On July Fourth of 2010 on ABC's "This Week" Sunday morning news program, Cynthia Tucker formerly of the "Atlanta-Journal Constitution" said (and I paraphrase her here 'cause I can't quote anyone to save my life): "Michael Steele is a Republican, affirmative-action failure."
I tend to agree with her — most, well, make that almost affirmatively.
But the fundamental difference between her and I, and I do fundamentally differ with her as to the basic, intellectual, polemical and philosophic roots of this issue, is that I admit and recognize that unpleasant reality (Steele). In fact I am one of many conservative voices who has called for and demanded the voluntary resignation of Michael Steele as the chairman of the RNC, or put more bluntly, I am one who who quite openly has clamored for both his voluntary or involuntary, if necessary, dismissal.
(Now for those of you with a typical, liberal, governmental, statist and collectivist, and intellectually, academically and scholastically worthless and substandard, as well as stultifying, ignorance-inducing, mind-numbing, zombified, brainwashed, propagandized, uncritical, unanalytical, mindless public-school education; the latter is simply a fancy way of saying "fired" and or "canned" as in "shit-canned.")
However the difference between us doesn't stop there. If Michael Steele, whom I, believe it or not, like and admire greatly, is indeed an affirmative-action failure, and a colossal one at that; then what pray tell is President Obama?
If the former (Steele) is a failure then is the latter (President Obama) likewise an even greater and even more colossal failure? Indeed, perhaps the worst politically-correct, affirmative-action failure in American history!
Moreover, as is so typical of the American liberal-left, Ms. Tucker, when it comes to blindly supporting, promoting and defending President Obama, again as is so very typical of her ilk, both white and black; is essentially a Stalinist-apologist which condition is again so very emblematic and prevalent amongst today's liberals qua liberal progressives qua liberal socialists qua socialists qua communists qua Marxists qua Neo-Marxists and other assorted "commie-lib" qua "lefty, pinko" lunatics and leftist true-believer fanatics.
Again, for those of you with a worthless, substandard, liberal, public-school education and therefore are quite ignorant, gullible and stupid; allow me to express this in very simple and easily understandable, direct terms: To call someone a Stalinist-apologist is essentially to describe that sort of true-believer fanatic who never, never admits his or her guy is mistaken or flat-out wrong or let us say, ethically challenged, that is to say, immoral and even downright evil. No, as in never, never, never! What it essentially is saying, is "my guy right or wrong" and that I will not be swayed by any facts and evidence to the contrary, no matter how incontrovertible and ironclad that evidence and those facts are. Again, as in never, never, never!