The state of Arizona is making a play for the distinction of implementing one of the absolute worst ideas ever to promote good citizenship.
With the ostensible goal of increasing interest in voting and thereby voter turnout, Arizonans will be faced this November with what is known as the Voter Reward Act. It is a referendum that would create a million dollar lottery awarded to a randomly chosen voter who cast a ballot in any given election. In other words, bribery.
The only real wonder is that it has taken so long to come to this.
Over a decade ago, in response to the manufactured crisis of low-voter registration rates, the federal government mandated that states begin registering people to vote when they received driver’s licenses and at agencies providing welfare related assistance. It also mandated that states allow mail-in voter registration.
Aside from the obvious problem of federalism (does anyone even worry about such niceties any more?), it also created several other problems. It made the job of committing voter fraud much easier, (“mail-in” registration!), and it made it more difficult for states to purge their rolls of inactive voters, (names which are more likely to be used in cases of fraud.)
The law did actually do one thing its supporters suggested, it increased the raw number of Americans registered to vote. What it didn’t do was make these newly minted voters any more interested in participating in the civic process than they were to begin with. As a result, the overall percentage of registered voter turnout dropped, which in turn gave the politicians a new dragon to slay – low voter turnout.
In response, many states have suffered under an array of new “solutions”, such as absentee balloting for no reason whatsoever, which then evolved into “early voting” in some states starting the balloting process as much as thirty days before Election Day (an increasingly meaningless term).
Oregon took it a step further and moved to an entirely mail-in balloting system, while others have moved to Election Day voter registration which allows you to both register and vote at the same time.
Those are just the bad ideas that have actually been tried. Some progressive agitators are even calling for doing away with registration entirely, while others have proposed that the federal government force states to drop prohibitions against felons voting once they’re out of prison. Worse yet, some (such as Jesse Jackson) advocate letting criminals vote from the comfort of their jail cells. No increase in the chance of fraud there.







Article comments
1 - RedTard
I'm not certain that the left plans on fraud to help them. Their nanny government programs appeal to the drags on society who can't hold a job, can't stay off drugs, can't quit having kids they can't afford, etc. It's no surprise that the same folks who are too lazy to work are also too lazy to vote usually.
This is a great innovation, there's nothing poor fools like to do more than lose the little money they have in lotteries and gambling, only this time they win either way. They either win the big million or vote leftist politicians to create programs for them to drain.
This is a reversal of the same logic that required poll taxes and literacy tests. Educated, productive, law abiding citizens vote one way, and poor slovenly criminals another. The left has declared the test for the former illegal and now has authorized incentives to get votes from the latter. It's a great move for them.
2 - larry
i am embarrased to live in az