Is Iran Unstoppable? Part II - Page 2

Any or all of the SCO members (China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan) could enter the conflict in allegiance to Iran. This would bring possible involvement from U.S. allies (Azerbaijan, Georgia, Bulgaria, Romania, Japan, Israel and the U.K., although the latter two would quite possibly be involved in some capacity from the beginning). Such a catastrophic global conflict could become World War III.

Israel may not manage to pressure the U.S into regime change but could encourage a pre-emptive strike against the nuclear facilities only. If conventional weapons are used, Iran is likely to retaliate against Israel with missiles and may block the Strait of Hormuz, a vital oil channel. They had threatened this as a consequence of sanctions, now sanctions have been imposed it seems Iran has realized that blocking the Strait would only tighten the noose. Iran could also re-evaluate the consequences of a failed state in Iraq against a bloody defeat for the U.S in its neighboring country if Israel goes it alone, which would undoubtedly need a green light from the U.S in any case. It would be a definite if the U.S were involved in the strike.

The Sunday Times reported that Israel is planning an independent strike on Iran's nuclear facilities, many of which are underground, using nuclear bunker busting bombs. Israel has denied the report that brought retaliatory threats from Iran. If such a pre-emptive strike were mounted by Israel, the U.S. or both using tactical nuclear weapons, the world's fate will be in the hands of Russian and Chinese leaders and whether or not they decide to honor the SCO verbal military agreement and unleash any of their nuclear arsenals to retaliate on Iran's behalf.

Given such a possible chain reaction of unintended, but foreseeable consequences, I ask:

Wouldn't it be better to allow Iran to continue enriching, and instead apply the current amount of pressure on them to allow IAEA inspectors to roam freely around Iran, to make sure no enriched Uranium is diverted to the covert weapons program which the U.S is so sure exists?

Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for liam-bailey

Article Author: Liam Bailey

Liam Bailey is a writer with SEO copywriting services company Write About Property

Visit Liam Bailey's author pageLiam Bailey's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • Nuclear Power Is Not the Answer Nuclear Power Is Not the Answer

    The world-renowned antinuclear activist's myth-busting look at the real costs and consequences of nuclear energy."Dr. Caldicott is one of the most articulate and passionate advocates of citizen action ...

Article comments

  • 1 - Ariel

    Jan 14, 2007 at 12:17 pm

    No. It will be better to put GROUND FORCES in Iran for the soul purpose of dismantling, destroying, and confiscating whatever sites can't be bombed. You obviously have no fucking idea Mr. Bailey, how dangerous nuclear arms would be in the hands of these Islamic nazis. Inspections are worthless when a country has secret development going on. And, yes, in the sense that this regime calls for genocide (rarely even did Hitler do this explicity), that it is a NAZI like regime. All the fucking apologia in the world doesn't change this fact.

    "Wouldn't it be better to allow Iran to continue enriching, and instead apply the current amount of pressure on them to allow IAEA inspectors to roam freely around Iran, to make sure no enriched Uranium is diverted to the covert weapons program which the U.S is so sure exists?"

  • 2 - Alan

    Jan 14, 2007 at 7:28 pm

    Opening Salvos of a greater Middle East War - A war involving the US, Israel, Iran, Syria, Hezbollah and Al Qaeda...


  • 3 - Zedd

    Jan 15, 2007 at 2:27 pm

    Liam

    Perhaps I missed it in your previous entry, why can Iran NOT have nuclear capability?

  • 4 - ProfEssays

    Jan 17, 2007 at 7:03 am

    I repeat, the only solution to this problem is regular air strikes on Iran.

  • 5 - Daniel

    Jan 18, 2007 at 8:24 pm

    Let me assure you that I will bring Iran to it's knees and lower, I will make them slaves to the world, and I will make them an example of worthlessness among all mindkind.

    No one can change this, it is my choice and my choice alone, there is no reason no doubt, I do not answer any whys.

  • 6 - Cyrus the Great

    Jan 20, 2007 at 11:09 pm

    Who the hell are you Daniel? You are worse than any radical muslim. Your heros couldn't take care of 3K Lebanese militia and now you want to confront Iran. You talk like a stupid, spoiled and abused child. I bet you never ever have had a war experience. Otherwise you wouldn't advocate war so much. It seems southern Lebonon war defeat was not enough for you. Let me tell you something, if Israel hasn't attack Iran yet is because her leaders know about grave consequences. They never follow diplomacy or international law. Why the should do it this time. They say we are waiting for diplomacy to work. These are all BS. They were waiting for Arrow anti-ballistic missile system to be operational. But, what a waist. Before full deployment, Iran successfully test fired multiple war head version of S3. Read debka Daniel. Read articles from Uzi Robin. They are scared Daniel. THEY ARE SCARED. You better be scared. There is no winner in a war. Both sides will be loosers.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 27, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs