Gay Rights and the Line Between Activism and Terrorism

Where do we draw the line between activism and terrorism? Events this past Sunday in Lansing, Michigan brought this question to mind, as gay activists from the group BashBack! staged a protest at a church service which was deliberately designed to look and feel a lot like a terrorist attack.

Mount Hope Church is a fairly typical evangelical megachurch with lots of money and huge facilities and a large congregation. Based on their website, their most radical program appears to be a support group for men who are addicted to pornography, but according to BashBack! they are trying to:

"institutionalize transphobia and homophobia through several repulsive projects including organized 'ex-gay' conferences and so-called 'hell houses', which depict queers, trannies and womyn who seek abortions as the horrors. Mt. Hope is complicit in the repression of queers in Michigan and beyond."
These are all activities which radical Christian churches are known for sponsoring, so the accusations are believable, though some of the rhetoric is a bit over-the-top, such as the declaration that "So long as bigots kill us in the streets, this pack of wolves will continue to BASH BACK!" I'm fairly confident that even Mount Hope Church draws the line well before actually killing their gay neighbors in the streets.

During the noon service on Sunday the 9th, a protest was staged outside Mt. Hope Church by black garbed and pink-scarved gay-anarchist activists. While that distracted the security guards, about 40 minutes into the service protesters inside the church who were dressed more normally stood up and began throwing pink confetti, glitter, condoms, and fliers, shouting out slogans like "Jesus was Gay" and rushing the pulpit where they began kissing and making out in front of the congregation. Meanwhile one of the group pulled the fire alarm and several members draped the balcony behind the altar with a sign reading "IT'S OKAY TO BE GAY! BASH BACK!" These activities lasted for less than 20 minutes before most of the protesters fled the church and drove away.

Accounts from both sides agree that the congregation and church staff were stunned into inaction by the demonstration, mostly standing and observing in shock and horror. The BashBack! activists got away before the police could even be called and the service carried on after they were gone. According to some accounts one woman in the congregation had an extreme reaction, shouted that Satan was in the church and fell down and began speaking in tongues. In an impromptu sermon the pastor asked members of the congregation to pray for the protesters. Although the protesters had video cameras no video of the event has been released.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for dave-nalle

Article Author: Dave Nalle

Dave Nalle has been a magazine editor, freelance writer, capitol hill staffer, game designer and taught college history for many years. He is Chairman of the Republican Liberty Caucus, working to promote liberty in the GOP. …

Visit Dave Nalle's author pageDave Nalle's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

— go to most recent comments
  • 1 - John Galt

    Nov 13, 2008 at 1:40 am

    These activists would not dare to attempt the same protest at an Islamic mosque. Islam demands the death sentence for homosexuality. Also, 70% of African Americans voted for California prop 8. If they attempted the same protest at a Black Theology church, the brothers would put a cap in their a**.

  • 2 - Dave Nalle

    Nov 13, 2008 at 1:58 am

    Crudely put, but it's hard to argue with you, JG.

    The fact is that our society is far more tolerant of homosexuality than many others in the world, but that does not mean that we should also be tolerant of bigotry, which really is inexcusable.

    Dave

  • 3 - Jet

    Nov 13, 2008 at 2:14 am

    Dave, like the woman with the "backwards B" carved but not carved on her cheek in Pittsburgh, this had all the earmarks of something that was staged by the church itself to get the local community digusted with the evil amongst them.

    As much as a lot of people would like to believe it, the gay community at large isn't prone to shooting itself in the foot-so to speak.

    Anyone with any intelligence at all would know that in the long and short term this could only severely damage community relations in a time when that'd be the last thing we'd do in order to gain respect of our peers.

    Of course that's only my opinion

  • 4 - Jet

    Nov 13, 2008 at 2:32 am

    I mean think about it Dave; if you were to "stage" such an event, and all you knew about faggots was what you were taught in church in hushed voices, would you

    A. Follow the lead of the west coast protests that were calm civilized people dressed in casual everyday "normal" clothes carrying picket signs and chanting slogans.

    or

    B. Dressed stereotypically in what the church wants you to believe about all pervert homosexuals-in other words in pink makeup and scarves, (looking like they were dressed by of all things queer arab terrorists) mincing around throwing fairy dust with limp wrists and squealing at the least provocation?

    By the way, They even got the color wrong-The gay color is Lavender because it a mixture of equal parts pink and blue (sortove a light purple)

  • 5 - Jet

    Nov 13, 2008 at 3:01 am

    After doing some quick googling Dave, I admit I was wrong about the church staging the event. I'm still suspicious of the BashBack organization, as it seemingly/intentionally is an embarrassment to the gay community at large.

    Most of us gay people are extreemly embarrased when we hold an event, because the news media tend to concentrate on the over-makeuped drag queens and the mincing lisping fairies, to the point where (myself included unfortunately) have become prejudiced against those segments of our numbers that tend to drag us back two steps in the public's eyes for every one we take forward.

    99.9 percent of gays blend into the general population to the point of being invisible, which scares fundamentalist even more because they can't point out "god's enemy", so they try to convince people that all gays are drag queens etc.

    Quoted from new articles...

    While Alliance of LGBT Students disagrees with Mount Hope's hurtful stance that homosexuality and transgenderism are sins, we categorically condemn the actions of BashBack! which not only disrespected the congregation, broke the law and put people in physical danger, but are also not beneficial to the LGBT movement," said Michigan State University Alliance Program Director Justin Lippi.

    Metropolitan Community Church Rev. Mark Bidwell agreed. "While I don't agree with what that church teaches or preaches, they are still a church and I have to have a respect for that," he said of the protest. "What I'd rather see happen is to be able to go and talk to the pastors of that church, talk to the congregation in a peaceful way and let them know that all we're seeking are the basic rights we should be entitled to."

    Rev. Bidwell pointed out that though their actions remained mostly non-violent, they caused chaos that could have led to injury. "Some of the things they have done, like pulling the fire alarm - people could have been hurt," he chastised. "I think the fact that they could have stood there inside the church - maybe in silence - could have meant as much than some of the actions that they took."

    Bash Back! has been known to speak out against peaceful gay activists, claiming that their actions are conforming to a hetero-normative society.

    To Rev. Bidwell and others, the actions of Bash Back! are harmful to the LGBT community, fueling the fears that many anti-gay believers already have about gays and lesbians. "I believe in the peaceful protest," he said. "I believe in what Martin Luther King and Ghandi and Jesus taught us that to use violence any time, I think, is wrong. To destroy property any time is wrong. The idea that this reflects on our community can be harmful for us because all that does is it makes people more afraid."

  • 6 - J.C.

    Nov 13, 2008 at 3:58 am

    The deplorable methods of Bash Back were way out of line, but to refer to them as "terrorists" is absolutely absurd. Timothy McVeigh didn't blow up part of a building with pamphlets, nor did the Twin Towers Fall because someone ran inside and started yelling. Maybe when al Quaeda decides to release a new field manual entitled "Death to America the Easy Way: Using Fire Alarms and Condoms", I suppose the soldiers in Afghanistan will be shaking in their boots, right?

  • 7 - Jet

    Nov 13, 2008 at 4:03 am

    I said they were dressed LIKE arab terrorists, not that they were terrorests.

  • 8 - Dave Nalle

    Nov 13, 2008 at 4:15 am

    Glad you looked into it, Jet. I did include a link to their own press release on their website, which should have given you a hint that BashBack! is very much for real.

    Your last comments fit with exactly what I'm concerned about. Well, I'm not so bothered by the flamboyantly gay making all gay people look silly - that's a different issue. But what does concern me is when people resort to threats and violence in defense of a good cause. Doing so diminishes that cause and can negate the efforts of all of those who are working by more reasonable means to accomplish that same goal.

    That's the problem I see here. These folks at BashBack! are picking up the tactics of the anarchist dickheads who tried to start riots and bombing at the Republican Convention earlier this year and it's not doing any good for them or their cause.

    Dave

  • 9 - Dave Nalle

    Nov 13, 2008 at 4:17 am

    J.C. No one is really going to compare these BasBack! activists to real terrorists. The problem is that they themselves are making that comparison by dressing as shown in the photo accompanying the article, which originates on their website.

    They are also using tactics designed to terrorize and intimidate those they don't agree with, even if no violence is committed by them.

    And as I pointed out in the article, dressed as they are and acting as they were, they are lucky they weren't mistaken for terrorists by an overzealous cop or security guard and shot.

    All of this is why I think it's troubling to blur the line between activism and terrorism.

    Dave

  • 10 - Jet

    Nov 13, 2008 at 4:29 am

    As an out and (probably too) proud gay man it's very troubling to me to think that I'm prejudiced against those of my kind "so to speak".

    I think of it like that no good fuckin' &%^$*@@# traitor Joe Lieberman who when out campaigning with McCain. We have to kiss his ass, and tread lightly because we need his caucus votes with us dems in case we need him for that magical number of 60... But if we can do without it or him another way, we'd boot the damned turn-coat out of our party in a heartbeat.

    Why; because he's giving us a bad name. Just like these assholes BashBack are an embarrassment to gays in general.

    You can almost hear the preachers grinning and pointing at the TV screen saying "See? What'd I tell you? Haven't I been warning you they're all like that all along?"

    I have the same reaction when I notice the only thing a local TV news show is stock footage of drag queens when doing a story about gays, as I did every time I saw Lieberman standing behind McCain during his speaches...

    Disgust

    God that hurt...

  • 11 - Ruvy

    Nov 13, 2008 at 4:35 am

    Jet,

    I think of it like that no good fuckin' &%^$*@@# traitor Joe Lieberman who when out campaigning with McCain.

    I know why Joe Lieberman is not my favorite fellow. But what have you against him? Just curious....

  • 12 - Jet

    Nov 13, 2008 at 4:43 am

    He was a democrat, who turn-coated on his own party and became an Independant, then spit in our face by campaigning for McDain... a republican.

    Joe Lieberman was also the 2000 vice presidential candidate with Al Gore, and we pinned a lot of hopes on him.

  • 13 - Doug Hunter

    Nov 13, 2008 at 8:15 am

    Jet, take comfort that everyone experiences that with their cause (and it's part of the downside of the media coin). They don't focus on the 99% of the population that is sensible they pick out the radicals and go straight for them. This is unfortunate because then your enemies point to the TV and say 'see I told you so'. I think it's a testament to the gay rights movement that there haven't been more instances of idiocy like this. Any group with millions of people in it usually has a few morons, gays have kept theirs under wraps for the most part.

    As a person who identifies with republicans (although I think healthcare should be treated like a right and am liberal on social issues) I get tired of seeing the two caricatures that always get dredged up for the benefit of the opponents. It's the radical retarded fundie and the racist redneck. The republicans I know aren't like that at all.

  • 14 - Condor

    Nov 13, 2008 at 8:24 am

    Jet,

    Lieberman is Lieberman because of his own chemistry. Nothing more or less than that. Everyone has chemistry and will act according to that chemistry. Violence has chemistry attached to it, as does Home or Hetro sexuality.

    You hate Lieberman? Because of his chemistry? Go look in the mirror, do you have any qualms with your chemistry, or people who have different chemistry than you do? What's that called?

  • 15 - Jet

    Nov 13, 2008 at 8:52 am

    Lieberman was a traitor to the Democratic party when he went independent and a traitor to both when he started showing up at republican events standing behind, making speaches for, and smiling and applauding for John McCain.

    Chemistry be damned.

  • 16 - Dave Nalle

    Nov 13, 2008 at 9:15 am

    I Joe Lieberman were a drag queen I might like him better.

    Dave

  • 17 - Ruvy

    Nov 13, 2008 at 9:54 am

    Thank you for the answers, Jet. I appreciate it.

    Shabbat Shalom,
    Reuven

  • 18 - Lee Richards

    Nov 13, 2008 at 11:19 am

    Using nonviolent techniques, education, and passive resistance to gain the general sympathy and support needed to redress injustice are proven strategies.

    Belligerent tactics that alienate don't work nearly as well, if at all.

  • 19 - Dave Nalle

    Nov 13, 2008 at 12:26 pm

    As an interesting update, a source in Lansing suggests that the church which was attacked wasn't actually all that much worse than other evangelical churches in the area and wasn't particularly known for their anti-gay agenda. They seem to have been targeted because they were big and rich and high profile.

    Dave

  • 20 - Dr Dreadful

    Nov 13, 2008 at 12:53 pm

    "Gay activists can arm themselves easily enough and we're just fortunate that gun-toting gays like local blogger Big Gay Al..."

    Dave, did you just out Barger?!!??

    I thought he'd been professing his undying devotion to Sarah Palin a little too strenuously...

  • 21 - Glenn Contrarian

    Nov 13, 2008 at 12:54 pm

    Um, Dave -

    How many people have gays killed for NOT being gay?

    How many gays have homophobes killed for BEING gay?

    The incident you described listed NO injuries to anyone in that church. In my opinion it was closer to civil disobedience than any real threat to someone's life.

    The sad thing is that Bash Back!'s actions will backfire. As with all religions, the members are edified in that religion when they believe they are being persecuted. The best thing Bash Back! could have done was to hold peaceful demonstrations and do their best to educate those who hate them, for knowledge and education are surely the best inoculation against prejudice and discrimination.

  • 22 - Baronius

    Nov 13, 2008 at 5:44 pm

    Funny, no one's made the obvious comparison between these guys and Phelps's group. Peas in a pod.

  • 23 - zingzing

    Nov 13, 2008 at 6:18 pm

    except they aren't preaching hatred at funerals...

  • 24 - Baronius

    Nov 13, 2008 at 6:37 pm

    Yeah, but there are similarities, and they're both more interested in alienating outsiders than converting them. Above all, you know it'd drive them crazy to be compared to each other.

  • 25 - Dave Nalle

    Nov 13, 2008 at 10:48 pm

    How many people have gays killed for NOT being gay?

    Very few to none.

    How many gays have homophobes killed for BEING gay?

    Too many?

    What does this have to do with anything? Does having members of your group killed somehow justify killing random other people who committed no crime against you? Does it justify threatening or scaring other people who have done nothing to you?

    Punishment for crimes should be directed at the specific criminal, not reworked into vague harassment of large and essentially unrelated groups of people.

    The incident you described listed NO injuries to anyone in that church. In my opinion it was closer to civil disobedience than any real threat to someone's life.

    I never said there was a direct threat to anyone's life, but the situation was provocative and threatening, and very difficult to justify on any rational basis.

    Dave

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 10, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs