Forget the Apocalypse: Four Things to Actually Worry About in 2012 - Page 2

With the death of Kim Jong-Il in December after nearly twenty years of iron fisted rule, the world looked on as his rotund and politically inexperienced son, Kim Jong-Un, ascended to power at the tender age of 27(ish) in a series of televised events. While many hope that this will open up an opportunity for reform in the country, others fear that it will set off a bout of political instability and the collapse of the country. In the event of total collapse, it is feared that the United States could inadvertently be drawn into military conflict with China as the former rushes in to secure nuclear weapons and the latter rushes in to stop a torrent of refugees. Sure, everything looks calm now in North Korea, but no one really knows what is going on under the veil of secrecy that shrouds the country.  

3) Iran

The Bottom Line: With the strictest sanctions ever imposed on Iran squeezing the country's oil industry futher, it's not surprising that people worry about a looming confrontation with the West. While outright military confrontation is unlikely, even the threat of a major disruption in the oil supply could send oil prices soaring, sending the world economy and its nascent recovery back into recession.

It looks like it's going to be another hot year in Iran. With 2012 barely a week old, we're already seeing a crisis brewing. The United States and Europe have recently decided on some of the toughest sanctions yet on Iran, targeting, in particular, their oil industry, a major source of national income. In addition the West is increasingly putting pressure on Asian importers of oil like Japan and Korea to reduce their reliance on Iranian oil. In short, Iran has a lot to lose from these sanctions, and they're obviously not too happy about them. In fact, they've threatened to block the Strait of Hormuz, a vital artery for the export of Middle Eastern oil. While most experts don't think that Iran would actually go through with their threat and risk a potential military confrontation with the West, world governments are already hatching plans to release emergency oil reserves just in case the flow of oil is disrupted in the coming months. Even without a major confrontation, the simple threat of instability in the Middle East could send oil prices soaring, resulting in fledgling economic recoveries all across the globe coming to a screeching halt.  

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2 — Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - Glenn Contrarian

    Jan 10, 2012 at 7:18 am

    I disagree with three of your four.

    The Euro - I agree. The Euro was a grand experiment with the best of intentions, but they did not foresee (even though they were almost certainly warned) of what would happen to the currency and by extension the rest of the nations if one nation or more would default. They set themselves up for failure just like setting up a row of dominos...and we may all wind up paying a huge price.

    North Korea - Nah. I'm really not that worried about them. Sure, they'll continue down the path of idiocy, and when they get too far out of line they'll be told in no uncertain terms by Beijing to behave. And even if they did go all-out batcrap crazy and do something stupid, they could seriously damage South Korea and do some damage to the world economy before they fell, but that's about it.

    Iran - This is the big misconception of the West, that Iran wants nukes because of America and Israel. That's NOT the real reason. Iran wants nukes because Iran is Shi'a and nuclear-armed (and not-so-stable) Pakistan has nukes. America and Israel are the excuse, but Pakistan is the reason. Also, Iran knows full well what would happen if they were to launch or to smuggle a nuke to the West...they're not stupid.

    "Creeping authoritarianism of Europe" - Whether this is a threat really depends upon the economy. If the world economy gets better, then this will stop boiling and go back to simmering. Bad economies always open the door for regime change - Europe's not authoritarian yet...and if we can get the world economy back on track, they'll go back to having some common sense.

    Other than apocalyptic extinction events, the single biggest threat, IMO, is H5N1. If it ever becomes as easily transmitted as H1N1, the world is in for a nightmare the likes of which humanity has not experienced. And no, I'm not exaggerating. Currently there's some real hope for a universal flu vaccine. If they can get that done in time. If they can't, it's only a matter of time.

  • 2 - Christopher Rose

    Jan 10, 2012 at 8:04 am

    Not at all sure that any of these are the biggest problems facing the world. Sure, they all have the potential to kick off at any time but a proper understanding of the risks helps.

    The problem with the Euro is actually the problem with Europe. The cradle of democracy has actually constructed something that is anything but democratic. The politicos have actually chickened out of forming the United States of Europe (for want of a better name) and have set up a democratically non accountable body to rule it, the European Commission, and an elected but non ruling body, the largely pointless European Parliament.

    Add to this the egalitarian folly of using all member nation languages for everything and moving the entire thing back and forth between Brussels in Belgium and Strasbourg in France every two weeks and you have a recipe for chaos, which is exactly what we are getting.

    As to North Korea, they neither possess the "world's scariest nuclear arsenal" nor are in a position to threaten anyone, so I don't see this as much of a problem.

    As to Iran, I don't actually see why they shouldn't have nuclear weapons and it seems deeply hypocritical of we western powers to have them but insist others shouldn't.

    If you look at a map of the region and overlay on it where all the west's military bases are, Iran is practically surrounded by what it sees as either actively or potentially hostile threats.

    That's not to say their current leaders aren't bonkers, but that is true of many countries in the world, including some in the west and its allies.

    As to creeping authoritarianism, that is a major problem, but not just in Europe and most of all in the United States, which is still very influential and has one of the most over the top security networks and aggressive penal systems in the world.

    One of the real and largely unacknowledged major threats to the entire world is the overwhelming weight of dogma, which at both secular and spiritual levels is preventing everyone from speaking the truth.

    When we can't even talk honestly any more, how can we ever start to solve any of the challenges facing us?

  • 3 - Dr Dreadful

    Jan 10, 2012 at 9:00 am

    I can think of another one.

    If, as seems likely, Barack Obama is reelected as President of the United States in November, and the GOP retains control of the House and makes further gains (or even becomes a majority) in the Senate, the resultant ideological deadlock could snuff out for good any dreamy ideas the American economy had about recovery.

    That outcome would be just as bad, if not worse, for the global economy as the collapse of the Euro.

  • 4 - Baronius

    Jan 10, 2012 at 11:14 am

    The Euro - Yeah, another shock could hurt Europe, but does that translate into an economic problem for the US? I'm not sure; I've never looked at the numbers, but the US boomed while Europe struggled in the past few decades. Definitely the US economy impacts Europe's, but I don't know how much Europe's impacts the US's.

    North Korea - Yes. They've been a humanitarian crisis for years. I'm not so much worried about a formal armed conflict between outsiders as I am worried about what the collapse of North Korea could do to its people.

    Iran - Any time you've got crazies running a government, you have to include them on a list of potential worries. I'm surprised that more Muslim countries didn't make your list. Iraq, Egypt, Libya, Syria...the list of unstable countries is pretty long. And Turkey always seems ready to jump on that list.

    Europe Authoritarianism - You mentioned fears of a rightward turn, but European authoritarianism has many flavors. Ukraine and Russia both have internal problems and always border problems. And there are reasons to be concerned about the overarching European government overstepping its authority.

  • 5 - Glenn Contrarian

    Jan 10, 2012 at 11:36 am

    Doc #3 -

    I hate to say it, but I agree.

  • 6 - A. K. Moore

    Jan 11, 2012 at 3:54 am

    Wow! The comments on here are awesome! Thanks so much for taking the time to read and comment on my article. With that said, some comments on the comments:

    Glenn Contrarian, I agree with you that H5N1 is definitely a threat of the apocalyptic sort, but with that said, I don't think the likelihood of it being a major threat in 2012 is any different than recent years. I guess I was going for a more sort of "things to be more worried about in 2012 than in previous years." As far as your other comments, I would say that extreme damage to South Korea would be a very scary thing that would lead to drastic changes in the East Asian political landscape and have pretty serious global economic ramifications.

    Christopher Rose,as far as your diagnosis of the problem in Europe, I would half agree. From what I understand, the main problem facing the Euro is that it is a common currency among countries at vastly different levels of economic development and only a loose body watching over fiscal policy in these different states as opposed to a fiscal union. I would disagree with your assertion that the Europeans are too chicken to form a United States of Europe. The countries that are in relatively good fiscal shape have a very good reason for not wanting to share in the debts of their less fastidious southern neighbors. As for North Korea, I do think that it, along with Pakistan, have the scariest nuclear arsenals in the sense that they are in the most volatile political areas. I think this means that they are the nuclear arsenals most likely to be used (as unlikely as that eventuality is). Also, I would like to point out that North Korea is in a position to threaten South Korea as well as Japan. While that would certainly end in tears for North Korea, I don't know how much the East Asian powers (Japan, China, Russia, South Korea, USA) are willing to gamble that the regime in North Korea is not going to do something unfortunate, particularly during a potentially unstable period of power transition.

    Dr. Dreadful, I would put that as a threat for 2013, but I agree with the sentiment.

    Baronius, I strongly disagree with you about the Euro. This recession in Europe is fundamentally different from ones in the past in that it is a multi-country sovereign debt crisis, and not just a regular recession. The issue with a Euro collapse is that it could cause credit crunches all over the world as banks try to protect themselves much as they did during the crisis in 2008. Since American banks also have exposure to European debt, this could be a problem. In addition to this, this would not be slow growth like Europe experienced in the recent past. I would likely be a full on major recession/depression. I think it would definitely have a pretty extreme impact on the world economy, particularly since it's already in a fragile state.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 20, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs