 2007 at 12:50 pm

    "#5 -- May 29, 2007 @ 12:13PM -- Clavos [URL]

    "In the spirit of full disclosure, a little searching on my part turned up a dispute between Mr. Stix and a blogger named David Mills, who writes under the handle of undercover black man.

    "In his blog [hit link at #5], Mr. Mills alleges that svengali media is a hoax.

    "See this site [hit link at #5] for a further discussion of the controversy.

    "The Knoxville TV station Channel 6 WATE has removed all references (it had featured an article) to svengali media from its site; lending credence to the allegation that it's a hoax."

    Full disclosure? Really? It looks like your "thanks" and my "welcome" were premature, Clavos.

    There's no dispute between me and David Mills. I wrote about svengalimedia, and he claimed that it's a hoax site. I was under no obligation to get into that here, because it's a separate story, and because Mills' allegation is baseless.

    In fact, had you done the slightest digging, you'd find that I had already posted Mills' baseless charge and responded to it, at my own blog:

    "Undercover Black Man: Svengali Media of Knoxville Horror Notoriety a 'Hoax Site'"

    As for your second linked page, that provides no "further discussion of the controversy," but rather simply reprints the exchange between Mills and me, without any discussion. And far from the page supporting Mills' and your "full disclosure" contention, it is a svengalimedia page!

    Svengalimedia responded immediately to Mills' contention by posting the exchange on a svengali page, and by saying that Mills is less Net savvy than yours truly -- my first compliment from a black supremacist!

    As for your assertion that WATE's removal of "all references (it had featured an article) to Svengali Media from its site," far from "lending credence to the allegation that it's a hoax," that suggests merely that someone complained to WATE that Svengali is a black supremacist site that celebrates the murder, sexual mutilation, and dismemberment of people. Or are you saying that WATE only removed the Svengali references and article because it tolerates such like in the case of authentic black supremacist sites celebrating the murder, sexual mutilation, and dismember of people, but will not tolerate such like in the case of fake black supremacist sites?

  • 9 - Clavos

    May 29, 2007 at 1:04 pm

    "It looks like your "thanks" and my "welcome" were premature, Clavos."

    In particular my "thanks," was premature, yes.

    "There's no dispute between me and David Mills. I wrote about svengalimedia, and he claimed that it's a hoax site. I was under no obligation to get into that here, because it's a separate story, and because Mills' allegation is baseless."

    I can't think of a more accurate word than "dispute," even basing the characterization on your "explanation" (quoted above) of the dispute.

    You say it's genuine; he says it's a hoax.

    Sure sounds like a dispute to me.

  • 10 - Clavos

    May 29, 2007 at 1:09 pm

    Since WATE doesn't say why they removed references to the svangalimedia site from their own site, we can't really know their reasons, can we?

    Certainly is strange that a news organization would suppress a story with that kind of newsworthiness if it were genuine, though.

  • 11 - Dr Dreadful

    May 29, 2007 at 2:00 pm

    Seven days ago, a Fox reporter did a non-story on the case, in which he and a reporter from their Knoxville affiliate, Erica Estep (sp.?), agreed that the crime was "too gruesome" to provide details.

    That doesn't sound like Fox's MO at all. Maybe it really is a "non-story".

  • 12 - David Mills

    May 29, 2007 at 2:28 pm

    I'm trying to get into this conversation, but the software won't let me. I keep getting "Error: [20] Banned word." Which is very frustrating, because I have things to say...

  • 13 - Clavos

    May 29, 2007 at 3:48 pm

    David, the banned words are to foil spam, and aren't words like expletives or political words, or even racial epithets.

    The software can be circumvented by trying to figure out which is the offending word and replacing it with a synonym. You can also type it with spaces between each letter.

    The trick, of course, is figuring out which is the right word.

  • 14 - lumpy

    May 29, 2007 at 3:59 pm

    seems to me that even if u ignore the bit about the website the root story itself is pretty sensational.

  • 15 - Dr Dreadful

    May 29, 2007 at 4:02 pm

    Clav, I wondered about that when it happened to me the other day. I've seen some pretty eyebrow-singeing comments on here, and I was pretty sure mine wasn't anything like as offensive. I can't think what would have upset the filter: I mean, I didn't use the phrase 'increase your penis size'* or anything like that.

    *So if this comment gets through, I imagine the editors need to take their spam filter back to the store.

  • 16 - Clavos

    May 29, 2007 at 4:11 pm

    Dr. D,

    OK, now we know that one will get through.

    The only word I know for sure that's banned is the name for a large hall full of tables where people go to lose money; most of 'em are on reservations these days.

  • 17 - MCH

    May 29, 2007 at 4:43 pm

    "Chickenhawk" was banned for a while.

    (the word, not the creature.)

    ------------------------------

    Seems its usage struck a nerve with certain hierarchy...

  • 18 - Dr Dreadful

    May 29, 2007 at 5:51 pm

    Doesn't strictly have to be a reservation. One of our local tribes likes to buy up property downtown, call it 'tribal land' and then open one of those businesses full of the aforementioned tables and brightly-lit machines that make exciting jingly noises.

  • 19 - Christopher Rose

    May 29, 2007 at 5:53 pm

    The particular stopword impeding Mr Mills, who I reckon does have something interesting to tell us, is ". free". Without the space of course!

  • 20 - Nicholas Stix

    May 29, 2007 at 6:08 pm

    Free?

  • 21 - Clavos

    May 29, 2007 at 6:10 pm

    I DID want to hear what Mr. Mills had to say.

    Hope he reads your comment, Chris...

  • 22 - Christopher Rose

    May 29, 2007 at 6:14 pm

    Nicholas, look more carefully, then think about spam.

    Clavos, I have, you will, hopefully.

  • 23 - David Mills

    May 29, 2007 at 6:14 pm

    I think my insertion of a hyperlink may be the problem. But there is a webpage where the hoaxster himself labels svengalimedia as "cynical humor, more offensive than amusing."

    You can click to it from the May 27 post on my URL.

    Why Nicholas Stix would continue to describe this bit of Discordian mischief as a genuine "black supremacist" site is a mystery to me.

  • 24 - Dave Nalle

    May 29, 2007 at 7:18 pm

    My first assumption when I saw the site was that it was a highly developed sarcastic parody of some sort, perhaps that take was correct?

    Dave

  • 25 - David Lohr

    May 29, 2007 at 8:28 pm

    I mentioned the "alleged" details and then we published this update last week.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Dec 01, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for November

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs