House of Representatives Passes the Indo-US Nuclear Co-operation Bill but Concerns Remain

Author: APOLLOPublished: Jul 27, 2006 at 5:05 pm 3 comments

The US House of Representatives passed the 'United States and India Nuclear Cooperation Promotion Act' on July 26th 2006. This Act is also called as House Resolution 5682.

The proceedings began with the tabling of House Resolution 947, which sought for consideration of HR5682. When this was put to vote it passed with a margin of 311-112 with 9 abstentions. Of this Republicans voted for by a margin 224-1 and Democrats voted against the motion by 87-110.

This set the tone for the whole session with Democrat support for the bill lagging well behind the Republican, raising questions over whether the said Bill is really a bi-partisan effort after all.

Four important amendments and one motion to the Bill were introduced. Two were passed and two other amendments and the motion which were termed as "deal breakers" were defeated.

The First amendment was introduced by Representative Cliff Stearns (R-FL). It was "to reinforce the intent of the congress that the Nuclear Cooperation into which the two governments would enter is for peaceful, productive purposes, and not military". This amendment passed by a voice vote and was later confirmed with a recorded vote which was unanimous 414-0. 219 Republicans and 194 democrats voted in favour while 11 Republicans and 7 Democrats abstained.

The Second amendment was introduced by Representative Brad Sherman (DCA). It said "before any nuclear cooperation with India can go forward, and every year thereafter, the President must certify that during the preceding year India has not increased the level of domestic uranium it sends through its weapons program". This was one of the "deal breaker" amendments which had been voted down before in the House International Relations committee(HIRC). It was voted down again in a voice vote and a later recorded vote with a margin of 268-155. Again with more republicans than democrats voting against it. 201 Republicans and 67 democrats voted against. While 25 republicans and 129 Democrats voted for this "deal breaker" amendment.

The Third amendment was moved by Representative Howard Berman (D-CA). It required that the House vote 'to restrict exports of uranium and other types of nuclear reactor fuel (defined as 'source material' and 'special nuclear material' in the Atomic Energy Act of 1954) to India until the President determines that India has halted the production of fissile material (that is, plutonium and highly enriched uranium) for use in nuclear weapons'.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for apollo

Article Author: APOLLO

I live in Bangalore, the IT capital of India among some of the worst traffic offenders in the world. When i’am not caught in the middle of a traffic jam or writing some code for my company or trekking or partying, u can find me goofing off on the …

Visit APOLLO's author pageAPOLLO's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - Aaman

    Jul 27, 2006 at 11:17 pm

    Apollo, please do cross-post this over to DC

  • 2 - Apollo

    Jul 27, 2006 at 11:35 pm

    Aaman, i have done that already. i posted on both sites and my blog simultaneously.

  • 3 - Sandeep

    Nov 17, 2006 at 3:41 am

    I want to read the contents of the Bill. Can someone get me a link? Not able to search through Google ... getting mostly news results.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Dec 01, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs