I grew up learning about religious wars in history. The horrors of the crusades, the holocaust, all seemed too far in the past to touch my life. Thank god my generation seemed to be so much more focused on the important things in life, like happiness and family, or even money. But George Santayana had it all wrong, simply learning history won't necessarily protect you from repeating it, and here we are, in the midst of one of the biggest religious wars in the history of man.
The similarities between the world's attitude regarding the atrocities of Hitler and those of Hussein are remarkable. The backlash the government faced during that time from some of the citizenry of the U.S. as well as public opinion abroad so closely matches our world in 2004 that it's almost scary. The 9/11 commission, the Pearl Harbor panel, the accusations that were floated that Roosevelt didn't do enough to stop Pearl Harbor from happening (there were warning signs of an impending attack from Japan). High ranking government officials like Joeseph Kennedy felt that we shouldn't have gotten involved in WWII in the first place. Others, citing the atrocities of the holocaust, argued that we didn't do enough to stop the Nazi's from their crusade of violence. And didn't we tacitly support Hitler during his early days? Now we want to go to war to take him out? How dare we change our minds like that? Does any of this sound familiar?
As a nation, as a people, we haven't grown. Our political system is mired in partisan debates that boil down to who may gain a majority advantage come the next election. Rather than focus entirely on what's right, we respond with emotion and fear, finger pointing and unaccountability. We are faced with a greater threat than we've faced in half a century. Our entire system of freedoms is under review. Yet we pay more attention to a whistleblower's book than we do to the problem itself.
Taking bi-partisan politics and emotional hatred for the Bush administration out of the picture, the majority of Americans agree that Saddam Hussein should have been removed from power a long time ago. The majority agrees that we need to win the war against Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda. The majority feels that the best way to fight terrorism is through the establishment of real democracy in the Middle East. The differences between our highly split electorate boil down to whether we've conformed to international policy when waging war, or whether we can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that every single reason to go to war has been vindicated.
.jpg?t=20120527181101)





Article comments
1 - Eric Olsen
James, very sensible and I agree entirely with your conclusion. Thanks!
2 - Tom Johnson
I think it it totally cool that this article, titled "History Repeats," is repeated twice in the Etc. column. That's the universe stepping in to provide a little unprovoked humor.
(And this comment will look really pointless when the repeat-post is eventually removed in the future . . . but I just had to do it.)
3 - Tom Johnson
Dang, see? It's already gone. Nevermind then.
4 - Eric Olsen
We must cling to our unintentional humor where we find it.
5 - James Golden
It's ok Tom, this little bit of humor will just have to be enjoyed by you, Eric and I only. :>
6 - kuros
just a reminder:
"Beyond the Euphrates began for us the land of mirage and danger, the sands where one helplessly sank, and the roads which ended in nothing. The slightest reversal would have resulted in a jolt to our prestige giving rise to all kinds of catastrophe; the problem was not only to conquer but to conquer again and again, perpetually; our forces would be drained off in the attempt."
Emperor Hadrian AD 117-138