Former Majority Leader DeLay To Resign, Drops Out of Re-Election Contest

In a stunning about-face, Rep. Tom DeLay (R-TX) has decided to drop out of his race for re-election, according to the Washington Post, and will leave Congress before November, perhaps by the end of May, according to Time.

Depending on Texas replacement rules, a Republican could be appointed to complete his term and then run as an incumbent. Given how coy DeLay sounded in his Time interview — "we don't have to choose from my primary opponents" — this is the plan.

The rise to the fall of Tom DeLay is not unlike that of Former Majority Leader Newt Gingrich, who some say is considering a run for the presidency in 2008. [He has recently authored a book, often an early step.] However, DeLay sounds like he plans to take a more prominent public position than Gingrich did.

Key Aide Pled Guilty Friday
DeLay handily won his Republican primary in March. But on Friday, Tony C. Rudy (39), the former Majority Leader’s ex-deputy chief of staff, pled guilty to conspiracy and corruption on actions taken on behalf of Jack Abramoff, the lobbyist at the heart of a Capitol corruption investigation.

Rudy accepted at least $86,000 from Abramoff while employed by DeLay. And although he reportedly did not implicate DeLay on Friday, the San Jose Mercury News reports that he “finger[ed] his ex-boss - DeLay’s former chief of staff Ed Buckham - as playing a role in the congressional bribery scandal.”

Shifting Gears
DeLay, a born-again Christian, told Time that he believes he can accomplish his political goals outside of Congress, suggesting an evangelical role is in the cards:

"[T]his country was built on morals and religion… There is a connection between religion and politics, and religion and government… The people that go to church understand that a country has to be based on some sort of religion and fear of God because they understand that."

“Abortion on demand is still in this country, and I want to end abortion as we know it,” he continued. He also talked about replacing the income tax with a “fair tax,” “culture wars” and the “attack” on the American family. He also took a swipe at Ronnie Earle, repeating his claim that his Texas indictment is “a political hit job.”

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for kathy-gill

Article Author: Kathy Gill

Kathy is a motorcyclist and writer; a prof at UW in digital media and an MSF instructor; formerly state and federal lobbyist. More About US Politics at her regular blog.

Visit Kathy Gill's author pageKathy Gill's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - JP

    Apr 04, 2006 at 9:20 am

    Captain K-Street does not need to be in the public sector. His corruption will be better rewarded in the Private sector.

    Paragraphs like this scare me: "[T]his country was built on morals and religion... There is a connection between religion and politics, and religion and government... The people that go to church understand that a country has to be based on some sort of religion and fear of God because they understand that."

    Granted one shouldn't be *afraid* of religion or some reference thereto, but this suggests a much stronger relationship than I'm ready to endorse.

    Bye bye Tom!!!

  • 2 - Nancy

    Apr 04, 2006 at 9:25 am

    It's about time he gave in to GOP collegues' pleas to quit, but I don't think it has anything to do with him feeling bad for his constituents. DeLay is planning an Abramoff: he's quitting in order to dedicate his life to "good deeds" (for a few months at least) so that when he is sentenced, like Abramoff he can garner all kinds of gushing letters about what a wonderful, humanitarian fella he is, thereby getting the minimum sentence, just like his pal Jack. There is no sincerity in Tom DeLay, unless it's for his fondness for the slime that is his natural setting. His guile is as endless as his greed for power.

  • 3 - MCH

    Apr 04, 2006 at 11:35 am

    Another chicken haw....oops, that term is banned...how about, another hypocrite bites the dust.

  • 4 - RogerMDillon

    Apr 04, 2006 at 3:28 pm

    Too bad, I say. That just means now he'll become a lobbyist and work more behind the scenes. It's much better when these slugs have to work in the daylight.

  • 5 - Nancy

    Apr 04, 2006 at 3:30 pm

    The irony is, I suspect if he really, Really believed in God, he'd be shivering under the bed, 'cause God can't be "spun" & DeLay surely has a lot to answer for. More than most.

  • 6 - A.G.

    Apr 04, 2006 at 3:32 pm

    Nancy, just tell me what DeLay was doing that the rest of politicians aren't doing.

  • 7 - Nancy

    Apr 04, 2006 at 3:34 pm

    Not a blessed thing; but we were talking about DeLay, hence I didn't mention that every single one of them should be in mortal fear, Dem & GOP both - IF they really believed as they keep claiming they do.

  • 8 - Joey

    Apr 04, 2006 at 6:35 pm

    Someone in a position of authority within the party must have said something akin to "make him an offer he can't refuse"

    The ramifications of such a "suggestion" must have unhinged the insufferable TW@. Excuse me ladies.

    I used to be in a rage/punk band called TW@ I just can't get past the coolness of that moniker.

  • 9 - Dave Nalle

    Apr 04, 2006 at 6:39 pm

    I shed no tears for Delay, who was a sleazy bastard. It does trouble me that he was basically done in by a smear campaign with too littl evidence to mount a real court case, though. The reign of terror of Ronnie Earle needs to come to an end.

    Dave

  • 10 - Kathy

    Apr 05, 2006 at 4:25 am

    Dave - what makes you think this was the Texas indictment? There's been nothing new there -- but Rudy pled guilty on *Friday* then DeLay decides to resign on Monday. It seems far more likely to be linked to Abramoff, IMO.

    RE lobbying -- lobbying in and of itself isn't a bad thing. However, the way $ is being thrown around makes me shiver. Plus, the Senate effectively said "pay attention to our words, not our deeds" with their (in)action last week.:-/

  • 11 - Justin Berry

    Apr 05, 2006 at 5:54 am

    It seems likely to me that O.J. and M.J. were guilty,IMO.

    IMO doesnt get convictions but in the casr of Earle it gets indictments.I have yet to hear of any of Delays aides rolling over on him, but Im sure Earle will see to it that they do.

    Tom Delay is a sleazy politician, no doubt. Surely, Earle could have found something to indict him on other than this shop job.

  • 12 - Bliffle

    Apr 05, 2006 at 9:13 am

    Good riddance. Too bad it wasn't years ago before he did as much damage as he did. Just look, now poor AG must induce himself to believe that ALL politicians are as bad as DeLay in order not to diminish his worship of the man. Sad, sad, sad.

  • 13 - Joey

    Apr 07, 2006 at 10:58 pm

    I had never considered that DeLay thought himself a contender. I never thought he had any real power on the hill. I never thought about him period, even during those rugged days which fostered his departure.

    Am I out of the loop?

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 22, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs