Children misbehave at Republican convention - Page 2

The AIDS activist group ACT UP later claimed responsibility. Police said there was at least one arrest.

What is ACT UP's beef with W? The feds are spending a lot more money on AIDS than other diseases. Bush himself is pushing for bunches of money to combat AIDS in Africa. They don't really have much legitimate complaint, but they're mad at Daddy, so there!

Perhaps they're mad that Bush hasn't put on a lab coat and personally invented a cure for HIV. Maybe they think he should just pass a law requiring the drug companies to somehow cure this disease.

Shut up, you little babies. Quit acting up. The adults are talking. Go make your own convention. Get a hall, have some speeches. Go stand on the corner and shout your little lungs out. Just do it on your own dime.

Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for al-barger

Article Author: Al Barger

Unreformed hawkish Hoosier hillbilly Al Barger runs the still squeezin' down the psychodelic Kentucky moonshine at More Things. What with the paranoid religious visions, the Pentecostal music, visions of God and anarchy running amok and such, somebody …

Visit Al Barger's author pageAl Barger's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - boomcrashbaby

    Sep 01, 2004 at 3:47 pm

    I guess when someone shouts, you don't hear what they say? ACT UP is protesting government's relationship with the pharmaceutical industry. They also protested, but less so, during Clinton's presidency.

    For the pharmaceutical industry, a pill or a treatment that cures someone is a one-time income from the patient. If the patient needs 20 or more pills a day to fend off HIV, then the pharmaceutical company gets a long term source of revenue from the individual (or the insurance company/government).

    No, Bush isn't expected to put on a lab coat, that's silly. He is expected to work on behalf of his citizens, especially those that need help, is he not? His lack of doing so is what is being protested. It's costing lives.

  • 2 - jack e. jett

    Sep 01, 2004 at 4:07 pm

    democrats have played the pansie hand long enough. you must fight fire with fire now. i say, hats off to the protesters. they deserve a medal for being able to get it.

    al, you are really cool with all this.

    jack

  • 3 - Rodney Welch

    Sep 01, 2004 at 4:11 pm

    Reading Al's headline, I thought for sure he was referring to these little babies.

  • 4 - Eric Olsen

    Sep 01, 2004 at 4:12 pm

    I did too, they were nervous, gigling, silly little twits

  • 5 - Al Barger

    Sep 01, 2004 at 4:32 pm

    I see, Boom. So it's a pharmaceutical conspiracy to NOT cure HIV so that they can keep selling daily treatments. So then you really think that the president should, in fact, order the drug companies to cure HIV?

    However, even if you believe something this plain damned silly, that STILL doesn't give you the right to stop other people from having their say. Print up some handbills and pass them out on the sidewalk, but you don't get to just vandalize or shut down other people's meetings because you disagree with them.

  • 6 - boomcrashbaby

    Sep 01, 2004 at 4:50 pm

    Al, I've never been an ACT UP member. I don't really want to be the one to explain their ideology, I don't feel I have the qualification. That's my understanding that is what they are primarily protesting, but probably other things as well.

    While I haven't experienced what they have experienced to get them to their ideology, I know that they care passionately about it, that they truly believe in their cause, and that while I don't know exactly what the relationship between the pharmaceutical companies and the government is, I know that these people who dedicate their lives to their cause, most likely have reason to believe something is up.

    If one TRULY believes that the actions or the inactions of the government is costing the lives of someone he cares about, he'd be an ass, Al, if all he did was "Get a hall, have some speeches".

    It's unfortunate that blocking traffic in NY is such an inconvenience for you, in...where was it again?

  • 7 - Marc

    Sep 01, 2004 at 5:18 pm

    Boomcrashbaby: "then the pharmaceutical company gets a long term source of revenue from the individual (or the insurance company/government)."

    You may not be a ACT member but you sure aren't adverse to parroting hairbrained theories all in the name of [not] "explain[ing] their ideology."

    Dedication to a cause doesn't always correlate to something being up.

    These people are dedicated to their cause, as are these people will you be quoting or defending them in the future?

    Dedication means exactly zero if your methods obscure your message. By breaking laws they only bring scorn to themselves and their cause.

  • 8 - Al Barger

    Sep 01, 2004 at 5:24 pm

    I see how it works, Boom. Just convince yourself that you have some kind of supposed grievance. Then you have not only the right, but the positive obligation to shut down anyone from meeting or speaking who is not on your bandwagon. Why, you'd be an ASS if you didn't.

  • 9 - Dan

    Sep 01, 2004 at 7:38 pm

    Now I'm starting to see the strategic wisdom of the Republicans not instituting those free speech concentration camps the way the Dem's did. They'll capture the political middle by just sitting back and letting folks see these dim-witted degenerates in action.

  • 10 - Al Barger

    Sep 01, 2004 at 7:54 pm

    No kidding, Dan. Just consider the barely concealed seething hatred for W by the Democrat convention delegates - much less the stupid disruptive behavior of these protesters.

    Contrast that to the Republican delegates lovefest. Notice that the delegates on the floor of the Republican convention were even literally applauding John Kerry for his valorous service in the military.

    Who would you rather be associated with, the angry Democrat delegates and their mindless idiot protesters, or these nice, friendly, well-behaved Republicans? Which ones would you want for neighbors?

    I don't support a lot of what the Bush administration does, but they certainly seem to represent a much higher class of individuals.

  • 11 - boomcrashbaby

    Sep 01, 2004 at 8:10 pm

    As I said before, I have never acted on ACT UP's behalf. I have never been an activist or broken the law to make a political point.

    However, being part of a group that wasn't treated as human until an act of civil obedience (Stonewall), I can certainly see their viewpoint more than a smarmy conservative in Madison Square Gardens, feeling all 'compassionate', might.

  • 12 - boomcrashbaby

    Sep 01, 2004 at 8:11 pm

    obedience should be disobedience.

  • 13 - Shark

    Sep 02, 2004 at 8:58 am

    Al, re. the pharmaceutical industry

    Dangit Al, for a Libertarian, you're incredibly gullible, naive, and uninformed on this subject.


    Re: Children misbehaving - I'm with the others; I thought this would be about those inbred little Bush twins -- whose next gig will inevitably be next season's "The Simple Life" tv show.

    Gawd, they were horrible.

    "...Mommy and Daddy call each other "bushy...""

    Oh please, please don't use words and imagery that force me to picture laura's bush!


Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 18, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs