Election Reaction

Eleanor Clift:

Ralph Nader was right. The Democrats didn’t need his help to lose. Nader’s share of the vote was miniscule. He thought, as many people did, that John Kerry would win. Nader held his final rally at a rundown library in the District of Columbia to draw attention to the misplaced priorities of a city focused on a new stadium while neglecting the needs of its citizens. “Welcome to John Kerry’s America,” he concluded, satisfied that even if few people were listening, he had spoken out and put pressure on Kerry to do better by America’s urban communities.

Nader offers a plausible if self-serving analysis for what went wrong for Kerry and the Democrats. He blames the “Anybody but Bush” mindset that led Democrats to set aside their issue differences with Kerry and give him a free ride. “Leave Kerry alone—make no demands on him,” that was the mantra, says Nader. The party’s various factions—labor, liberals, women, environmentalists—took a holiday. “They allowed Kerry to adopt ambiguous wishy-washy positions and they deprived him of the key to victory, which is bright lines,” says Nader.

Victor Davis Hanson:

Some of us have been saying for months that there was no way John Kerry was going to erase a stubborn 2-3 percent shortfall, for a variety of reasons. His unsolvable problems ranged from his Brahmin, aristocratic coldness and deductive pessimism, to his transparent and opportunistic flip-flopping, to the venomous "help" of the Michael Moore/Howard Dean/Al Franken extremist fringe, to the incongruity of billionaires voicing boutique leftism — whether that be the often-polarizing Teresa Heinz Kerry or the creepy George Soros. The electorate also sensed that a Kerry victory would represent to the Europeans, the Arabs, and our enemies in the field a repudiation of the current struggle against the terrorists.

Two multimillionaire lawyers from the East Coast were not populists in the manner of a Richard Gephardt, and it was the epitome of arrogance to pretend that they were. Now is not the time for the Democrats to harp about "a divided county," but to ensure that next time Hollywood, MoveOn.org, rock stars, and billionaire currency speculators do not headline their campaign, though venom and money they may bring. Perhaps someone in the Democratic party will tally up a Dukakis, Gore, and Kerry and conclude that there is a pattern here that leads to political suicide. And perhaps the world will conclude that America, thank God, still stands firm against the utopian socialism of the U.N., Europe, and its own privileged sophisticates.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2Page 3

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for rj-elliott

Article Author: RJ Elliott

RJ Elliott is a three-time graduate of the University of Central Florida. His passions in life are sports, politics, and nature. He dislikes daytime television, anti-American dictators, and people who talk like Garrison Keillor. …

Visit RJ Elliott's author pageRJ Elliott's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Hal Pawluk

    Nov 07, 2004 at 1:22 am

    On a lighter note, this news report:

    Canadian immigration officials cited by Reuters said that the number of US citizens visiting their website went up six-fold on Wednesday.

    The website has 20,000 visitors on an average day, but after the election that number swelled to 115,016. On Thursday, the figure was still higher than normal - almost 66,000.

  • 2 - RJ

    Nov 07, 2004 at 1:29 am

    I hope these "Americans" all move far, far away...

  • 3 - Shark

    Nov 07, 2004 at 10:32 am

    RJ: "...I'm not sure what makes me happier: Kerry losing, or Leftist "journalists" losing..."

    And how do you feel about America losing?

    ...Iraq.

    You broke it -- you own it.
    Have a nice four more years.

    ~ahahahahah~!

  • 4 - Jim Carruthers

    Nov 07, 2004 at 3:09 pm

    So pleasant that with Martha in prison, scrap-booking and doily making has moved beyond her usual constituency.

  • 5 - Hal Pawluk

    Nov 07, 2004 at 5:01 pm

    It's nice to see Canadians helping the US again (as they did with housing the planeloads of Americans on 9/11).

    I wouldn't have thought of trying to make The Ugly American look better your way, but it's definitely working. It's always handy to have a worse example for comparison.

    I'm not sure you had to make it that much worse, but keep up the good work, Carruthers.

  • 6 - andy marsh

    Nov 07, 2004 at 8:39 pm

    God Bless America - I'm really starting to think fences are a really good idea!

  • 7 - Jim Carruthers

    Nov 07, 2004 at 10:17 pm

    Amazing how a little strong Canadian language from the land of Terrance and Philip can make such he-men like RJ and whatnot crap their pantaloons.

    So, you don't have a functioning government, so, instead, fear being called a bunch of cock-knockers by the rest of the world.

    Yes, a fence would be what it would take to prove you are living in the equivilent of east germany.

    Boo! hey, look everybody, he crapped his pants! Boo!

  • 8 - boomcrashbaby

    Nov 08, 2004 at 12:49 am

    I thought the Right did not care what anybody outside our borders thought anyway.
    I think Canadians are noble.

  • 9 - Bob A. Booey

    Nov 19, 2004 at 7:13 am

    None of these so-called pundits you quote really said anything. Most of the post-election analysis has missed the point, by and large.

    That is all.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 29, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs