Friday morning I was parsing through tweets on my timeline and came across a link from Bloomberg BusinessWeek's account (@BW) to a piece titled, "Yes, the Financial System Is Rigged. Why Shouldn't You Profit From That Knowledge?" As a supporter of tougher financial regulation I was curious to see if the article would read as I expected it to and to make a long story short, it did. Roben Farzad, who wrote the piece, says,
Our system is rigged. Unfair, hopelessly neglectful of the little guy...you could shake your fist at all the bailouts; the record bank profits that are once again accruing to shareholders and executives; the asymmetry of rescuing now impossibly large institutions when so many individuals had to mail back the keys to their homes. But, in 20/20 hindsight, it was also smart to hedge that runaway cynicism with confidence that the system would take care of itself. In other words, you should have bought in.
Given Mr. Farzad's history as a former Goldman employee, I wasn't at all surprised to hear arguments of this type. But the idea that the average American taxpayer, making a living on unreasonably low wages, should willingly enter the nineteenth century gambling den our stock exchanges have become disturbs me greatly. This market dances on the puppet strings of six massive banking houses supported by the cadenced lumbering of a central bank determined to hand over countless trillions in tax dollars they no longer need. Combine that with the resurgence of Gilded Age market discipline, Wall Street is the last place anyone not already entangled in the briar patch should put their money.
Why not you ask? Mr. Farzad provides us with the answer to that one; the system is rigged and unless you're an employee of his former boss, it's not rigged to benefit you. Consider that the primary impetus of the recovery in share prices (and by extension, stock indexes) has been the almost $4 trillion in government cash provided nearly free of charge to financial institutions by the Federal Reserve. The Fed supplies capital at dizzyingly low rates, then the bankers use it to pad their investment portfolios and stock indices reach "record" highs thanks to the uptick in investment. But the only reason that the Fed starting giving banks big piles of cash in the first place was because those ticking time bombs, credit derivatives, that detonated and nearly took the financial system with them. We the people lost our houses and our jobs, but banks got trillions in exchange for, for — Bueller?
If that's not enough, ask yourself this question. What reason does the retail investor have to enter a marketplace built to serve the interests of America's financial conglomerates and which operates to benefit those interests at your expense? Keep in mind that the five largest banks in the country combined are worth about 62 percent of the nation's economy, and with interest rates can make the car you drive, that house you think you own, and your education extraordinarily expensive. Put that with the lack of real motivation from Congress or the White House to rein them in, the Federal Reserve guaranteeing their solvency regardless of balance sheet risk, and the absence of that safety net for you. That's not the market you want to invest in.