Bush Presumes to be the National Pastor

President Bush made two presidential proclamations designating September 16 as a National Day of Prayer and Remembrance for the Victims of Hurricane Katrina, and September 9th through 11th National Days of Remembrance for the victims of terrorism and the fallen veterans of his wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Setting aside for the moment the obvious issue of his naked attempt to elide the outrage of 9/11 with his war of folly in Iraq, I wonder where he finds the authority to proclaim such national prayer services?

In the proclamations themselves he makes a broad claim of authority for calling people to worship using the White House press office as a muezzin. He claims this religious function is based on “the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States.” I question whether such authority exists. The powers of the President enumerated by the Constitution certainly do not include being the nation’s pastor, and no act of Congress, itself enjoined from establishing religion, could confer ecumenical religious powers on the Presidency.

I certainly concede that a secular day of observation and ceremony to honor the memory of those who have died in disaster, war, and terrorist attack is warranted, but I do not think that any American President has the authority to call Americans to religious services. Nor does this President, in particular, have any moral authority to do so.

A far better memorial to the fallen would be to further real justice and equity in this nation, and to work toward peace and security for all, rather than issuing proclamations from on high calling for empty prayers. The ever-starker divisions between rich and poor, between those who can afford justice and those who do without, can only be bridged by acts, not by a costless proclamation of prayers. A President who has worked so assiduously to champion the causes of the powerful, and to denigrate and neglect the causes of the weak, has no more moral authority to proclaim days of remembrance for those his own failings brought low than he has the requisite legal authority to do so.

Continued on the next page Page 1 — Page 2

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found

Article comments

  • 1 - Experiements in Living

    Sep 17, 2005 at 1:00 pm

    I agree with what you are saying to an extent, but i dont think you are looking at things from enough of a 'us centric' point of view...

    It a statement of fact that people in the us take their religion far more seriously then in most (to the extent that it determined the last election)

    Im sorry if im guilty of stating the obvious, but my only point is that seen in that context, a united states president declaring a day of prayer and rememberence wouldnt be met with cynism, or seen as unexpected...

    it would be seen as doing something to help unite the country at a time when its been hit by so much tragedy

  • 2 - Michael J. West

    Sep 17, 2005 at 4:24 pm

    How is this any more sanctimonious and abusive of presidential authority/church-state separation than, for example, Abraham Lincoln declaring the last day of Thanksgiving "a day of Thanksgiving and Praise to our beneficent Father who dwelleth in the Heavens?"

    Of course, if you are planning to take President Lincoln to task, too, I will withdraw the question.

  • 3 - michael

    Sep 17, 2005 at 8:36 pm

    The distinction is that Bush doesn't even try to do anythig for the least among us. Lincoln had some moral basis to invoke the name of God; he freed the slaves, after all. What has Bush done that might grant him such moral authority outside the simple inhabitance of the office of President, which all should agree has no religious powers?

    Just because it is commonplace for a President to claim relgious prerogatives, does not mean that we need agree that Bush has such power. I do not find Bush an acceptable moral icon or ecumenical religious figure. And if I do not, many others surely do not, and we ought to say so. Loudly.

  • 4 - Michael J. West

    Sep 18, 2005 at 12:13 am

    Good point, I should have read the post more closely. You pretty clearly say that Bush in particular has no moral authority. FWIW, I concede. :-)

  • 5 - Justin Berry

    Sep 18, 2005 at 3:51 am

    He freed 25 million iraqis, and gave them their 40acres and a mule in iraq. If Bush and the vast majority of Christian americans are rubbing the cat the wrong way....turn the cat around.

  • 6 - Victor Lana

    Sep 18, 2005 at 7:38 am

    Bush shouldn't call it a day of prayer. I think that's the mistake. Call a day of recognition, remembrance, whatever. He's taking for granted that there are people who DO NOT PRAY. He's also overlooking the many different faiths in our country. Just another mistake from our fearless leader.

  • 7 - Shark

    Sep 18, 2005 at 7:58 am

    Bush could call it,

    "A Day of Futile Petitions to an Imaginary Omnipotent Diety Who Apparently Doesn't Give a Flying Fuck About What Happens on Earth."

    Just tryin' to be helpful...

    PS: I happen to think that if there is a pro-active God dealing with this little overcrowded, overpolluted blue ball that once housed "Paradise" -- then surely He intends things like the Tsumnami and Hurricane Katrina as kind of a Cosmic Flyswatter meant to reduce the population back to a manageable number.


    Voice: Dear Lord in Heaven..."

    [silence]

    Voice: um, Our Heavenly Father... are you there? Hello. Hello?

    [silence]

    Voice: um, God. I'm praying. I'm talking to You. Hello? Hello? Anybody home...?

    [sound of receiver being picked up, dropped, bouncing on the gold covered linoleum floor... then...]

    GOD: ...Oh, I'm sorry. I didn't hear the answering machine. I was busy working on this great new product; I call it the "Bird Flu" and *you people are gonna love it! It's gonna be more popular than the Beatles! It'll spread faster than an STD at a meeting of Televangelists in Amsterdam!





    * Historic-Etymology Note:

    "you people" is a Divinely Inspired Phrase invented to imply immediate inferiority in the hearer -- and it was passed along to Ross Perot as an oratory tool back in the late 1990s.

  • 8 - David R. Mark

    Sep 18, 2005 at 10:49 am

    On a similar note, you may want to check out this post on JABBS.

    It refers to Bush's sermon at the end of yesterday's weekly radio address.

  • 9 - WTF

    Sep 18, 2005 at 2:48 pm

    Good goin Shark, at least you got all the capitalizations right. Now repent you heathen! I Say Repent!

  • 10 - Natalie Davis

    Sep 18, 2005 at 3:45 pm

    Rock on, Sharkie!

  • 11 - Silas Kain

    Sep 18, 2005 at 4:28 pm

    Good going, Shark. The Christibans will say you are possessed by Satan. Great read at JABBS, Mark. I'm getting a little tired of the President invoking the Deity every time he flaps his trap. Karl Rove must be working with the Angel Gabriel behind the scenes.

  • 12 - Rex E Rowland

    Sep 22, 2005 at 6:01 pm

    Dear Pastor,
    I humbly apply for your free Bible .
    I want my life to be change and my friends life.Please I will like
    you to send us the Bible (4)Copies so that will can study it and
    understand it Sir. I realy need it . Well speak English language.
    This is my postal Address again.
    NO 2 SECOND OFFUNMWEGBE LANE OFF UZAMA OFF
    SILUKO ROAD OLIHA QUATERS BENIN CITY EDO STATE,
    NIGERIA.
    YoursFaithfully,
    PHONE:2348027893702
    REX E ROWLAND.
    I will being waiting for your reply Sir.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for May 29, 2012

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for April

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs