Card Check, Black Panthers and the Democrat War on the Secret Ballot

When the Democrats made card check their top priority, many wrote it off as something only for unions. Card check is the policy that allows unions to get certified by simply getting enough signatures and bypassing the voting process that allows for a secret ballot to determine if workers really want to unionize.

On Election Day in 2008, when Black Panthers armed with clubs occupied a polling station in Pennsylvania and shouted at voters going into the booths, many wrote it off as involving only one polling booth (even if the Department of Justice dropped all charges and "reassigned" the prosecutor who opened the investigation in the first place).

What if a state Attorney General argued that voters for any political election simply had no fundamental right to privacy on Election Day? Would we take notice then?

Consider the following words argued in Champaign County Court in Illinois by the Illinois Attorney General's office headed by Lisa Madigan:

While plaintiff attempts to suggest to the Court that there is a fundamental right to a secret ballot, no such right exists. (bottom of Page 11 of pleading)

The issue at hand is the result of a law changed in 2007 with SB 662. The bill clocked in at just under 200 pages and, as is custom in Illinois, rank-and-file legislators didn't read the bill. Tucked in this legislation were a few small clauses that required voting machines to reject any ballot where a voter did not vote in all races. Seems okay so far.

However, after rejecting the ballot an election judge comes down to have a conversation with the voter. On paper, at least, they give the voter three choices: fix the ballot, get a new ballot, or go home and your vote isn't counted. There are plenty of reasons to not vote in every race but the most important is that a voter should be able to vote however they please without an election judge questioning them on it.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Profile image for john-bambenek

Article Author: John Bambenek

John Bambenek is a freelance columnist and author. His first technical book is the grep Pocket Reference. He is a digitial forensics expert and owns his own cybercrime consulting firm, Bambenek Consulting.

Visit John Bambenek's author pageJohn Bambenek's Blog

Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - GM Roper

    Jan 06, 2010 at 6:18 am

    John, it should be obvious that the democrats and too many republicans, as well as too many other "persuasions" are more interested in raw naked power over the populace than is good for a republic like ours.

    I worry about the fate of our country, as well as the complacency of today's typical voters. Thanks for a well written heads up for the entire country.

  • 2 - Lee

    Jan 19, 2010 at 10:13 am

    I did not know this. When I last voted, my ballet was kicked out and someone came up and told me that I had knot filled out the entire ballet. I told him that I was aware of that and he just said 'ok'. Never was I told that my vote would not be counted because of what I had done. I am furious!

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 20, 2013

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs