Bill Clinton Is A Nazi - Page 3

Whatever the case may be, the president all but confirmed these allegations by systematically intimidating and auditing witnesses along with asking others to lie.

It has been a long time since most of us have recalled the track record of the Clinton regime. It makes the Plame Gate look laughable.

6. Controlled Mass Media

No offense, but if you believe George Bush or the Republican Party has control over the mass media, then you may as well give up on life, because you are devoid of any reasoning capabilities. Does anyone really argue against the idea that the news media has a strong liberal bias? Can anyone really argue otherwise?

Here are a couple tidbits that pretty much prove the point: "MSNBC.com identified 144 journalists who made political contributions from 2004 through the start of the 2008 campaign, according to the public records of the Federal Election Commission. Most of the newsroom checkbooks leaned to the left: 125 journalists gave to Democrats and liberal causes. Only 17 gave to Republicans." And again… "In a report released May 16, 2005, the researchers disclosed that the journalists they surveyed selected Democratic challenger John Kerry over incumbent Republican President George W. Bush by a wide margin, 52 percent to 19 percent..." 

7. Obsession with National Security

I don’t even know what this means. Obsessed with keeping the country safe — if that makes me a Nazi, sign me up. However, Clinton, to his credit, was obsessed with national security.

However, Clinton’s obsession differs from Bush's in a fairly stark way. Bush starts wars, Clinton used sanctions. If you think about it, Clinton’s way of handling conflicts was much more sadistic, and deadly for that matter. To put it simpler terms: would you rather get blown up and die instantly, or starve to death over the course of a couple months?

Of course, Clinton's rampant bloodlust led to a couple of rather embarrassing mistakes. Like the time we bombed a Chinese Embassy, or that aspirin factory, or the time his national security advisor stuffed secret documents down his pants.

8. Religion and Government are Intertwined

This is a tough one because what constitutes a religion or a religious idea is debatable. One could argue it is anything that is not based exclusively on reason that gives someone a greater purpose or meaning in life.

That being said, I think we can all agree that morals and religious ideas permeate the American government, as well as every other government around the world. You cannot separate morals from law. The notion is absurd. That being said, one of the strongest and fastest growing new age religions – environmentalism – is shoved down everyone’s throats by the Democratic Party.

Continued on the next page Page 1Page 2 — Page 3 — Page 4Page 5

Article tags

Spread the word
Bookmark and Share
Read comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own
  • No image found Mein Kampf

    In 1922, just four years after the war to end all wars, an unknown Austrian then living in Bavaria planned a pamphlet to be called Settling Accounts. In it he intended to attack the ineffectiveness of ...

Article comments

— go to most recent comments
  • 1 - alessandro Nicolo

    Jun 27, 2007 at 6:12 pm

    Light disagreements in parts but overall I tend to concur. As a history graduate, I cringe at the leaps of faiths made with how people treat the facts of history. It seems people come up with all sorts of "pet" analogies pulled completely out of context to prove a contemporary point.

    There is such a thing as intellectual discipline and honesty. Those who hold true to this are pushed aside these days and the media are all too willing to give space to modern pseudo-intellectual alchemists.

    Therein lies the fear. That the Bush to Nazi lineage does become part of the prevailing collective cultural perception. Once that happens it does not matter what the history books say. People have come to believe it.

  • 2 - sr

    Jun 27, 2007 at 7:41 pm

    Media Tycoon. How unfair of you trying to confuse liberal's with facts.

  • 3 - Media Tycoon

    Jun 27, 2007 at 8:28 pm

    Again, my point is not to smear liberals (although that may occur in this article). My point is that if Bush is a Nazi, then so is Bill Clinton...and I would bet, every American president in history.

  • 4 - Black Hole

    Jun 28, 2007 at 4:34 am

    G.W. Bush may or may not be a fascist but he certainly is an EMBARRASSMENT. It is even more embarrassing to read this partisan opinion which compares GWB to another mediocre politician like Bill Clinton. Seriously? Compare bad against bad?

  • 5 - Graham McKnight

    Jun 28, 2007 at 10:36 am

    Media Tycoon, I may heavily criticise the administration for some of its domestic and most of its foreign policies, but Clinton was most definitly not a Nazi.

    I find it hard to gather the strength needed to convince you of this point, so I shan't. On a sid enote, however, I do ask (from a long list of questions that I could ask of you about this spurious article); how is it that a desire to limit the sale of guns makes Clinton comparable to a Nazi?

  • 6 - Lee Richards

    Jun 28, 2007 at 11:16 am

    George Bush is nothing in particular. There is more than enough evidence to show that he has no core beliefs or basic principles. He can be swayed and convinced, led and bamboozled. His ego tells him he's a great leader;his handlers only need to give him enough rope to work their will.

    The Clintons are two of our great national embarassments of all time. If they weren't so selfish they would have done us the favor of retiring from public life a long time ago.

  • 7 - Dave Nalle

    Jun 28, 2007 at 11:52 am

    Graham, his pointis not that Clinton was or is a Nazi, but that if judged by the same standards by which people (most of whom revere Clinton) judge Bush to be a fascist, then Clinton would have to be called a Nazi or a Fascist too. I find it hard to believe that was too subtle a point for anyone.

    Dave

  • 8 - moonraven

    Jun 28, 2007 at 4:45 pm

    The US is an empire founded on genocide.

    That's more important than whether it is a fascist state.

    Fascism is everyhwhere. It did not die with Franco.

  • 9 - troll

    Jun 28, 2007 at 5:37 pm

    interesting that the author dismisses the protection of corporations - a hallmark of fascist politics - with: *Who knows what this is supposed to mean...*

    makes me question his grasp of his subject

    here's your bumper sticker for this thread: Italy lost the war but won the peace

    as for dee and dum - the pair are peanut butter and jelly

  • 10 - sr

    Jun 28, 2007 at 8:49 pm

    Graham Mcknight#5. Are you serious asking how is it that a desire to limit the sale of guns makes Clinton comparable to a Nazi? Well Graham after reading some history feel free to ask 6+million Jews, untold numbers of gypsires, homosectuals, the german populist, and more then I can mention. You say you lack the strength to convince us of your point. Do you have the strength to place a sign in front of your house that states this home is a gun free home. How do you think the frecking scum sucking Nazi's were so succesful. Take their guns away and it's just a walk through the park. That's what the liberal type Clinton's are still trying to do. Please tell me you are not that foolish. If so send me your address.

  • 11 - Media Tycoon

    Jun 28, 2007 at 9:33 pm

    #5

    That was kind of an embarrassing question...read up on some history. The first thing the Nazis did when they invaded France was take away guns from everyone. If I may suggest the novel Suite Francaise by Irene Nemirovsky…the gun situation is addressed in that book and it is a very good read.

    Also, if you read what I wrote, I never said Clinton was a Nazi (other than in the title). I said if you think Bush is a Nazi, then you must think Clinton is too.

    I don't like either president. Let’s get that clear.

    #9 when I said "whatever this means" I was asking how Bush protected big business. Sure our government protects business, and we should.

    business = jobs
    jobs = money
    money = happiness

    That was kind of a job, but you get the idea. We all need jobs and business facilitates that. I just don’t see how President Bush has helped business more than any other American president. The fact is he has not.

    That doesn’t mean I love him and that doesn't mean I hate him, it just is what it is.

  • 12 - Dave Nalle

    Jun 28, 2007 at 9:53 pm

    The US is an empire founded on genocide.

    Or, if you prefer the truth, the US is not an empire and most nations have some genocide in their history, generally not more or less than the US does.

    Dave

  • 13 - sr

    Jun 28, 2007 at 9:57 pm

    Media Tycoon. Right on the money. Thank you. Since your a Tycoon send some bucks to my friend Jet in Columbus. He is a good man and could use your help. Thanks, sr

  • 14 - Media Tycoon

    Jun 28, 2007 at 10:05 pm

    I said that was kind of a "job"

    ...i meant "joke"

  • 15 - sr

    Jun 28, 2007 at 10:13 pm

    I know Tycoon. Send him what you can please.

  • 16 - Media Tycoon

    Jun 28, 2007 at 10:48 pm

    to be honest, the term tycoon is more of an ambition than a reality, but when I actually achieve that status, I will send him what I can.

  • 17 - Shaun

    Jun 29, 2007 at 1:37 am

    Wow, the ignorance is appalling here. I don't mean to praise Clinton, I couldn't care less about the left vs. right debate, but Bush is a fraud.

    Bush has consistently acted to remove civil liberties (See New York's fight on crime to see it slowly coming into effect) - that's FASCIST.

    Since Bush has entered office, the government has increased its # of private contracts... Get this, NO BID Contracts... Corporatism is a form of fascism.

    Oh, and if you look back into history (for all of you self proclaimed intellectuals), please note how George W. Bush's grandfather funded IG Farben (German nationalized company) DURING WW2.

    Is that fascist enough for you? :)

  • 18 - Media Tycoon

    Jun 29, 2007 at 9:40 am

    #17

    By reading your response I know you didnt actually read what I wrote...

    However I must address one thing you said...

    So if G W Bush's grandfather did something bad he must be bad too?

    seriously...wtf are you talking about?

    Did your great great grandfather own slaves? By your own logic, if he did, then you hate blacks.

    You are on a roll. Keep it up.

    and also...since when is Bush responsible for fighting crime in NYC?

    Are you a real person? This must be some sort of spam.

  • 19 - Dr Dreadful

    Jun 29, 2007 at 12:06 pm

    Dave #12:

    We've been over this before, but since the US acquired much of its territory through conquest, invasion, deception and downright thievery, it does qualify as an empire.

    It just doesn't call itself one.

  • 20 - moonraven

    Jun 29, 2007 at 1:15 pm

    And Dave Nalle dismisses genocide as merely a "booger" left on the keyboard....

  • 21 - Media Tycoon

    Jun 29, 2007 at 9:10 pm

    You would be hard pressed to find a country in existence today that didnt conquer someone in order to exist. It doesn't make it right, but to pretend that America has been expectionally harsh on its natives is to be devoid of historical context.

  • 22 - sr

    Jun 29, 2007 at 11:06 pm

    Doc lets just give it all back starting with your house or whatever. You set the example and we will all follow. Moonbat are you still picking your nose for boogers. I did except my wife must wipe them off our keyboard since she is blind and type's on a braille keyboard.

  • 23 - Shaun

    Jun 30, 2007 at 8:16 pm

    Media Tycoon: My great grandfather was a slave in India to British imperialism. Nice try though :)

    1. I never praised Clinton - maybe he acted illegally too, in which case, congrats compiling the evidence.

    2. Bush's GRANDfather (not greatgrandfather) funded Nazi's DIRECTLY. The Bush FAMILY is connected to the Carlyle Group - making lots of money right now...

    What is going on is nothing but sick Corporatism/Fascism. The biggest (multi-billion dollar) corporations own the politicians, who own the laws that govern the corporations...

    If you don't refute that, then you realize this is all about money, and it's sickening. Bush is just following in his father's footsteps of course, but you can't say that anything he has done is for the benefit of our country.

  • 24 - Shaun

    Jun 30, 2007 at 8:19 pm

    As for government protecting big business, you're deluded.

    Government should foster the economy & enforce LAW. That is all. What they do now is selectively help certain corporations (the ones with enough money to get people elected).

    You're deluding yourself if you think gov't is just "protecting business" right now. They're destroying small businesses, competition, and individualism.

  • 25 - Dr Dreadful

    Jun 30, 2007 at 10:29 pm

    SR: I just offered my house and yard to the local Mono Indian tribe. They said thank you very much but they already have a ca$ino.

Add your comment, speak your mind

Personal attacks are NOT allowed.
Please read our comment policy.
Please preview your comment.

blogcritics lists for Nov 21, 2009

fresh articles Most recent articles site-wide

fresh comments Most recent comments site-wide

most comments Most comments in 24hrs

top writers Most prolific Blogcritics for October

top commenters Most prolific Commenters in 24 hrs