How to Read Unemployment Numbers Correctly!

There is one simple fact. Most journalists know very little about economics. Let us talk about the unemployment numbers. Have jobs been lost over the past four years or not? Here are the facts. Since Bush has been elected, payroll jobs have been reduced but overall employment has increased! How is that you say? Simple, the government keeps separate books. First, they measure payroll numbers. These are figures that come from businesses. When you throw in the recession, high-energy cost and 9/11, most businesses failed to hire in the first two years of the Bush administration. The Department of Labor also conducts household surveys. This data is used to produce the unemployment rate that we are all familiar with and this figure has shown net gains in overall employment since the Bush years.

So what does a voter do when presented with conflicting data? The payroll is a good judge on corporate thinking but the household survey is a much more accurate and broader gauge of unemployment. What we are seeing is an economy in transition as many individuals are working for smaller firms or becoming self-employed. Many of these employees do not get counted immediately in the payroll surveys. In an economy that grows and changes, this is not unusual. This is part of the creative destruction of free market economics that sees some industries decline or die whereas others rise to prominence.

The media has shown to emphasize the payroll numbers but often failed to discuss the broader household numbers. Why? Good question. In some cases, I suspect simple ideology. Lou Dobbs of CNN has been a critic of free trade over the past several years and his use of the payroll numbers is done for one reason. To make the economy look worse than it is and make his arguments appear better. Democrats like John Kerry use payroll numbers because it makes their case that a change is needed. It is better to say that your opponent policies have led to job losses as oppose to admitting that your opponent policies have produce new job gains. The rest of media does so because either because of ignorance or bias against the incumbent.

So what does the real data show? Counting the recession of 2001 and 9/11, American corporations have sliced 585,00 jobs since Bush took office. However, nearly two million more Americans have found jobs and more Americans are working than ever before since Bush took his oath of office! One number shows a decline in jobs and another shows an increase. Considering that many self-employed are not counted in the payroll data, the number to consider is the household survey. That is the number that the unemployment rate is based on. Since the end of the recession, corporations have added nearly 1- 1.5 million workers to their payroll and the household surveys have shown that more than 3.4 millions Americans have gone to work since the recession end. Those are the facts.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - Eric Olsen

    Oct 12, 2004 at 1:09 pm

    excellent, informative and very interesting Tom, thanks!

  • 2 - bob2112

    Oct 12, 2004 at 3:51 pm

    Tom,
    'Jounalists' don't have time to explain the complexities of unemployment numbers, in what little time the politically-driven moment the 'news' wishes to report. Just make sure you remember whatever the %rate is, it's not counting the "out of work" who are not claiming benefits(exahusted, no extensions) & cannot find a real job. The job market is not like it used to be. In the 90's jobs needed bodies to fill plentiful positions. Today plenty of job openings with low balling, over-qualified applicants overwhelming HR departments, only hiring the presently employed. You can step on me all you want, but obviously, Tom, with the exception you have taken by inaccurate journalism, you are not looking for a job. As an unemployed, stay-home dad, when I see 5.4 national UR, you don't see the potentally 10%(or more) common folk working under the table; being incarcerated out of desparation; giving up after valiant attempt the last 3 years; or many off the grid, plotting something drastic.(no matter who wins November 2nd)

  • 3 - Eric Olsen

    Oct 12, 2004 at 6:09 pm

    being out of work involuntarily always sucks - my wife was for a year and a half - all you can do is keep trying - best of luck to you, Bob

  • 4 - bob2112

    Oct 12, 2004 at 7:03 pm

    I was fired into this lousy job market, not laid off. I think it makes it harder to get a job right now. People think, "Where's this guy been for a year & a half? Jail?" "Fired? Probably for good reason." Companies get so many applications for one opening, they have to divise a process of elimination. I'll take all the luck I can get. Thanks, Tom.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Dec 01, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs