Iowa Straw Poll Results

The much-hyped Iowa Straw Poll finally took place tonight, and the results are in. As expected, Mitt Romney was the victor. Of course, with top-tier candidates like Rudy Giuliani, John McCain, and Fred Thompson refusing to participate, anything less than a solid first-place finish would have been devastating to the Romney candidacy.

Anyway, here are the complete results, along with my commentary:

1. Mitt Romney - 4516 votes - 31%

This is roughly the same percentage George W. Bush got in 1999. And we all know what happened after that: the momentum from his victory here helped secure Dubya's place as the front-runner for the GOP nomination, and he of course became the eventual nominee. The Romney camp is probably somewhat disappointed that they didn't get a higher percentage, but they still won by a comfortable margin. Romney has the "big-mo" now. Let's see if he can keep it.

2. Mike Huckabee - 2587 votes - 18.1%

This was somewhat surprising. Huckabee was expected to do relatively well here, but not to grab second-place, garnering nearly one-in-five votes cast. This result could easily propel the former Arkansas Governor to top-tier status among the GOP candidates. And he is certainly a credible candidate: over ten years experience as a Governor; he's a Southerner; he's somewhat telegenic, and a good speaker who gives off a positive vibe; he is an ordained Protestant Minister; and he has a great personal story, being born in Hope, Arkansas (sound familiar?) and losing over 100 pounds while becoming a major advocate for healthy living. Keep your eye on this guy.

3. Sam Brownback - 2192 votes - 15.3%

Yeah, you could say that it's a respectable third-place showing, but Brownback is done. Let's just take a look at the facts. He's from Kansas, which is practically on Iowa's border. He's probably the most socially-conservative candidate of the bunch (and social conservatives are a huge constituency in Iowa, especially at events like this that draw mostly activists). He's been visiting Iowa constantly for several months now, and he's been fund-raising for this campaign for almost a year (I should know - I've probably gotten a dozen pleas for cash from this guy since 2006). He even vastly outspent Huckabee here. And yet he still came in third (and not terribly far from fourth). Brownback will withdraw from the race sometime in the near future - mark my words.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2Page 3
Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for rj-elliott

Article Author: RJ Elliott

RJ is a graduate student at the University of Central Florida. His passions in life are sports, politics, nature, and women who have piercings they never told their daddy about. He dislikes daytime television, left-wing dictators, and people who talk like Garrison Keillor. …

Visit RJ Elliott's author pageRJ Elliott's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • The Iowa Precinct Caucuses: The Making of a Media Event The Iowa Precinct Caucuses: The Making of a Media Event

    This text explores the role of the media in the American electoral process, focusing on Iowa as a prism on the national scene. The author examines the beginning of the precinct caucuses and the events ...

Article comments

— go to most recent comments
  • 1 - Jason

    Aug 12, 2007 at 5:43 am

    I don't think you can draw the same parallels between Romney's win and Bush's. Bush got about 3000 more votes than Romney did (suggesting the Iowa Republicans are lukewarm about their choices), and that was with all the top-tier candidates in. Romney could only get 31% against a field made up mainly of the second- and third-tier candidates.

    He still may be able to spin this as a decisive win, but it puts a crimp in the aura of inevitability he's trying to establish, and I'd bet his campaign is privately concerned they couldn't crack 40% against this field.

    Agreed Tommy Thompson is done (his campaign says they're making an announcement in 48 hours, which sounds to me like they're making the arrangements to shut it down). Hunter is probably toast, as he's been running on immigration also only to see Tancredo obliterate him. Might still make it to the caucuses but no further.

    McCain doesn't just need a New Hampshire miracle, he almost needs a miracle in the next month or so just to show he's still viable.

  • 2 - Carson

    Aug 12, 2007 at 10:34 am

    I am proud to be an American when I see the way the straw poll seemed to cut through some of the hype created by the media in favor of the over financed candidates.

    Back about 1915 or so we had a politician named Woodrow Wilson that accepted a bribe to create the Federal Reserve. They were a group of very powerful bankers and businessmen from around the world at the time. Through the monopoly of being the source of our money and by being outside of our government, or paying any taxes, they have built up a fortune that, I believe, includes owning most of the politicians of the world.

    It is going to take a determined, We the People, to restore law and order in our government before we can restore law and order in our once great nation.



    "I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world. No longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men."

    -Woodrow Wilson

  • 3 - Heloise

    Aug 12, 2007 at 10:41 am

    Just check Heloise's checklist on "George and the GOP." It predicted and I have been predicting that Romney (with his 6 letters) would be the GOP nominee, rather than Guiliani (who is the national frontrunner). Also, my checklist ensured that the best looking candidate and the ones with the most checks would win the straw poll and the caucus, which may be in December.

  • 4 - ToughGuy

    Aug 12, 2007 at 12:06 pm

    "18.1% This was somewhat surprising. Huckabee was expected to do relatively well here, but not to grab second-place, garnering nearly one-in-five votes cast."

    18.1 is closer to "one in six" (18.1 - 16.67 = 1.43) than it is to "one in five" (20.0 - 18.1 = 1.9).

    I am smart, QED

  • 5 - Dave Nalle

    Aug 12, 2007 at 12:10 pm

    You guys seem to be forgetting that the straw poll means even less than the polls appearing in newspapers and on the cable news networks. I do think it's slightly more valid than internet polls, though.

    Dave

  • 6 - Luke

    Aug 12, 2007 at 12:49 pm

    It looks like time and endless ammounts of money really do pay off. I'm glad to hear Ron Paul got a decent percentage of the votes, given that he is the only Republican candidate out there who I'd even consider voting for.

  • 7 - Philip Blumel

    Aug 12, 2007 at 4:07 pm

    This is the best short analysis of the Straw Poll that I have seen. As you suggest, the real winners of this poll were Huckabee and Paul, no doubt about it. Romney showed he deserves to be considered top tier, but that is a status quo position. Huckabee and Paul moved up a notch or two or three.

  • 8 - Baronius

    Aug 12, 2007 at 4:18 pm

    Romney has got to feel good about these results. He passed the first real test, getting a group of people to vote for the Mormon for President. All the looks and buzz don't matter if people won't vote for you. Apparently, they'll vote for Romney.

    Huckabee's second place looks good, until you look at the gang of misfits he beat. I mean, really, do you walk away from a victory over Tancredo feeling presidential? But I like the advice to "keep your eye on this guy". He's positioned himself to make the jump into the first tier.

    I don't see McCain dropping out any time soon. He's the Republican Obama, with national press sending him flowers and love poems every day. He can get more camera time without money than the other candidates could buy.

  • 9 - Egbert Sousé

    Aug 12, 2007 at 4:28 pm

    "This is roughly the same percentage George W. Bush got in 1999. And we all know what happened after that:"

    Is the answer "worst president ever"?

    I have to agree that the win isn't that impressive, but we'll have to see how it gets spun. I am surprised Newt didn't get any, and I don't think Paul is going to get any network TV time.

  • 10 - gonzo marx

    Aug 12, 2007 at 4:58 pm

    a few things...

    the turn out of people for the straw poll was less than half of what it was in 99 for the 00 race...this would tend to indicate much less motivation on the part of Iowa caucus goers

    the straw poll costs $35 per head to vote in, and campaigns routinely pay the fee to get votes...added to that the "paid" volunteers and the buses paid by the campaign and the Romney votes don't look anywhere near as promising as some would like to trumpet...

    it should show Tommy Thompson, Tancredo, Duncan Hunter and Cox that it's time for them to bow out...we will see if ego allows it before more good money is thrown after bad...

    just some Thoughts...

    Excelsior?

  • 11 - RJ

    Aug 12, 2007 at 5:59 pm

    "the turn out of people for the straw poll was less than half of what it was in 99 for the 00 race"

    In 1999, 23,685 people voted in the Iowa Straw Poll (a record high). Last night, 14,302 people voted in the Iowa Straw Poll. 14,302 is indeed less than 23,685, but it is not "less than half" - it's closer to 60%.

    SOURCE

    "it should show Tommy Thompson, Tancredo, Duncan Hunter and Cox that it's time for them to bow out"

    Thompson, yes. Hunter, probably. And Cox shouldn't even be running.

    But why should Tancredo drop out at this point? Fourth place and almost 14% of the vote in a contest very far away from his home state is quite an impressive showing. Especially for a guy who was polling about 1-2% nationally, and was given almost no media coverage outside of talk radio, except for the occasion passing mention of him in the MSM as a "controversial far-right one-issue long-shot candidate with a divisive political agenda" or words to that effect...

  • 12 - Lee Richards

    Aug 12, 2007 at 8:22 pm

    Re #2:

    Carson:

    What is your source for stating that Wilson accepted a bribe to create the Federal Reserve?

    Was Congress bribed too?

    What bankers and businessmen were involved?

  • 13 - Dave Nalle

    Aug 12, 2007 at 9:29 pm

    Perhaps he thinks that when Jay Gould gave the government a $64 million no-interest loan to cover the budget deficit that was some sort of bribe.

    I'd also like to see a source for that quote from Wilson. It sounds extremely atypical.

    Dave

  • 14 - Dave Nalle

    Aug 12, 2007 at 9:33 pm

    It only took a tiny bit of research. The quote is spurious. Part of it is something Wilson actually said but the first two sentences are fraudulent. He was not, in fact, talking about the federal reserve, but about the oligarchic character of government in general.

    For some explanation of the bogus quote see WikiQuote.

    Dave

  • 15 - RJ

    Aug 12, 2007 at 11:22 pm

    Tommy Thompson is finished (as I predicted).

  • 16 - gonzo marx

    Aug 12, 2007 at 11:37 pm

    for RJ in #11 - my bad, i had thought it was closer to 30k in '99, from an MSNBC report...

    but still...little more than half by your numbers...and the top 3 Contenders did not contest the field, whereas in '99 only one was missing...if Memory serves

    from what i heard on Meet the Press, Huckabee is the surprise of the day, getting more Votes than tickets he paid for, running no ads in Iowa, with one negative ad ran against him by the Family Council...that's impressive and would make one wonder if he didn't do really well in the last debate among some mid-western voters...will be interesting to see how his national numbers do in a week or three

    for Tancredo...poor showing in a place he really needed to hit 20% or better on in order to even dream of getting some $$$ rolling into the campaign...if he doesn't pull 2nd or third in both Iowa and NH he's a lost Cause(i think he is anyway)

    just the way i See it right now

    (for RJ - great Anecdote!)

    Excelsior?

  • 17 - Clavos

    Aug 12, 2007 at 11:40 pm

    "for Tancredo...poor showing in a place he really needed to hit 20% or better on in order to even dream of getting some $$$ rolling into the campaign...if he doesn't pull 2nd or third in both Iowa and NH he's a lost Cause(i think he is anyway)"

    As well he should be, bigoted SOB that he is.

  • 18 - gonzo marx

    Aug 12, 2007 at 11:47 pm

    lol...now now, Clavos..don't hold back, tell us how you really feel about him...

    i'm not making Value judgments about any of the Candidates at this point...just keeping an Eye on the rat races...

    Huckabee is a tough call, he didn't hit that 20% number either, but he came damn close with very little investment...like i said, watch this guys numbers in the next month or two...he pulls an actual second place in the real Caucus, the top tier should be pooping cinder blocks...

    Excelsior?

  • 19 - Dave Nalle

    Aug 12, 2007 at 11:51 pm

    You know, Huckabee is very personable and has some interesting, moderate ideas. What bugs me about him is that he seems to be so religiously extreme. Wasn't he one of the three who raised their hands in favor of creationism?

    But I'm with Clavos on Tancredo. Despite very good positions on taxes and social security and other issues, he's both a racist fool and a fortress america ubersecurity nut.

    Dave

  • 20 - RJ

    Aug 13, 2007 at 12:06 am

    Epic link, gonzo. Thanks. :)

  • 21 - gonzo marx

    Aug 13, 2007 at 12:11 am

    (was that the BEST Lone Ranger story in my link, or what?)

    heh...

    Excelsior?

  • 22 - RJ

    Aug 13, 2007 at 12:35 am

    "What bugs me about him is that he seems to be so religiously extreme."

    I don't know that he's "extreme" in his religion, but he is an ordained minister, so I believe it's reasonable to expect him to talk quite a bit about God and religion.

  • 23 - Clavos

    Aug 13, 2007 at 12:37 am

    Mos' scocious link, gonz!!

    (Would have loved to have seen that guy's face when the LR came out of the car!)

  • 24 - Dave Nalle

    Aug 13, 2007 at 2:05 am

    I don't know that he's "extreme" in his religion, but he is an ordained minister, so I believe it's reasonable to expect him to talk quite a bit about God and religion.

    RJ, that's really not what I'm looking for in a president.

    Dave

  • 25 - Nancy

    Aug 13, 2007 at 1:40 pm

    Romney's spin is that the leading candidates who didn't deign to compete didn't do so because they took one look at his various "platforms" (?) and were SOOOO intimidated they decided not to run against him. !?!?!?! Now THAT is hubris.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 09, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs