And now the deliberate intransigence and intolerance by the Republican Party leadership is tearing at the party from within, as this recent article by longtime Blogcritics resident and leader of the Republican Liberty Caucus Dave Nalle clearly shows. On the orders of the Republican Party elite, "bipartisanship," "negotiation," and "moderate" have become terms of shame and scorn among conservatives. If the Republicans lose in the upcoming November elections, it seems that their reaction will be anything but realization that they need to change their message and return to being a "big tent" party; instead, it's much more likely that they will demand ever more conservative policies from their politicians, never mind that their current positions are much further to the right than the Republicans would have tolerated (much less supported) during the Reagan era.
Indeed, any careful analysis of the fiscal policies supported by the current Republican presidential ticket will reveal that they not only largely support the same policies that nearly drove America off the fiscal cliff under George W. Bush, but do so to an even greater extent: larger tax cuts for the wealthy and the corporate elite, larger spending cuts to everything but Medicare and Defense, and yet more deregulation of Wall Street. Bush's policies nearly brought America and the world into another depression, yet Romney wants those same polices, but even more so? To make matters worse, the foreign policy positions of both Romney and Ryan are closely aligned with those of George W. Bush. And where did that get us? Afghanistan and Iraq.
Yet the Republicans don't really have a choice, do they? They've painted themselves into a rhetorical corner by deciding to oppose whatever the Democrats want, regardless of whether the Democrats want what the Republicans have supported in the past. That means that if the Democrats want to do something that is good for America, the Republicans force themselves to vehemently oppose it, and instead wind up supporting positions that are not popular and have brought nothing but fiscal and social disaster in the past. But what else can they do? They can't allow themselves to work with the Democrats, the very suggestion of which is strictly forbidden.
Article comments
1 - John Lake
The Republican hypocrisy is becoming more apparent daily. How can intelligent men let themselves be led in such mindless fashion? And the obstruction, which they seem to feel is invisible to the average voter, rose from of an election that was founded on bilateral promises to “reach across the aisle.”
2 - Igor
IMO, John, the republicans have become shameless in their pursuit of a "Rule or Ruin" policy. They are willing to risk the ruin of the USA to gain rule.
3 - John Lake
Shameless. Exactly.
4 - Big T.
The House has passed many bills, but the Senat (Run by Democrat Harry Reid) won't even bring it up for a vote or even discuss the issues.So it's both sides not cooperating, not just the Republicans.
5 - Igor
T: the only bills passed in the Republican house are totally partisan. There's no hope of them passing, they're just fakes to fool the easily deceived, as you appear to be.
6 - Glenn Contrarian
There was a bill recently stopped in the Senate - IIRC, it was for hiring more teachers and emergency responders nationwide, but the Republicans filibustered it because Harry Reid wouldn't let them put in a rider on the bill that would completely defund Obamacare.
Looks like "Big T" has no clue as to what the Republicans in Congress are doing.
7 - Peggy
I hope he win with much joy especially dealing racist people in this country .,
8 - Not the liberal actor
Glenn, I must again ask if you are "for real?"
First, you refer to Rush Limbaugh's "I hope he fails" statement, and the media firestrorm that remark created. Have you EVER listened to Rusah Limbaugh? If so, you would know that Limbaugh was referring to his POLICIES rather than (as the MSM portrayed it) a personal reference. Unfortunately, Obama did not fail, as the deficit increase, green energy cronism, Obamacare, unemployment, foodstamps, ...., attest.
Second, may I remind you that from January 2009, until November 2010, Democrats controlled both houses of Congress, and Obama had a filibuster-proof Congress. Perhaps those "wasklly Wepublicans" are trying to stop Obama's policies.
9 - Glenn Contrarian
Warren -
Have you EVER listened to Rusah Limbaugh?
Yes I did, back in the day when I was a conservative very much like you. And if you'll read the rest of the article, you'll see how the GOP put party above country. But that's all just fact and history, and as such has no bearing on your opinion.
10 - Not the liberal actor
Re: comment # 9, Glenn, you say, "... the GOP put party above country." I disagree with that statement. The GOP is trying to stop Obama's POLICIES, thus putting country first. If, as you suggest, the GOP put party first, how did they do so well in November 10?
And I can't help but notice that you pick and choose what history to observe, while ignoring other history, such as the period from January 09 through November 10.
11 - Glenn Contrarian
Warren -
You still haven't read the article, much less checked the links therein where you will find that the Republicans filibustered bills that they themselves co-sponsored, just to keep Obama from accomplishing anything. Now are you going to tell me that the bills they co-sponsored were actually Obama's policies, that they weren't (in Republican eyes) good for America? No? Then WHY did they filibuster them?
Hm?
The answer lay in the quotes contained in the article, in the links where you can find where the Republicans themselves stated that they were not going to be bipartisan AT ALL. NOT AT ALL.
Reagan would be ashamed of today's GOP. He used to claim that he didn't leave the Democratic Party, but the Democratic Party left him. Now, so has the GOP.
12 - tdawg
the only thing I noticed that past legistlature w/ lightning speed was there pay raise
13 - Igor
That was sudden, wasn't it? Congresscritters are not happy to receive the no-payraise bite that they think their constituents should put up with.