Israeli Foreign Ministry Humiliates Another Foreign Visitor

Author: SekharPublished: Nov 05, 2010 at 7:17 am 17 comments

Now it is the UK’s turn. Israel's foreign ministry has repeated its history of embarrassing ministers and officials visiting its country. The UK’s foreign secretary, William Hague, is on an official visit to Israel. He is also slated to visit the occupied territories. On the very first day of Mr. Hague’s visit, an Israeli foreign ministry spokesperson said Israel was postponing “strategic dialogue” with Britain. The UK and Israel have been conducting strategic dialogue over defense and security issues for several years.

This is not the first time Israel has humiliated visiting foreign officialsWillam Hague. Prominent examples in the recent past were the US’ Vice President Joe Biden’s visit in March 2010 and the summoning of Turkey’s envoy over a Turkish TV series. Both incidents caused major problems for Israel. Though an Israeli spokesperson denied that the latest development was a deliberate one, it said the same in Joe Biden’s issue. But so far, Britain's response has been too mild to mention.

Joe Biden’s Visit

In the second week of March when the Vice President of the US, Joe Biden, was going to visit Israel to bring momentum to indirect talks between Palestinians and Israelis, Israel announced the construction of 1,600 new homes in East Jerusalem, an occupied territory. The timing of that announcement called into question the very integrity of the US initiative on the Middle East peace process.

US President Barack Obama described the announcement that overshadowed Biden’s visit to Israel as destructive to peace talks and an “insult” to the US government. Israel’s ambassador to the US, Michael Oren, was summoned and reprimanded about the affair. Mr. Oren said then that Israel’s ties with the US were at their lowest and in the most serious crisis since 1975.

Turkey’s Envoy

Turkish envoy to Israel, Ahmet Celikkol, was summoned over a Turkish television series in October 2009 that showed Israeli security forces kidnapping Palestinian children and killing elders during the Gaza attack. The same was acknowledged by the UNHRC-commissioned Goldstone’s report on the Gaza attack. But Israel was infuriated over the television series and summoned the Turkish ambassador without informing him that he was to be reprimanded. Mr. Celikkol came to know about the reprimand only after arriving for the meeting and seeing the press and TV reporters.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2Page 3
Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for sekhar

Article Author: Sekhar

Though I'm an Engineering drop-out, I'm more concerned about politics for what and how they are. As Economics forms the basis of the politics my interest extended to Economics also. I've been writing in my mother tongue Telugu for last 15 years and in English for last 2 years.

Visit Sekhar's author pageSekhar's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Ruvy

    Nov 06, 2010 at 9:53 am

    This article is just tripe and garbage, Sekhar - filled with disingenuous refusals to link causes to action, and filled with self-righteous citations of illegal legislation.

    But, if in your eyes, Avigdor Liberman has humiliated the human trash that passes for Britain's foreign secretary, that is fine with me. The bum deserves humiliation.

  • 2 - Ruvy

    Nov 06, 2010 at 10:56 am

    For another point of view - one far more in line with reality than your delusional screed, try this Facebook link. It may not open for you.

  • 3 - Sekhar

    Nov 06, 2010 at 11:09 am

    #1 There you are, Ruvy!

    #2 It did not open as you said. Why to provide such link when you already know it would not open for me? Strange!

  • 4 - zingzing

    Nov 06, 2010 at 12:10 pm

    everyone, excepting israelis, and including half of them as well, is "human trash" in ruvy's eyes. but at least he recognize our humanity.

  • 5 - roger nowosielski

    Nov 06, 2010 at 12:14 pm

    Begrudgingly.

  • 6 - zingzing

    Nov 06, 2010 at 12:22 pm

    perhaps unwittingly.

  • 7 - Ruvy

    Nov 06, 2010 at 12:25 pm

    Sekhar, the link was to a conversation on FB about one of the more perfidious actions of the British - and more traitorous ones of the Israelis. I said it may not open because I was not sure it would, not because I was sure it wouldn't.

    British perfidy is never-ending, so it comes as no surprise. But the action of the Israeli government in allowing the Brits to get away with this perfidy is treasonous.

  • 8 - Ruvy

    Nov 06, 2010 at 12:27 pm

    @#5 - very begrudgingly.

  • 9 - Ruvy

    Nov 06, 2010 at 1:24 pm

    Finally, Sekhar, this article from Debkafiles takes the same facts you did, laid them out in PROPER order, and gave a clear accounting of what occurred. This is the clear linkages of events that you managed NOT to mention in your screed.

    He was informed that Israel had halted the strategic dialogue with the UK in protest against the failure of

    successive British governments to repeal a law allowing private individuals to file war crimes suits against foreign dignitaries.

    Since 2005, pro-Palestinian activists have used the concept of "universal jurisdiction" to threaten Israeli leaders with arrest for alleged war crimes. Several serving and former Israeli leaders have cancelled trips to Britain after being warned they could be arrested. The latest was Deputy Prime Minister Dan Meridor, who cancelled his trip to Britain last month to avoid prosecution for taking part in the government decision to intercept a Turkish vessel threatening to break Israel's blockade of Gaza. Nine Turks were killed resisting an Israeli army raid.

    "As long as they (Israeli delegates) can't come to Britain without fearing arrest, they won't come out," said Andy David, a Foreign Ministry spokesman. "The ball is in their (Britain's) court."

  • 10 - Sekhar

    Nov 06, 2010 at 5:06 pm

    #9 What you mentioned is already there in the link added in my article Ruvy. I didn't avoid it. I provided a link to it. I cannot reproduce everything you know. I would like to pick up those points so as to present my case without rupturing their context. I have provided some hints also about British governments' statements in my articles. Didn't I?

  • 11 - Sekhar

    Nov 07, 2010 at 12:54 am

    And, Ruvy, I want to remind you that it was the successive British governments that put forth the idea of creation of Israeli state since the start of 20th century, of course out of their own interests. A part of their interest may be to vacate Israelis living in the European countries in the name of creating a nation state of their own.

    The primary reason is to create a strategic hot spot amid oil rich Arab countries. British state's interests are one sided. But, Britishers are not. Several of them share genuine feelings of the oppressed people everywhere in the world, no matter what their race or nationality is.

    Ruvy, you must understand that there are several oppressed nations, races, religions and cultures in some form or other. At present, Israeli state is not an oppressed one but an oppressing state. It is oppressing genuine national aspirations of the Palestinians. Even Britain and the US that helped create Israel as part of their strategic interests in the region, are forced to acknowledge it, because it is a fact, whether one likes it or not. One has right to love his nation but has no right in any form to deny the rights of other nations.

    In one of your comments on one of my other articles you said Israelis had migrated from Egypt and conquered Israeli land. Shouldn't now the Israelis claim Egypt as their homeland and conquer it. Your state has piled up hundreds of nuclear war heads of course without admitting it and without allowing IAEA inspectors. They may help Israelis to conquer Egypt and form an ever greater Israel.

    And since Jordan river feeds the land of the other side, and Jordan river belongs to Israel (I don't know whether this is true but I strongly believe that theyre must be biblical writings on Jordan river which automatically suggest Jordan river is Israelis' own asset), why shouldn't other side of the Jordan river also become part of greater Israel?

    A philosopher said a true nationalist believes in respecting other nationalist feelings. A nationalist who begins to hate other nationalities, would soon begin to hate his own national people doubting their national respect or national origin on some pretext. Racial integrity and national aspirations are not a rock solid material that never changes. They continuously evolve towards better societies. Copy righted national sentiments may not help racial and national co-existences. Such sentiments are detrimental to the peaceful evolution of human civilizations.

  • 12 - Ruvy

    Nov 07, 2010 at 1:14 am

    Sekhar,

    I don't expect you to believe any pious words I might utter about "respecting other nationalities".

    But I am generally open when opportunities for peace seem to present their way. Witness this Facebook conversation between me and an Arab journalist, Mudar Zahran.

    Is there a road to peace between us? Is there a way we can make it happen?

    Ruvy:
    I would rather sit and have coffee or tea with my neighbors down the hill on Levona than have Border Guards destroy their homes and harass them - or have terrorists and European Jew-haters incite them to hate me and mine. Levona may be a good place to figure out how to make peace between our peoples.

    Mudar:
    Reuven,
    You have to understand, my people do not have enough political awareness, and the Arabs have been able to mislead them for long, as well as the Jew hating countries that are deemed super powers.
    Only solution is that my people return home....to Palestine (AKA Jordan)...any Palestinian homeland or state on Israeli soil will bring us more hate and trouble...I am being honest, my friend....open Jordan for them...and they will leave happily....and willingly.....never mind stuff like "we shall never leave blah blah blah"

    Ruvy:
    Mudar,
    Thank you for your honesty, sir. Rav Kahane, may his memory be for a blessing, and may his blood be avenged, said of you Arabs living in this country, "they must go". This never sat well with me. I have always believed that "good fences make good neighbors" and twenty years of living in the midwestern United States convinced me that this was so. You are telling me that I am wrong - and that Kahane was right. I would expect my neighbors, embittered of dealing with terrorism as they are, to say this. That you say this is quite unexpected.

    If you say this is the best solution for the Arabs in south Syria, then may they go with a blessing of peace upon them, and laden with riches, that they might build a prosperous home east of the Jordan, and that their children might grow up knowing peace, and seeking joy. May you see the day when you can return home in happiness in peace, looking upon each new day with the deep pleasure of having finally come home.

    May G-d allow us, in our humble and low states, to bring this about.

  • 13 - Sekhar

    Nov 07, 2010 at 5:18 am

    Ruvy, Are you suggesting Palestinians home land is Jordan, and they have to go Jordan instead of historical Palestine? Pardon me, I don't get it.

  • 14 - Ruvy

    Nov 07, 2010 at 9:04 am

    Sekhar, I'M suggesting nothing. MUDAR ZAHRAN is stating that his home Palestine, AKA Jordan, is where his people will be able to develop peacefully - separate and apart from the Jews, because they presently lack the political awareness to live together in peace with us. THAT IS HIS OPINION, AND THOSE ARE HIS WORDS. He is stating that Jews and Arabs cannot live together, and since the Arabs already have 77% of the original Palestine Mandate (which was exclusively for Jews in the first place), it is enough. We should keep Western Palestine, and they will keep Eastern Palestine. I'm citing this to you this way because it is HIS POINT OF VIEW, SPEAKING AS AN ARAB.

  • 15 - Ruvy

    Nov 07, 2010 at 9:11 am

    That is why I cited it at all. The point of my remarks was that Mudar Zahran did not believe Jews and Arabs could peacefully live together. He basically said what Rabbi Kahane had said - and it surprised me.

    But, to my regret, he is right. I posted this on Facebook a ½ hour ago.

    BREAKING NEWS!! A FIREBOMB WAS THROWN AT A PASSENGER BUS ON HIGHWAY 60 IMMEDIATELY BEFORE REACHING THE ENTRY ROAD LEADING INTO MA'ALE LEVONA. THIS OCCURRED AT APPROXIMATELY 18:15 HOURS ISRAEL WINTER TIME.

    This is reported from one of my sons, who was a passenger on the bus. A yellow light flared in front of the bus as an Arab vehicle passed it going the other way. The driver ordered the passengers off the bus, waited till the flare of the firebomb went out, and then when it went out, he ordered the passengers to return into the bus. The bus continued up the hill into Ma'ale Levona and the driver told the local security who called the army into the area. No one was hurt.

  • 16 - Ruvy

    Nov 07, 2010 at 9:22 am

    By the way, Sekhar, the historical Kingdom of David and Solomon, which determines what is called "historical Palestine" included most of Jordan, southern Lebanon and the Golan. That's "HISTORICAL Palestine".

  • 17 - Sekhar

    Nov 08, 2010 at 8:25 am

    I see. Thanks for the information Ruvy. You know, Ruvy, I'm learning from you what Jews feeling are on the conflict. I think you represent a section of the Jews, but not all, as I read from other sites run by Jews, like 'Tikun Olam'.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 21, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs