Could Alaska’s “Hottie” Governor Be the GOP’s VP Nominee in 2008? - Comments Page 2

Is Governor Sarah Palin of Alaska the next GOP VP choice?

Alaska’s “hottie” Republican governor, Sarah Palin, is a character straight out of the now defunct television classic Northern Exposure. This former beauty queen is ethical to the point where it almost cost her a political career, filing accusations of ethics violations against some of the most important Alaskan Republican officials. She has become an antidote to tales of woe and Republican corruption that seem to find their way out of Alaska in an almost weekly basis. Refreshingly honest, Palin, 43, even admits that when marijuana was legal in Alaska, she tried it, inhaled, but did not like it!…
Read comments below, or read this article from the beginning.

Article comments

  • 26 - Christopher

    Aug 20, 2007 at 1:54 pm

    There is pressure on whichever candidate gets the nomination to pick the person who won second place in the primary season. For Republicans, that's going to be two white men, an unacceptable future we cannot accept. Sarah Palin is a great possibility and deserves to be on the short list.

  • 27 - InteriorPerson

    Aug 20, 2007 at 8:27 pm

    By the way, I'm a card carrying member of the Federalist Society. Debate me on the issues, please, instead of falsely labelling me as a left-wing fanatic. I may be a 5%, but I have principles and will not cowtow to the person who pretends to advance native issues while doing nothing of actual substance.

    I did not introduce race into this topic. The author, SJR, did that. I only responded to it, as a Native person, who has lived in the Interior. That is my duty. Moreover, even though we are both Indigenous peoples, Hawaiian person, our federal status is vastly different.

    So you checked out her website to determine her stand on Subsistence? You actually admit that's the extent of your research on this subject? Okay... Did you bother to find out exactly what side she supports? Fact: The people of AK want to bring subsistence to a vote (fair enough, right?). She stated in her campaign that she does not support a statewide vote on the issue. Why? Because the sports-fishing groups do not want a vote, even though ALL native groups do. While your at it, check out her chilly reception at AFN last fall. Check out her official response to Lyda Green's letter to DOI in May. Good luck at finding any substantive policy stmt issued by this governor --- pinning Sarah Palin down on native issues is an exercise in futility. Uhm, hugging native people and wearing ivory jewelry is NOT a policy position.

    Finally, please state two things Sarah has done for Natives. Photo-ops don't count. It should be easy since you said she has done more for natives than any individual in Alaska.

  • 28 - Stephen R. Maloney

    Aug 20, 2007 at 9:46 pm

    I'm sure that the reason Sarah has such a high approval rating from the people of Alaska, including Native peoples, is that she is concerned about all the citizens of the state, as the Constitution mandates her to do. Any individual or group that is looking for a handout is not going to be looked on favorably by Sarah Palin, and that's exactly as it should be. She realizes that establishing Native Alaskans as dependents would do nothing for their dignity or future. That is what she has DONE for the Native people, refusing to treat them as if they were some sort of subhuman creatures, which they are not. If that principled stand leads to her getting a chilly reception or two, so be it.

    steve

  • 29 - InteriorPerson

    Aug 20, 2007 at 11:50 pm

    Do you think I'm a poor Native looking for a handout and that is the basis for my discontent with the governor? Get a clue - I belong to the Federalist Society. My comments have been directed at her alleged support of Natives and the lack of direct evidence thereof.

    Moreover, I suspect from your superficial comments, Mr. Maloney, that you did not actually read the state budget. Please do and note those items not vetoed by Ms. Palin. Read the budget and then lets discuss handouts.

    I find your ego and lack of substance simply astounding. You not only speak for the entire Native populace you also dare to speak for Ms. Palin, too.

    I've always said that she is the mindless candidate for the mindless voter. Frankly, I don't care where she stands on Native issues. I'd just like her to take a position. Any position. She is a populist, hence, her popularity.

    Lastly, where does the state constitution mandate "concern?" I'm the one accused of being a liberal wacko while the Palin supporters continue to focus on touch-feely stuff. Let's discuss her position on the issues.

  • 30 - Sanity102

    Aug 21, 2007 at 2:39 am

    Interior Person...I think you've got Stephen and I mixed up in your reply. I'm not a "Hawaiian person"...I am PART Hawaiian and about 4 other races. I'm actually an American, born and bred from generations of Americans. And don't even try that "don't dare speak for me" BS. This is America and I can have any opinion I darn well please...yeah, and that means having the opinion that racism isn't exclusive to Whites.

    No you didn't bring up race but you sure ran with it didn't you? And complained about government handouts based on...RACE?

    Or is it culture...is it the culture of Alaska to want, demand, NEED government handouts?

    Is that what you're saying?

  • 31 - Stephen R. Maloney

    Aug 21, 2007 at 7:28 am

    The state constitution of Alaska indicates that the resources of Alaska belong to the people of that state.

    I would like to salute SJ Reidhead for writing what I believe is the best piece ever produced on Gov. Sarah Palin.

    I'd also like to salute my friend Sanity102 for resisting racism in all its forms, including the kind that subtly regards some people as inherently inferior and thus demands special treatment.

    steve

  • 32 - InteriorPerson

    Aug 21, 2007 at 10:41 pm

    My second post was divided into paragraphs to respond to each poster that directed a comment towards me. I assumed that every person could distinguish to whom my comments belonged. Obviously, it was confusing to Hawaiian person.

    Remember, I did not introduce race or handouts in this discussion. The author framed Palin as a candidate that appeals to Natives. I disagreed and put forth fact-based reasons for my position. My points have yet to be refuted. Mr. Maloney attempted to divert attention by referring to "handouts." In my initial post, I listed 3 Native issues: subsistence, federal recognition and tribal jurisdiction. Each one has no connection to "handouts" by the state whatsover. Mr. Maloney tried to make this into a welfare debate instead of addressing Palins' absolute absence of a position on any of these 3 issues that would support the Native POV.

    Do you folks read the ADN or just stick to pro-Palin drivel? Read the Letters to the Editor in the 8/21 edition ... there is yet another 5% speaking out.

    Lastly, if this is the best Pro-Palin piece in the media, then it totally supports my theory that she is the mindless candidate for the mindless voter.

  • 33 - InteriorPerson

    Aug 21, 2007 at 10:48 pm

    Steve Maloney is subtly accusing me of racism.

    Aren't you?

    You have zero basis for such an egregious accusation. You lost this debate and resorted to the tactics of a scoundrel.

    Cheers.

  • 34 - InteriorPerson

    Aug 21, 2007 at 10:52 pm

    Sanity102 - your inanity speaks for itself.

    WHERE did I COMPLAIN about RACE based HANDOUTS?

    I didn't. Not even close.

  • 35 - Sanity102

    Aug 22, 2007 at 2:19 am

    Interior Person...ok, we'll play your word game.

    "subsistence"

    My (and the dictionary) definition: Support as in government handout.

    YOUR definition: (please fill in your answer)

    "federal recognition"

    Me: Of What? You are an American JUST like everyone else that was born in the USA.

    YOU: (your answer)

    "tribal jurisdiction"

    Me: The "tribe" is based on what exactly? Historical location of ancestors or...RACE?

    YOU: (your comment)

    Please answer the above and tell me if you, as a "native" believe that you should get something the rest of us Americans don't get...and what are you basing that on if not for your "native" race?

  • 36 - Stephen R. Maloney

    Aug 23, 2007 at 11:40 pm

    Yes, I was accusing Interior Person of racism. He believes a certain segment of the population must be treated like children, and that is racism.

  • 37 - tswhit

    Oct 09, 2007 at 12:47 am

    Bless her incompetent heart

    Great way it put it.....
    The question. Who will pick up the pieces after this chick is done with playtime? This is real life, real businesses, real families, real people that her incompetent leadership has affected. We get what we deserve.. So Sarah can have on the job training..... She has in 1 year laid the foundation for our economic destruction And you people want her to have chance to do that to the whole country? Are you flippin kidding ?

  • 38 - C. Miller

    Dec 06, 2007 at 3:28 pm

    I just received the defenders of wildlife letter telling how the govern is all in favor of killing wolves and their cubs. I think this is horrible and uncalled for. My word, to gun down these creatures of God from airplanes. Now, that's real brave and good hunting skills. How can people approve of this kind of killing??? Doesn't anyone in this world understand they have every right to exist as we all do?? I can't see and benefit in this type of action except the $150.00 bounty for killing these creatures. Are we getting that cold hearted we will resort to this type of action for money? Use that money instead to help control naturally these animals and help people in you state. Don't kill innocent animals just to do it.

    I've said all I can without getting extremely angry. Please rethink your actions and rule from you heart. If this goes on just think how are future children will not have any knowledge of the wild beautiful creatures in this world and it was all wiped out for the almighty buck. Too much in this world revolves around money, money,money it so sad.

    Thank you

  • 39 - Alaskan Dave

    Feb 29, 2008 at 3:18 pm

    Things you need to know about Sarah Palin:

    Sarah Palin, aka Sarah Chavez, proposed and pushed through the largest raise in taxes in Alaska's history. She supports the idea that the State can seize the property of oil producers in Alaska if they don't do what she wants. She has attacked almost the entire Republican majority in the house and senate. She stood by and giggled when a radio shock jock called the Republican President of the Senate a "bi*ch" and "a cancer". She threatened to support Democrats running against Republicans if they did not support her tax and spend policies.

  • 40 - Syrin

    Apr 05, 2008 at 9:20 pm

    This inept governor Sarah Palin has secured a high approval for terrorizing and taxing business, growing government and giving every special intrest group just what they want or more. Most Alaskans are unaware that she is not what she says or what her label as conservative seems to be. Sarah has created an atmosphere of hate and discontent in the state of Alaska. She just resently tried to oust the Chairman of the Republican Party of Alaska. We have a few years -unless she resigns! She came in as a fresh face with NO experience and NO flippin clue and we are reaping the benefits of that misjudgment. Sarah Palin should never be considered for any political position ever. She is a disaster!

    What is a Narcissist?
    Sarah Palin has shown signs of this illness "An all-pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behaviour), need for admiration or adulation and lack of empathy, usually beginning by early adulthood and present in various contexts."

  • 41 - Boston Democrat

    Jun 06, 2008 at 12:21 am

    Of all the people whose names have been floated, she's the only one who scares me. She might make it a fight. I think instead you folks should run Haircut Romney as Veep. We *loved* him here in Massachusetts. Really. Bahahaha.

  • 42 - Dave Adamson

    Jul 17, 2008 at 11:37 pm

    Before you throw away the Republican ticket by including someone you know little about, please review the emerging troubles in Alaska for the Governor. This could change many minds nationwide. She is NOT what she claims she is.

  • 43 - Glenn Johnson

    Aug 29, 2008 at 7:39 pm

    Well, you are a psychic! Good call a full year ahead of the reality. And John McCain is a genius.

  • 44 - Joanne Huspek

    Aug 30, 2008 at 9:38 am

    Wow! Damned prophetic, I'd say!

  • 45 - lisa

    Sep 01, 2008 at 10:11 pm

    how many down syndrome children does she have? also, how many grandchildren by a teenager does she have? How much help did you need when you got married, now think what it would be if you are a teenager? Bidden is highly respected because he goes home at night. he puts family first. If a mother can't make her family first, why would i believe that she would put america first. I would have said, "thanks, but, no thanks". Many people don't accept job offers or promotions due to personal things that's going on. I think to take on the job as vice president of the united states with all else happening in her life should have had the response, thanks, but no thanks. Because if she was asked once she'll be asked again. bad judgement, bad decision. this is about the both of them being opportunist who can't see past winning.

  • 46 - Carol

    Sep 03, 2008 at 12:43 pm

    I think this was a BRILLIANT surprise. I did the happy dance all over the house. She is just what the Dr. Ordered.

    We all know Hillary for the daughter of Satan she is - liar, thief, immoral PIA lacking any experience but buying herself a place in politics.

    Are you men afraid of a strong, SMART, honest, attractive, experienced woman in our government? I find it marvelously refreshing!!!!!!!

  • 47 - Bea

    Sep 05, 2008 at 12:33 am

    I am just not buying anything that McCain is saying. I just watched and listened to his acceptance speech and he pretty much is not original. Anyone can wait for the other person to do their homework, let them turn it in to see what grade they get and then purposely turn their own work in late after borrowing the other guy's paper. He knows he cheated, but trys to play it down in his speech by saying we can share, it doesn't matter who gets the credit??? Now he proclaims to what change...right! Why now? Mccain lacks integrity, the choice of Palin was strictly about stealing votes to win. He's is a part of the 'Good ol Boy' network. Women are not allowed. Palin would never have a true voice. When they want her opinion they will give to her. You did listen to her speech didn't you...She just seems like a sassy girl. Being cute can't buy you everything, not when the country is at stake. Women should be very concerned. If Palin fails in anyway, a stunt like this could hinder future support of women in the white House. Hilary's caliber is unmatched by comparison. I just don't see the quality there in Palin for such a big job. People really need to consider all from what we have to choose from and vote for the people/party that is best for the COUNTRY. I would like our country's finances to get back into the 'black' and our economy to be on the upswing. Unfortunately I can only remember Americans being happy during terms when the Democrats were in office.

  • 48 - Silas Kain

    Sep 05, 2008 at 1:17 am

    Will there ever be a bipartisan spirit again in this country? Frankly, I'm sick of all the insults hurled by each side in desperation. The Democrats are NO better than the Republicans. There is good and bad on both sides but when they get to Washington they ALL sleep together regardless of party. We are either naive or completely stupid to believe that it is otherwise.

    The greatest gift we can bequeath to the next generation is the notion that there does not have to be a two party system in America. If there was ever a time when we were ripe for an all out political brawl it is now. Regardless of who sits behind the desk in the Oval Office nothing will change until we whip Congress into submission and evict the lobbyists on K Street. You want to get down to brass tacks? Do some research. Rank and file members of Congress receive $169,300 per year or $463.51 per day. Now, I just reviewed some F.E.C. filings and was quite surprised. Here are the top 10 recipients of cash, folks. Interestingly it's 5 Democrats and 5 Republicans. These numbers are from filings that were made over this summer. Now, my fellow Americans, isn't there something really wrong when a Senator raises millions of dollars and only makes a base salary of $169,300? Are we that stupid that we can't see there is something completely out of whack here? These ten senators received a combined $93,344,070.

    Kerry, J D-MA $15,144,436
    Coleman R-MN $12,386,045
    McConnell R-KY $10,934,212
    Cornyn R-TX $10,812,189
    Dole, E R-NC $8,403,552
    Baucus D-MT $7,553,612
    Landrieu D-LA $7,398,672
    Levin D-MI $7,331,084
    Durbin D-IL $7,137,796
    Chambliss R-GA $6,242,472

  • 49 - Silas Kain

    Sep 05, 2008 at 12:11 pm

    Not one comment on my list of the "big ten" in campaign receipts. Obviously Americans have no problem with members of Congress having bank accounts fatter than budgets of third world countries. Pathetic.

  • 50 - handyguy

    Sep 05, 2008 at 1:27 pm

    Rhetorically, at least, neither McCain nor Obama is a friend to the lobbying industry. I think money does poison politics. But probably every one of those ten senators has acted within the letter of the law. They feel they have to outraise their opponents to stay competitive.

    It is kind of ironic that McCain is using public financing and Obama is not. But if a candidate doesn't win, he can't accomplish anything. So if raising tons more money gives him a better chance to win and thus carry out his agenda, it's understandable, a no-brainer even.

  • 51 - M.Logan

    Sep 09, 2008 at 10:20 am

    I am completely disgusted with the over-the-top praise that the country is giving to Palin. We are being blind-sighted by her "heroic" feats of maintaining a family, as well as having the time to run for VP. However, no one seems to be looking at the big picture.

    Palin's family supportive to her needs, and backing of her constant work schedule, is suffering. Her teenage daughter is pregnant, and her 4month old BABY, diagnosed with Downsyndrome are being left behind, while mommy play running-mate to John McCain.

    Doesn't anyone else see that maybe before she is capable of running a country that is already in desperate need of re-vamping; she should focus on bigger issues at home. If she can't keep control of her family life how are we expected to believe she is the right choice to bring change for the better to a country so in need?

  • 52 - Silas Kain

    Sep 09, 2008 at 10:33 am

    Really now? Who are WE to judge her private family life? If the Obama Mammas want to play that game, here's one for you. Ever heard of George Obama - youngest brother of Barry? The guy lives on less than one dollar a day in abject poverty. Oh, but that's only a HALF brother so I guess that doesn't count. The way I see it the more the Obama people whisper this cruel little smear campaign the more worried they must be. But remember, the more you fuel the flames of divisiveness, the more the other side will dig and I don't think anyone wins in the end.

  • 53 - C. A. Long

    Sep 21, 2008 at 11:17 am

    I support Sarah, she is what we need in DC. . Since qualifications in DC are so important, I feel that Sarah will be the only one with true needs
    experiance and can relate with the working class
    across America.

    What are the qualification requirements for a
    candidate to run for public office?

    You must be at least 18 years of age.
    A U.S. citizen (natural borne) for president.
    Be able to read and write english.
    Be of sound and moral character.
    Free of any criminal history.

    The "Degree Prerequesit Metefor" is killing America and the experiances of life and survival are no longer important. You must have a Degree of some sorts and have enormus wealth.

    We need to bring common sence leadership back
    into our government and get rid if the overpaid
    attitudes which are sinking this country into
    depression and dispair.

    "GO SARAH!"& "KNOCK'EM OUT JOHN!"

    C. Long
    Chatsworth, GA


  • 54 - Cindy D

    Sep 21, 2008 at 11:57 am

    Why should anyone trust the opinions of people who likely voted for Bush twice?

  • 55 - Cindy D

    Sep 21, 2008 at 12:00 pm

    "...Alaska's "Hottie" Governor..."

    Well, if we have to choose based on decorative merit, I think Obama should be president. Black goes with everything. He'll likely look good with the wallpaper in the oval office.

  • 56 - C. A. Long

    Sep 24, 2008 at 10:12 am

    We keep hearing the promisses of change but we never hear of the changes our government needs within its inferstructure such as:
    Any elected official such as that of the senate or congress wishing to bid for the presidential seat must resign from his or her elected seat upon
    qualifying to run for the presidential seat.
    ( He or she under the chain of command structure of the federal govervment is being paid to serve the people and the higher level of administration.
    We the people are paying them to run around and politic against the body of gov. which he
    or she has sworn to serve and the people they
    have sworn to represent, and in that oath to office nothing is ever mentioned about doing for this party or that party.)
    A second change which needs to take place
    is restricting those elected officials to 2 (two)
    consecutive terms of office as that or the
    president.
    A third change would be to pass a bill which
    recognizes English as Americas official language.
    I could go on and on with changes and
    regulations of common intrest, those of which
    you never hear the candidates talking about.

    "GO SARAH & KNOCK"EM OUT JOHN!"

    C.A. Long
    Chatsworth, GA

  • 57 - Cindy D

    Sep 24, 2008 at 10:40 am

    Well, C.A. Long, I have only one thing to say to that.

    Translated

  • 58 - C. Long

    Sep 27, 2008 at 10:51 am

    Translated?

    Sure Cindy D. how many extras were employed to translate your cute message. I can dress up and rehears all walks of life.

    Put lipstick on a pig and you still have a pig!

    Over the past four years we have sent 15 billion tax dollars to three countries in South Africa to fight aids, not to mention the billions to reconstruct several others. Obama has stated that this is not enough, and that he will send more and do more. That I find hard to swallow when there are thousands of Americans which are homeless and hungry along the Gulf Coast since hurricane Katrina.

    Don't go out and purchase any lipstick on my behalf. It won't do any good anyway, I know! I raise pigs.

    "Oink Oink!"
    C. Long

  • 59 - Elle

    Oct 04, 2008 at 11:56 am

    Sarah....please...stop winking at the world like we're all agreeing to this charade of yours!

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 22, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs