Soon after the Tsunami disaster hit, Jan Egeland, the UN's humanitarian chief called the US and other major western nations "stingy" for their low funding pledges towards disaster relief. While I think that whole incident was another example of the UN's bias, I'm wondering if perhaps the title of "stingy" is true in the way we are treating our troops and their families.
In late December, Senator Allen (R-VA) released a statement to the press calling upon the US government to raise what they call the "Death Benefit" for families of soldiers who die in combat from a miserly $12,000 to a more appropriate $100.000. I think Senator Allen sums up the situation perfectly:
"I think the people of a grateful nation want to be able to help the families who lose their sons or daughters in defense of our freedoms. The current amount of $12,000 is a miserly and paltry amount that I strongly believe should be much higher. I look forward to working with my colleagues on this important issue when the 109th Congress convenes in January," said Senator Allen.
Senator Allen is just now beginning an initiative to craft a bill to raise the death benefit to $100,000 and I think we need to voice our support for this effort in the loudest and clearest manner possible. If you aren't convinced regarding the need for this kind of change, let me point something out to you:
Before our troops went into Iraq and tore the Saddam regime to pieces, Mr. Hussein was giving the families of suicide bombers $25,000 every time one of their sons or daughters died committing an act of terrorism. So, Scum-of-the-Earth Saddam was giving more than TWICE AS MUCH to families of people who were targeting innocent women and children in suicide bombings as we are giving to the families of our troops who are even now sacrificing themselves to put an end to terrorism forever.