It's Not Sexism, Stupid, or My Struggle With Hillary Clinton - Page 5

Like the fact that one of Bill's last acts in the White House was to pardon 15 Puerto Rican nationalist terrorists, actual terrorists who had set off bombs in our country that had killed and maimed people, against the advice of the Justice Department, the FBI, and the relatives of the people who got themselves exploded, but conveniently in time for his wife's campaign for a Senate seat in a state with the largest population of Puerto Ricans in the country. And when he started to get flack for it, he cheerfully threw Al Gore under the bus, claiming he'd done it to help Gore win Florida, and what a help it was, too! And now we find ourselves years down the road with Hillary Clinton insisting that she will stay in the race until the bitter end or, at the very least until Puerto Rico votes, and suddenly I'm feeling a little queasy, like someone flipped on a light and I caught a glimpse of something I didn't want to see scurrying under the counter. 

In this campaign Hillary Clinton has done what the Clintons do best, which is to fight hard and dirty. This is why we loved them in the beginning, right? They bested the Republicans at their own game. It doesn't matter if you get yourself covered in mud as long as your opponent drowns in it. Unlike Bill, who played dirty with a kind of insouciant, almost Reaganesque "Teflon" flair, Hillary Clinton has played dirty while wrapping herself in the shroud of victimhood. From the beginning Hillary Clinton was a feminist martyr, even when she was leading by a mile and the media discussed her as if she were already President. The spectacle of her complaining that debate mediators always asked her the first question was shameless and ridiculous. It was the Platonic ideal of that fake mole hill mountain.

So when confronted with things like the transparent insistence on seating the Michigan and Florida delegates, but only the way Hillary Clinton wants them seated, which is to say given entirely to her, even though it was her own campaign manager who helped draft the initial ruling that stripped the states of their delegates in the first place. Or Hillary transforming herself into a race baiting Annie Oakley. Or the discovery, after Barack Obama's profound and historic speech about race in America in which he defiantly did not condemn his pastor for speaking his own truth, that it was an ardent Hillary Clinton supporter who invited Jeremiah Wright to the National Press Club to give a speech which seemed intended to have a catastrophic effect on Obama's campaign. The surprise to me is not that she's participating in these things, The surprise to me is that anyone is surprised, or that anyone is blind to this. That anyone can look at Hillary Clinton and see a victim is the biggest mystery to me of all.

Continued on the next page Page 1Page 2Page 3Page 4 — Page 5 — Page 6

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for kati-irons

Article Author: Kati Irons

I am a film and music librarian for a public library system. Like many of my kind, I suffer from RKS, or Random Knowledge Syndrome. These musings are the inevitable end result of that condition.

Visit Kati Irons's author pageKati Irons's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Alesssandro

    May 29, 2008 at 11:23 pm

    Hey, this was good reading.

  • 2 - gwendolyn

    May 29, 2008 at 11:39 pm

    extremely good reading. thank you for putting my thoughts into words and much, much better than i ever could express. very smart.

  • 3 - Lola

    May 29, 2008 at 11:44 pm

    Well written and sadly accurate. Hillary has reduced this race to one of sexism, victimhood and rule changing. Not exactly the kind of role model I want for my daughter or the country.

  • 4 - Bob

    May 30, 2008 at 6:15 am

    Sexism is a two-way street; here's a term to ponder: Misandry

    Hillary, the Queen of Spin and a Legend in Her Own Mind!

  • 5 - bliffle

    May 30, 2008 at 7:57 am

    Good article! I agree.

  • 6 - jacksmith

    May 30, 2008 at 9:10 am

    DON'T BE DUPED AGAIN AMERICA !!!

    IT'S ABOUT ELECTABILITY !!!

    Large numbers of BUSH_McCain Republicans have been voting for Barack Obama in the DEMOCRATIC primaries, and caucuses from early on with the backing and help of the medical and insurance industry. Under the direction of the George Bush, and Karl Rove vote fraud, and vote manipulation machine. Because they feel Barack Obama would be a weaker opponent against John McCain. And they want to stop Hillary Clinton from fixing the HUGE! American, and Global mess they have created. shocking!!! isn't it. Just gotta love those good old draft dodging, silver spoon Texas boys. Not! :-(

    You see, the medical and insurance industry mostly support the republicans with the money they ripped off from you. And they don't want you to have quality, affordable universal health care. They want to be able to continue to rip you off, and kill you and your children by continuing to deny you life saving medical care that you have already paid for. So they can continue to make more immoral profits for them-selves off of you, and your children's suffering.

    With Hillary Clinton you are almost 100% certain to get quality affordable universal health care for everyone very soon. And you are also certain to see major improvements in the economy for everyone.

    The American people face even worse catastrophes ahead than the ones you are living through now. It will take all of the skills, and experience of Hillary Clinton to pull the American people out of this mess we are in. Fortunately fixing up, and cleaning up others incompetence, immoral degeneracy, and mess is what the Clinton's do very well.

    Hillary Clinton has actually won by much larger margins than the vote totals showed. And lost by much smaller vote margins than the vote totals showed. Her delegate count is actually much higher than it shows. And higher than Obama's. She also leads in the electoral college numbers that you must win to become President in the November national election. HILLARY CLINTON IS ALREADY THE TRUE DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE!

    Just look at Oregon for example. Obama won Oregon by about 70,000 votes. But approximately 79,000 Bush republicans switched party's back in January to vote for Obama in the democratic primary. They are not going to vote for, or support any Democrat in November. Are you DEMOCRATS going to put up with that. Are you that stupid, and weak. The Bush republicans think you are that stupid, and weak.

    As much as 30% of Obama's primary, and caucus votes are Republicans trying to choose the weakest democratic candidate for McCain to run against. These Republicans have been gaming the caucuses, and open primaries where it is easier to vote cheat. This is why Obama has not been able to win the BIG! states primaries. Even with Republican vote cheating help. Except North Carolina where 35% of the population is African American, and approximately 90% of them block voted for him. African Americans are only approximately 17% of the general population.

    Hillary Clinton has been OUT MANNED! and OUT SPENT! 4 and 5 to 1. Yet Obama has only been able to manage a very tenuous, and questionable tie with Hillary Clinton. This is even more phenomenal when you consider she has been also fighting against the George Bush, Karl Rove vote fraud machine in the DEMOCRATIC primaries, and caucuses. Hillary Clinton is STUNNING!.

    If Obama is the democratic nominee for the national election in November he will be slaughtered. That is crystal clear now. Because all of the Republican vote cheating help will suddenly evaporate. And the demographics, and experience are completely against him. All of this vote fraud and Bush republican manipulation has made Obama falsely look like a much stronger candidate than he really is.

    You will have another McGovern catastrophe where George McGovern lost 49 of 50 states. And was the reason the super-delegates were created to keep that from happening again. Don't let that happen to the party and America again super-delegates. You have the power to prevent it. The only important question now is who can best win in November. And the answer is HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON. That fact is also now crystal clear.

    And YOUNG PEOPLE. DON'T BE DUPED! Think about it. You have the most to lose. As do African Americans. Support Hillary Clinton. She will do her best for all of you. And she will know how to best get it done on day one.

    The democratic party needs to fix this outrage. Everyone needs to throw all your support to Hillary Clinton NOW! So you can end this outrage against YOU the voter, and against democracy.

    The democratic party, and the super-delegates have a decision to make. Are the democrats, and the democratic party going to choose the DEMOCRATIC party nominee to fight for the American people. Or are the republicans going to choose the DEMOCRATIC party nominee through vote fraud, and gaming the DEMOCRATIC party primaries, and caucuses.

    Fortunately the Clinton's have been able to hold on against this fraudulent outrage with those repeated dramatic, and heroic comebacks of Hillary Clinton’s. Only the Clinton’s are that resourceful, and strong. Hillary Clinton is your NOMINEE. They are the best I have ever seen. Probably the best there has ever been. :-)

    “This is not a game” (Hillary Clinton)

    Sincerely

    jacksmith... Working Class :-)

    p.s. Cynthia Ruccia - I'm with ya baby. All the way. "Clinton Supporters Count Too."

  • 7 - Kati

    May 30, 2008 at 11:22 am

    Thank you all for your great comments. Five out of six seem to agree I'm not ape monkey squirrel shit bananas, and if that's good enough for the dentists, it's good enough for me!

    Hillary Clinton did have an opportunity to give us Health Care reform, the best opportunity this country has ever had. If another politician had biffed it as badly as she did, do you think Hillary Clinton would advise giving them a second chance?

  • 8 - bliffle

    May 30, 2008 at 2:00 pm

    Jacksmith is over the top, but there's a good point underlying his tirade: our preoccupation with the dem horserace has really obliterated consideration of the relative merits of Clinton and Obama policies. Every minute we consider pondering the Michigan/Florida mess is time NOT spent reviewing the policies of the candidates.

    The only candidate getting consideration of policy is McCain, and that probably works slightly against him.

    Personally, I don't care much about the MI/FL delegates, but I'd like to hear more about, for example, the facets of the Clinton and Obama health plans. Offhand, it seems to me that Obama may be repeating the mistakes that Clinton made 15 years ago, and that Clinton has improved her ideas considerably. But that's based on the scanty info I can find on their websites, NOT on thorough and penetrating discussions in the public media, like the internet and blogosphere.

  • 9 - Baronius

    May 30, 2008 at 4:27 pm

    Kati, I don't think you're crazy, but I'm sure you'd think that I am. I'm a conservative. There are plenty of us who don't like the tone of modern politics. If you look into it a little more, you'll see that the lowering of political discourse isn't "our" game.

    Either way, this is some good writing.

  • 10 - Holly

    May 30, 2008 at 6:03 pm

    This is excellent and, even though I am one who does not like the light shone too brightly on Bill C. (I prefer to remember him hazily), you are right on. Thank you!

  • 11 - Kati

    May 30, 2008 at 6:09 pm

    Baronius - I don't think you're crazy because you're conservative. I'm one of those nutty people who believe that good people represent all points of view.

    Slate has an interesting article about our current fear of vote tampering and election stealing. Each side is equally convinced that the other side actively practices vote supression and voter fraud. The Democrats were radicalized by 2000 and before that Nixon, while Nixon was motivated by anger at things like the Daley Democratic political machine.

    If we conduct politics based on doing to our opponents before they even consider doing to us, we'll never elevate ourselves out of this mire.

  • 12 - Baronius

    May 30, 2008 at 7:11 pm

    Kati, I agree that politics gets too dirty, on both sides of the aisle. But you said the opposite in your article, admiring Bill's ability to beat the Republicans at "their" game.

    Your shock at the carnage the Clintons leave in their wake seems about sixteen years late. I remember the Clinton campaign's contempt for Bill's old lovers. We were told at the time that personal morality had nothing to do with an officeholder's performance. In retrospect, it's obvious that we were seeing the Clintons' lack of interest in the consequences of their actions. How many houses do you have to burn down before you get labelled an arsonist?

  • 13 - bliffle

    May 30, 2008 at 9:29 pm

    In defense of Hillary, perhaps she is trying to counteract the seeming submission of the 2000 Gore campaign when they vacillated and allowed themselves to be bullied by James Baker. She's sending a warning to foes that she's not going to knuckle under in the face of aggression. Maybe she figures to elicit a fighting style from Obama that will strengthen the eventual dem nominee, either way.

    Maybe.

  • 14 - Clavos

    May 30, 2008 at 9:38 pm

    ...More likely, she's just overweeningly ambitious and self-centered.

  • 15 - bliffle

    May 31, 2008 at 7:20 am

    Thanks, Clavos, for restating that abundantly overly repeated premise. Not very interesting.

  • 16 - Clavos

    May 31, 2008 at 10:55 am

    Why, you're welcome, bliffle.

    Apparently, the premise hasn't been "abundantly overly repeated," enough, since you obviously remain among the deluded fools who haven't yet perceived its veracity.

  • 17 - Christopher Rose

    May 31, 2008 at 12:39 pm

    I looked up overweening just to check and got "excessive: unrestrained, especially with regard to feelings; presumptuously arrogant;".

    Aren't all politicians pretty much "overweeningly ambitious and self-centered"? The peculiar demands of contemporary party politics make it almost inevitable, although some of them are better at hiding it than others. Whether that is ultimately a plus is a judgement call.

  • 18 - Clavos

    May 31, 2008 at 1:15 pm

    Absolutely agree with you, Mr. Rose.

    Hillary seems to be blessed with an overabundance, even for a pol.

  • 19 - bliffle

    May 31, 2008 at 9:16 pm

    I remarked Hillarys selfishness a long time ago. Perhaps it is true that Hillary is so self-centered that everyone is long aware of it. Does anyone deny it?

  • 20 - Marge

    Jun 01, 2008 at 10:28 pm

    Hillary, is our only hope of Change. Real change, not just words. This country has been managed by one side of the brain, (factual) men think with one side, women with the other..It's time for complete change. We hear it after every election, things will get better, life will be better, jobs, will be more abundant. Yeh right, a chicken in every pot...It's to the point,the the american people are loosing the pot in which to cook the chicken, and their entire homes,jobs, existance..
    I am convinced with every fiber of my being, that Hillary is the one, to put all that back in order, NOT O'BAMA, he's just words,and empty suite. Hillary has the drive, conviction, and knowledge it will take in order for us to have real change and for the betterment of this country. Stand behind her, she will do all of us proud....

  • 21 - bliffle

    Jun 01, 2008 at 11:18 pm

    Marge,

    I believe that Hillary has more of those menacing qualities you mentioned than any mere man in this campaign. Let me put it this way: she's more macho than me (other guys can speak for themselves).

    But I think that her ego-drenched persona misses (as we mere men so often demonstrate in our own aberrant willful behavior) that the larger social success is NOT guaranteed by our personal ascendancy to great power.

    I can cite various, assorted, and, many examples where we mere men have demonstrated such, if need be. But I'm sure you know the Catechism Of Male Failure.

    One is advised not to follow a model that has lead to such frequent failure, lest one not only be labeled a failure also, but a fool as well.

  • 22 - bliffle

    Jun 02, 2008 at 4:00 pm

    At the same time I'm becoming rather fond of Hillary for her bold cutthroat approach, and her apparent love of Blood Sport.

    Seems to me that GWB was elected in 2000 for 2 sterling qualities: (1) we knew little about him and so had little to despise, and (2) he was willing to be a barrom brawler, which US citizens always like in a leader.

    Obama gets the first quality and Hillary the second. Say what you will about her, she looks like she'll go to the mat in a brawl, and we imagine that this will be good for the USA , surrounded as we are by menacing enemies.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 21, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs