Despite Program Failures, 2008 Republican Platform Calls for Increased Funding for Abstinence Education - Page 2

While some states have pulled out of the program because of the continuous uncertainties regarding funding for the program, others have also taken note of the lack of supporting evidence of program success. For example, a rising pregnancy rate among 15-19 year-olds in Idaho had state officials thinking it was simply time to get out of the program.

In addition, opponents insist that the government program is simply too dogmatic. "It was just too strict," said Emily Hajek, a policy adviser to Iowa Governor Chet Culver. "You cannot be that prescriptive about how it has to be taught."

But any summation against abstinence education likely comes best from Dr. Ned Calonge, Colorado’s chief medical officer. Calonge’s assessment was based upon the federally funded study of four abstinence-only programs by Mathematica Policy Research Inc. published in April of 2007.

MPR “found that participants had just as many sexual partners as nonparticipants and had sex at the same median age as nonparticipants. That finding led Calonge to state:

"To show no benefit compared to nothing. That was striking. These are tax dollars that are going for no useful purpose, and it would not be responsible for us to take those dollars."

Uphill Battle for Republicans

Ironically, the platform also made a point of stressing support for programs that had a demonstrated track record of success. The platform states: "We advocate policies and methods that are proven and effective.”

While proponents of abstinence education continue to assert that abstinence is the only failsafe method for avoiding pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases, there is no concrete evidence that this unambiguous message for adolescents is effective. Taken as a set of statements, increased funding for the governmental abstinence education program definitively contradicts the notion of supporting a program with a proven record.

And as for the presidential race and the Republican platform, given that Governor Palin is a proponent of abstinence education, the recent revelations regarding her teenage daughter, Bristol serve as additional evidence that the abstinence-only message simply does not cut it with adolescents.

In fact, Republicans, most especially Governor Palin, all have to be hoping that a 527 political action committee does not take a page out of the politics of personal destruction playbook that has been the hallmark of the Karl Rove era and apply it to the situation involving the Governor's teenage daughter.

Page 1 — Page 2
Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for tom-hanson

Article Author: Tom Hanson

After 30+ years in education, Tom retired in June of 2007 to spend more time with his family. A parent, grandparent, teacher, coach and administrator, he truly “relishes the opportunity to share his thoughts on the challenges facing educators and families in today’s complex world.”

Visit Tom Hanson's author pageTom Hanson's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own

Article comments

  • 1 - Matthew T. Sussman

    Sep 09, 2008 at 11:48 pm

    Actually this is quite clever. When one's learning about how Jesus invented DNA, studies show teenagers' sex drive dramatically decreases.

    Teach both? Shit, teach all three.

  • 2 - Silas Kain

    Sep 10, 2008 at 1:42 am

    Hmm, Matt. Jesus and 12 guys holed up in an attic drinking wine, eating "herbs" and chowing on lavosh bread while wearing togas on a Thursday night. Somehow I don't think everyone abstained that night. Oh, Lord, I feel the hate coming.

  • 3 - jamminsue

    Sep 10, 2008 at 2:17 am

    Tom, excellent article: You said: given that Governor Palin is a proponent of abstinence education, the recent revelations regarding her teenage daughter, Bristol serve as additional evidence that the abstinence-only message simply does not cut it with adolescents.
    I dislike being rude or saying inflammatory things, but am not sure how else to express this: How can one expect rationality or consistency from the Christian Right? They have been programmed (maybe they were never allowed to think) to have a very strident and cruel response to anyone who suggests anything but abstinence, despite overwhelming proof that it does not work (Remember Nancy Regan’s “Just say no”?). The attachment and monomania to ideas surrounding creating human life that may have been good at the end of the Plague or maybe the Flood is sad and confusing to the rest of us. The rest of us somehow manage to think and learned the Law of Minimum. We understand humans have no predators and have controlled disease, consequently, the population explosion is dangerous.
    This knee jerk response is the factor that won George HW and George W their Presidencies. Until these monomaniacal people lose their political clout, and are relegated back into the dark ages where they belong, the rest of us somehow have to find an issue to re-focus those who have followed this vocal minority and try to get some sanity back as the predominant voice in this country.

  • 4 - Lisa Solod Warren

    Sep 10, 2008 at 7:00 am

    Just say NO never works, never will.

  • 5 - Joanne Huspek

    Sep 10, 2008 at 9:53 am

    My kids went to Catholic school, where abstinence only is the only thing taught. Did the students there follow the direction of their health and religion teachers? From what I can determine: NOoooo... They are kids, and the natural tendencies of most teenagers is to do exactly the opposite of what their parents and teachers preach.

    Parents are most responsible, and they must provide all information and ALL options.

    No matter how diligent, it's hard to just say "no" above the flush of raging hormones.

  • 6 - Dr Dreadful

    Sep 10, 2008 at 11:40 am

    Wasn't "Just Say No" an anti-drugs campaign?

    Still, the point is clear. Look how well that one worked out.

  • 7 - Matthew T. Sussman

    Sep 10, 2008 at 1:26 pm

    "Just say NO never works, never will."

    Worked for most of the girls I dated.

  • 8 - Dr Dreadful

    Sep 10, 2008 at 1:34 pm

    With those eyebrows, Matt, I'm not surprised!

    ;-)

  • 9 - Cannonshop

    Sep 10, 2008 at 2:47 pm

    If your fear is that saying no might not work for your little girl, I recommend the gift of Pepper Spray and a stun-gun. These accessories go very well for the young lady on the go, and they're less controversial than a handgun or good knife. (though it would, imho, be better if we could give young women access to, and training with, both.)

    If you're afraid she WON'T say "No", well...that's different. Democrats have their quixotic causes, and this one's the Republicans' quixotic cause. Whether SHE says "No" or not is strongly influenced by her natural inclinations combined with her own reasoning capacity and decision making structure. Obviously, for example, Bristol did what millions of Preachers' kids do, and defied Mom...with consequences. But I defy any Democrat to find five teenagers who don't know what a Condom is for, or that Condoms are widely available cheap in the same places they use fake I.D. to buy smokes and beer.

  • 10 - Baronius

    Sep 10, 2008 at 5:03 pm

    Studies have shown that abstinence-only education doesn't work, but abstinence-only programs do. They typically combine education with counseling or some reinforcements.

  • 11 - jamminsue

    Sep 10, 2008 at 5:04 pm

    "Just Say No" was the anti-drug policy put in place by President Ronald Regan, the man who declared ketchup is a vegetable.

    I was not referring to male rape, only that kids will experiment no matter what. Experimentation is part of the process towards becoming an adult. For healthy individuals, sex drive is farily strong during puberty and young aduthood. So having proper education on how human reproduction works and some options to hopefully delay the ultimate result, is not sinful or encouraging kids to experiment, it is recognizing a fact of human biology and giving kids CHOICES.

    Isn't that what America is all about - education, choice and freedom of expression?

  • 12 - Baronius

    Sep 10, 2008 at 5:34 pm

    If you remember the culture of the 1970's, you'll know that "Just Say No" was actually a pretty important thing. It was the first time in a long while that anyone took an anti-drug stand.

  • 13 - jamminsue

    Sep 11, 2008 at 4:35 pm

    I never knew a time from when I remember - early 1960's, ever since - when there was concern about drug use.

    Even during the Summer of Love there was concern

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 30, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs