Can The RNC Be Indicted In Tom Delay-Gate?

The alleged money laundering that has become a modus operandi for the Republican culture of corruption is becoming increasingly well-known. At the center of the alleged money laundering is the ring-leader and recently indicted Tom DeLay, the creater and owner of a Political Action Committee called TRMPAC, which was also indicted in the ever-widening criminal scandal in Texas.

Alphaliberal.comIn Texas the law is clear: it is illegal to take corporate money and use it for elections. In an alleged money laundering scheme, Tom DeLay’s PAC took corporate money, sent it to the RNC, who cut checks back to individual canditdates in Texas.

Even though the money went through the RNC, it is still corporate money in violation of Texas law. The sham transaction that was funneled through the RNC was merely a guise to hide the source of the corporate funds and evade Texas law.

DeLay met for at least 30 minutes with his top TRMPAC fundraiser, the also-indicted Jim Ellis, in early October of 2002 --the same day that the RNC in Washington set in motion a series of financial transactions at the heart of the case against DeLay and TRMPAC.

Alphaliberal.comEllis had earlier given the RNC a check for $190,000 drawn mostly from corporate contributions. The same day as the meeting, the RNC ordered $190,000 worth of checks sent to seven Republican legislative candidates in Texas.

All of this will become more clear as the trial of Tom DeLay and TRMPAC proceeds or if he cops a plea. The lingering question is that when you launder money, the entity you are funneling it through is guilty of money laundering as well. Why hasn't the Republican National Committee itself been indicted?

The prosecutor who brought the indictment, Ronnie Earle, has not described the evidence he presented to the grand jury linking DeLay to the $190,000 transactions. But the fact that DeLay and his alleged co-conspirator, fundraiser Ellis, conferred on the same day the checks were ordered has attracted speculation that the two men shared information at the heart of the conspiracy on that day.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • Worse Than Watergate: The Secret Presidency of George W. Bush Worse Than Watergate: The Secret Presidency of George W. Bush

    Nobody knows more, both from firsthand experience and legal expertise, about the abuse of presidential power and its dangers than John W. Dean, former counsel to President Nixon.In WORSE THAN WATERGATE, ...

Article comments

  • 1 - Dr. Kurt

    Oct 09, 2005 at 4:55 pm

    While a conspiracy is a conspiracy, and should indeed be prosecuted, I won't hold my breath. It would be fun, though, to go after corporate campaign crimes at a national level.

  • 2 - Marcia L. Neil

    Oct 10, 2005 at 12:00 pm

    'Nooz' funneled from a peninsula setting is pooled and manipulated until it 'fits' into major headline news stories. One reality is that a 'delayed' feline pregnancy here in the City of San Francisco, CA, peninsula demonstrated the ability of a female cat to time her litter as a sort of birth-order spacing -- three kittens months ago, and more live births within past weeks. That such information has been seized and trans-formed into a sort of defamation scheme is not surprising but always alarming.

  • 3 - bert

    Oct 11, 2005 at 8:37 am

    PAC's and SIG's are the downfall of america today, in my view...when we get to the point where representation is basically sold by-the-pound, we've turned a corner from actual democracy and sold ourselves to the highest bidder, nationally. A political action committee is just that, a group formed to achieve a specific outcome in the poltical sphere, a body that doesn't really represent The Public anymore, but typically a well-heeled subset who have chosen to give money to and support such an entity in order to in return seek personal gain and benefit from that entity's achievements. In one respect it's kind of hard to fathom why
    there aren't better safeguards against the actions of such bodies/groups, as it can be fairly said that they don't represent The People, as such.

    When we've hit the day where Congress can't make it's own mind up on an issue in the absence of influence from high-dollar action groups, well...then we've got issues as a nation...

    There are serious issues on the table, such as the debt, which, if continued to allow to grow, will soon hit 10 trillion dollars. That equates to some 400+ billion annual interest due, taken
    in the form of unnecessary taxes. I think that, faced with the decision, most people would opt NOT to pay taxes to china and saudi arabia, but that's exactly where all this is leading to. It doesn't matter HOW much money you have if you already owe ALL of it on a previous debt. Money is the capacity to buy things or use services that help us improve our lives. Better to leave such money in the hands of the people that worked for it and earned it, rather than in the hands of some faceless PAC whose only objective is cheap radios from china etc.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 30, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs